University journal publishers – global, messy and underestimated - LSE Impact
Despite being systematically underestimated university presses are a widespread and structurally significant part of the journal publishing landscape.
👀ICYMI: "We tend to picture publishing as something done by large commercial companies, big learned societies or a handful of famous university presses. But universities also publish at scale, across disciplines and in many languages."
@mikaellaakso.bsky.social @zehrataskin.bsky.social #ScholComms
12.02.2026 16:07 —
👍 6
🔁 4
💬 0
📌 1
Who gets to speak at global conferences? Rethinking equity in academic exchange
Academic conferences are vital for knowledge exchange. But participation is greatly unequal due to material (eg financial) barriers - and epistemic hierarchies
Academic conferences are meant to be centred around a spirit of openness.
In reality, participation is shaped by deep structural inequalities, write @zehrataskin.bsky.social, Ivan Kislenko, Ayça Nur Sezen and @guledadogan.bsky.social on @lseinequalities.bsky.social
13.02.2026 08:45 —
👍 6
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
University journal publishers – global, messy and underestimated - LSE Impact
Despite being systematically underestimated university presses are a widespread and structurally significant part of the journal publishing landscape.
💥New | University journal publishers – global, messy and underestimated
✍️ Maryna Nazarovets @mikaellaakso.bsky.social & @zehrataskin.bsky.social
#AcademicPublishing #UniversityPresses #AcademicSky
05.02.2026 11:10 —
👍 11
🔁 12
💬 0
📌 1
Who gets to speak at global conferences? Rethinking equity in academic exchange
Academic conferences are vital for knowledge exchange. But participation is greatly unequal due to material (eg financial) barriers - and epistemic hierarchies
What are the material barriers that prevent some researchers from attending academic conferences? Do “epistemic hierarchies” further limit participation and the open exchange of ideas?
Zehra Taşkın, Ivan Kislenko, Ayça Nur Sezen & Güleda Doğan explore
#LSEInequalitiesBlog
03.02.2026 11:07 —
👍 9
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
Mapping the publisher types and collaborations behind Web of Science indexed journals
Abstract. Although the organisational aspects of scholarly journals—such as the types of organisations responsible for publishing individual journals, whether independently or in collaboration—have si...
74.4% of the 21,886 WoS-indexed journals involve commercial professional publishers, 29% societies, and 27.8% research organisations as sole/co-publishers. Our paper co-authored with @zehrataskin.bsky.social, Emanuel Kulczycki & @mikaellaakso.bsky.social - now on QSS website: doi.org/10.1162/qss....
15.07.2025 10:57 —
👍 15
🔁 6
💬 0
📌 0
This interesting new preprint on SocArXiv shows that "The landscape of academic journals is beyond the oligopoly: it is diverse and often grounded in public, academic-driven initiatives rather than market imperatives." osf.io/preprints/so...
11.06.2025 17:01 —
👍 11
🔁 5
💬 1
📌 0
"Our findings challenge the prevailing narrative that a few commercial publishers dominate global scholarly publishing. While prior analyses based on selective indexes reinforced the perception of an oligopoly [...], examining diverse national contexts reveals a more pluralistic reality."
11.06.2025 12:29 —
👍 4
🔁 3
💬 0
📌 0
OSF
📢 Our new study challenges the prevailing narrative that a few commercial publishers dominate global scholarly publishing! Read the preprint: Beyond the oligopoly: Scholarly journal publishing landscapes in Latin America and Europe. doi.org/10.31235/osf...
11.06.2025 12:19 —
👍 19
🔁 13
💬 0
📌 2
We keep talking about the problem of questionable publishing—but let’s not forget, the reason it exists is because there’s a market for it. As long as there are people willing to pay for shortcuts, someone will offer them.
10.04.2025 06:57 —
👍 4
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I received two book chapter invitations on the same day. One gives a 5-day window from submission to publication. The other outlines a 2-year process with clear milestones: draft writing, reviews, revisions, and editing.
The difference speaks for itself.
10.04.2025 06:57 —
👍 5
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
1001 projemizde bir yıl boyunca birlikte çalışmak üzere bir doktora sonrası araştırmacı ve bir doktora öğrencisi arıyoruz. Burs bedelleri TÜBİTAK tarafından belirlenen en üst limitlere göre belirlendi. Elden ele yayarsanız, tanıdıklara iletirseniz seviniriz.
08.04.2025 09:17 —
👍 14
🔁 8
💬 0
📌 0
We are continuing our series of internal seminars on Bernal's "Social Function of Science". It is an inspiring and strongly multidisciplinary approach to science. Simultaneous study of economics, politics and science is practised in many research in our Group
07.04.2025 19:40 —
👍 2
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
Arkadaşlar, takipleşmeyi bırakıp bir şeyler yazsanız burası daha ilginç bir yer olabilir.
07.04.2025 17:38 —
👍 18
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 0
“Başka türlü bir şey” – Zehra Taşkın
Blog yazdım. Başka türlü bir şey oldu. İki öksürük krizi arasında. Gelişine.
Başka türlü bir şey: www.zehrataskin.com/index.php/20...
06.04.2025 21:58 —
👍 10
🔁 2
💬 1
📌 0
Twitlerimizi escort hesapları, skitlerimizi mavigökler trend topic hesapları beğeniyor en ilk.
06.04.2025 22:22 —
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Bir geri takip uğruna ya rab, ne hızlı etkileşimler veriliyor.
Yapman guzum.
06.04.2025 22:11 —
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
“Başka türlü bir şey” – Zehra Taşkın
Blog yazdım. Başka türlü bir şey oldu. İki öksürük krizi arasında. Gelişine.
Başka türlü bir şey: www.zehrataskin.com/index.php/20...
06.04.2025 21:58 —
👍 10
🔁 2
💬 1
📌 0
Haha bence de. Artık internet ortamında dil engeli olmaması çok hoş.
04.04.2025 20:16 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
If the local developments in my country lead to frequent posts, feel free to unfollow.
For academic updates, I’ll stick to LinkedIn :=)
04.04.2025 20:14 —
👍 9
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
I joined Bluesky 2 years ago to share my works with international colleagues. I used to post in Turkish on Twitter, mainly about politics and current events.
But after Elon Musk’s interventions, I’ve decided to leave X. So, I’ll now be posting in both English and Turkish here +
04.04.2025 20:14 —
👍 19
🔁 2
💬 1
📌 1
Scholarly Communication Research Group | Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
Our Group is on Bluesky now!
Interested in research on: scholarly communication, higher education, bibliometrics or geopolitics of science? Follow us!
Some scholars from SCRG are already here (@kszadkowski.bsky.social @zehrataskin.bsky.social @franekkra.bsky.social )
Our website: sc.amu.edu.pl
07.02.2025 14:16 —
👍 14
🔁 3
💬 1
📌 1
Akademik suistimalin 50 tonu – Zehra Taşkın
@zehrataskin.bsky.social hocadan:
"“Akademisyenlik iş değildir. Bir tutkudur.” Bu tutku sebebiyle sizden beklenenlerse insanüstü bir özveriyle, ağır iş yükünden şikayet etmeden, düşük maaşla ve güvencesiz pozisyonlarda çalışmaya devam etmenizdir."
www.zehrataskin.com/index.php/20...
11.02.2025 10:14 —
👍 6
🔁 3
💬 1
📌 0
Published version available: asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
10.01.2025 06:10 —
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
74% of 21,886 WoS-indexed journals involve professional publishers, 29% learned societies, and 28% research organisations as publishers or collaborators. Check out our new preprint co-authored with @zehrataskin.bsky.social, Emanuel Kulczycki and @mikaellaakso.bsky.social: doi.org/10.31235/osf...
24.11.2024 14:35 —
👍 13
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
OSF
It's raining preprints, hallelujah 🎶
Here is my latest preprint (review article) >> Sustaining the ‘frozen footprints’ of scholarly communication through open citations
osf.io/preprints/so...
21.11.2024 10:34 —
👍 8
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 1
Note: the academic community was paying billions to publishers before OA existed. OA models make these costs more apparent, but don't make publishing cheaper. Diamond OA might, let's see!
[Nb2: figs here are overestimates. Can't account for waivers, discounts, or transformational-agreements].
20.11.2024 11:10 —
👍 6
🔁 5
💬 1
📌 0