Or at least forget long enough to find ground to build anew. Turn around may be fair play, but it only makes the war go on.
03.03.2026 15:25 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Or at least forget long enough to find ground to build anew. Turn around may be fair play, but it only makes the war go on.
03.03.2026 15:25 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This is Hippo. He's visiting Scotland for the first time. Had no idea they made squeaky toys for humans too. 14/10 (TT: kelseydarragh)
02.03.2026 23:46 — 👍 9156 🔁 1290 💬 261 📌 105This is a ggood thing if you are into growth economics. Migration in this context meaning new people from anywhere, includIng other states in the US. Thus is a rage baiting headline
02.03.2026 15:49 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Hey I am now on a new social network that is privacy focused, ad free, and a safe space to share. hey.cafe/r/seedyone
02.03.2026 03:26 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0There is a fight for power going on under Trump. As soon as someone is able to pull together a coalition strong enough to oust the other interests, Trump will be gone. It is politics as usual -- protect the system that protects the most power.
01.03.2026 20:45 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Political rationalization that beggars belief
01.03.2026 20:36 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Dear Senator McCormick -
Now would be a good time for Republicans to stop playing political games with our national security by withdrawing from continued participation in the dangerous situation in the Middle East.
They were prepared. If the warmongers didn't know this, they truly have given up on intelligence gathering.
01.03.2026 20:35 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yeah, I'm not sure I'm sold on the veil lifted from my eyes narrative that he and MTG are selling. I'll take the outcome, because it is politics, but I wouldn't trust the guy even as far as I could see him.
01.03.2026 20:32 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Right now UK is pretty much running the electrical grid on renewables and Nuclear.
01.03.2026 15:44 — 👍 3970 🔁 731 💬 117 📌 46mmmm, i may know that dog
28.02.2026 23:48 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Looking across heavy forest to snow covered peaks with pines in the foreground
28.02.2026 04:30 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I would vote for them! I'm still giggling.
28.02.2026 04:26 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yes, that's why she wrote it and included all the detail.
26.02.2026 19:36 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Tourette's isn't a mental illness. It is a neurological condition. He has no control over what he says. And yes, it was hurtful to the people on stage on a visceral level. The BBC could have edited it out and saved the global outrage and allowed them to settle it privately, but they didn't.
25.02.2026 01:38 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The BBC could have avoided so much aggravation by some judicious editing, but they wouldn't get nearly as many clicks.
25.02.2026 01:35 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0and yet the women are so much better.
25.02.2026 01:15 — 👍 23 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0So the Leaf's locker room is ok with dissing the women, too?
25.02.2026 01:08 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0of course they did. what's new? unfortunately, the accusation is often enough.
24.02.2026 19:48 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0probably more accurate to say in the SE corner.
24.02.2026 19:22 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0finally. It's been a dry winter in the valley but the Rockies have 125% of normal snowpack. Glad to see it.
24.02.2026 19:21 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0a new policy doesn't infer a failure. This headline suggests that previous policy failed to produce what it intended to produce in order to provide the author a high ground and sets up a narrative for opposition.
24.02.2026 19:20 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0bonne nuit. et merci.
23.02.2026 19:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0but I think it means that this is the avenue by which they are impeached and convicted individually, not that they all gone at once. In other words, you could impeach and convict the VP or a cabinet secretary and not get the Pres in the process.
23.02.2026 19:39 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0but I don't think so. The constitution says that the Pres, VP and all civil officials shall be removed if impeached and convicted, but I read that as the way to remove them individually not that they would all go at the same time.
23.02.2026 19:37 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0For me it's an ADHD thing. Happens way too often.
23.02.2026 19:34 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I agree and I would love to be wrong about this.
23.02.2026 19:33 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0language
23.02.2026 19:33 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0injecting human consciousness into the discussion because we are limited in that way. But there will always be things outside what humans can put words and they will continue to exist whether or not we label them. I usually use "the Earth" rather than "nature" to avoid just this criticism.
23.02.2026 19:33 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Ah, there we seriously disagree. There is reality outside language. "Nature" as a concept would not exist outside human consciousness, or language but existence as a thing can be without humans. That we do not know it does not obviate its existence. We cannot talk about it without
23.02.2026 19:33 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0