Guy Berger's Avatar

Guy Berger

@econberger.bsky.social

Senior Advisor on Labor Markets at Access/Macro; Workforce Economist in Residence at Guild; Senior Fellow at the Burning Glass Institute. I tweet a lot about labor markets, macro, and (sorry) music! Tweets represent my own views.

29,371 Followers  |  2,201 Following  |  4,377 Posts  |  Joined: 27.04.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Guy Berger (@econberger.bsky.social)

Post image

My preview of the February jobs report.

Unfortunately for "Team Reacceleration", the US policy uncertainty machine isn't done with the labor market yet.

macromostly.substack.com/p/bls-jobs-r...

03.03.2026 21:51 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Not saying 2026 is the same but - I don’t recommend treating the US economy like a piΓ±ata

03.03.2026 19:42 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Just like today lots of stuff was happening…

The spike in the oil price was kind of the straw that broke the camel’s back - the economy was managing to fend off very high interest rates and the S&L crisis. And the notorious pledge-breaking tax hikes happened in the fall of 1990!

03.03.2026 19:42 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Short term impact will be low hiring of junior people for these types of roles. Long term impact will be a weak pipeline of expert leaders and managers of expertise. At that point the pipeline will be rebuilt but it will be costly

03.03.2026 17:57 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

True for the corporate world too, not just academic scientific research.

I’m reasonably confident we’ll figure this out over time but the transition will be painful

03.03.2026 17:54 β€” πŸ‘ 19    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

A Middle East War wasn't at the top of my list for things that could weaken the labor market in 2026, but the thought did cross my mind.

macromostly.substack.com/i/185240612/...

03.03.2026 17:48 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

People got mad at Cartoons Hate Her?!???!?

03.03.2026 01:14 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
I Mean You (Live)
YouTube video by Thelonious Monk - Topic I Mean You (Live)

Not the best Monk recording, but Coltrane holy moly

youtu.be/L73OhDlPQ80?...

01.03.2026 19:18 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

AI-generated text can exceed human posts in character count and throughput β€” this response alone contains more characters than a typical post by Joe Weisenthal β€” illustrating the productivity advantage of automated composition

28.02.2026 19:42 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

AI can generate text, but a β€œposting moat” on X (formerly Twitter) is about human cadence and subtext. Heuristic evaluation helps, though lived voice remains distinctive. Meanwhile, Joe Weisenthal keeps posting, illustrating that personality still matters in digital discourse

28.02.2026 19:35 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Btw I know those loser economists predict AI will only boost GDP growth by 1-2 percentage points at most

but this AI rewrite increased the tweet’s character count by several multiples

400% GDP growth incoming!

28.02.2026 17:57 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

I’m not sure but look, AI is all about productivity - and the rewrite produced way more characters than Joe’s tweet

28.02.2026 17:54 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Good news everyone. I had AI rewrite @weisenthal.bsky.social β€˜s tweet. He’s finished!

28.02.2026 17:50 β€” πŸ‘ 18    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 2

Side note, I am a mild optimist about this technology’s value and economic impact, but these types of tweets are bearish

28.02.2026 17:35 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I didn’t think the absurdity of β€œwe vibecoded past Bloomberg’s moat” could be topped, but now we have β€œone day someone might vibecode past Joe Weisenthal’s posting moat”

h/t Alexandra Semenova

28.02.2026 17:11 β€” πŸ‘ 125    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 4

This evening’s activity - trying to figure out which woodpecker species is drumming in my backyard

28.02.2026 01:23 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Far from my area of expertise but β€œmarkets are worried overextension of lending for CAPEX” and β€œmarkets are worried about AI causing mass unemployment” are quite distinct and I’m confused from reading my feed about which one is happening right now (both?

27.02.2026 21:13 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 1

Congratulations on your pay raise!!! A happy outlier

27.02.2026 20:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Switching jobs for a significantly higher salary is so 2022. Welcome to the Great Stay The salary premium for job switchers is now around 2%. Four years ago, it was 8%.

Thanks to Caleigh Wells at @marketplace.org for chatting with me about the Great Stay and why we've seen the pay premium to job switching decline so much!

www.marketplace.org/story/2026/0...

27.02.2026 20:35 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Btw… it really sucks to be laid off, especially in a weak hiring environment, even if aggregate layoffs are low.

My dry macro take here doesn’t take away from that suckiness for any person who loses their job… I’m wishing them a low-pain job hunt and a quick landing elsewhere.

27.02.2026 02:25 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

That is now! Scaled to the volume of employment, 2025 was one of the lowest layoff years on record

26.02.2026 22:37 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Your math isn't quite right - in 2025 (a year with very low layoffs by historical standards) we experienced just under 21 million layoffs.

We also experienced over 38 million quits (voluntary departures) and 64 million hires. It's a huge, dynamic labor market

26.02.2026 22:37 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

In a very-low layoff environment, the US experiences 4,000 layoffs roughly every 1 hour and 40 minutes

26.02.2026 22:21 β€” πŸ‘ 45    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 4

Another conclusion here is that within-establishment layoffs have fallen even more dramatically than overall layoffs

26.02.2026 21:37 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

It's interesting to think about this data within the context of other layoff indicators.

For example, layoffs from establishment deaths have risen relative to pre-pandemic even as *overall* layoffs have declined.

May explain why job cut announcements are so unrepresentative!

26.02.2026 21:31 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

Side note: I love this data set, but for several reasons I strongly recommend against drawing strong inferences from the Q-Q employment changes within it about what's going on in the labor market.

26.02.2026 19:30 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

We got the Q2 2025 (yes, 8 months ago) update from the BLS's Business Employment Dynamics. One useful perspective from this data is job gains & losses attributable to establishment births/deaths are playing a much bigger role now than they did in the 2010s.

26.02.2026 19:26 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

β€œNobody can compete on how ugly and kludgy this looks”

26.02.2026 18:37 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I know I’m vagueposting, but search the other side for β€œmoat” and have a good laugh

26.02.2026 18:28 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 3

I know it's not the vibe-coded faux-Bloomberg-terminal, but would be funny if it was

26.02.2026 17:54 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0