Idiodyssey

Man that was one difficult watch with 1 tactic.

Also He seems to be imitating (stealing) the identity of the respectable and delightful richbaggie

Ok I know this is low tech but same. When I recently hired a floor sander I had to pay extra for a dust bag! It’s near impossible to use a floor sander without a dust bag - that is an integral part of the machine!

Fascinating- Thanks for sharing; would enjoy reading more (detail) but there you go. Chatgtp says no books on Morin and football, so recommends reading La Methode by Morin but those pesky French philosophers often write in an impenetrable way.

Didn’t see one but my Merlin app recorded 1 last night when sat outside in Kew at 8.00.

I think it’s paid in OpenAI equity so hardly the sum quoted. Not first whet OpenAI is worth given debts, expenditure and abject failure to date to seriously monetise Chatgtp. Also Altman co owns the company he just paid 8.5 million for!

I live in Worcestershire and have walked many of the paths cross crossing the county. I have walked a number of paths that pass through people’s back garden so it is not as unique as suggested by the owners of the property. Maybe sue your solicitor rather than aggravate the local community.

The whinging defence that ‘I didn’t know it was a rule so I fielded an ineligible player’ was pathetic. The obvious reason as to why it is such a good rule was even explained. Your treatment of the other team who followed the rules felt unpleasant - not like banter but bullying.

I agree with much of this but utterly baffled (as a sympathetic supporter of Mowbray) by Mowbray team selection tonight in 1 half, especially. Armstrong rw, Price cf, and Grant over Johnstone.

Any chance that Worcester might post interviews on here or WhatsApp ? I’m no longer on Twitter due to the dreadful stuff that kept popping into my timeline.

But Chris, I respect you are entitled to have an opinion but where’s the data? I would imagine the quality is pretty similar year on year although the relegated clubs might be distorting the top three quality year on year due to their money. You might be right, but I’m sceptical 😎

Every year fans claim the championship is thé worst ever, or its really poor THIS season. I’m sorry you’ve joined that club. The quality I would guess is pretty similar year on year.

Truly a disgrace. Overwhelmingly dominated by private school educated males who will continue to employ members of their tribe regardless.

Maybe ask DeepSeek, or its like.

O I see. Thank you

How can West Brom have a higher chance of making the playoffs than Burnley or Sheffield united? That suggests there is something wrong with the data or analysis (and I am a West Brom fan)

👍

I am grateful you are here. I left Twitter due to the horrible hate and right wing stuff it put in my feed. There are a number of Championship clubs on here - I follow them . I am dismayed that the Albion aren’t on here - as well as a Worcester ccc - given the racism and sexism which is on x.

I’ve read it’s a fraudulent number because they include APIs

O the adjective narrow is confusing too - as if a 1-0 loss could ever be big

In the Worcester news today a headline reads : ‘Worcester take narrow 1-0 loss in physical bout’. Leaving aside the strange use of the word ‘bout’ , surely you can’t ‘take’ a loss? ? ?

I saw similar on the wba unofficial website too. A number of ‘I told you so - he’s rubbish and should never have been appointed’. Unbelievable really. Demoralising to read - I’ll not go on that website again for a while. Social media - What a time to be alive 😟

Watched the game on a stream in Spain. Definitely offside for the one although the Armstrong goal disallowed for a push was not a push🤷🏼‍♀️ But our defending was so poor.

This is of course nonsense - masquerading as truth. A made up place and false etymologies

I don’t think she mentioned Trump. I’m afraid you are engaging in spreading misinformation

I would question how a school could possibly achieve consistent results 2.5 times the expected (or whatever the measure) GCSE grade. I wander how the baseline is established on which this measure is based on and is this assessed against a national non- selective cohort. Apples and Pears.

So I click the link and indeed have access to a number of articles - but not the one concerning Zuckerberg. I’m sorry to say but this is misleading if not potentially fraudulent.

Yes and I’d be surprised if they don’t improve as the season progresses.

Thank you

I don’t understand why this is seen as some kind of close vote. Surely Labour have a comfortable majority? Can someone explain