Rich Priestley's Avatar

Rich Priestley

@durnoido.bsky.social

Bit of an #lufc durnoid, baker of bread, friend of a toothless dog.

291 Followers  |  397 Following  |  1,130 Posts  |  Joined: 14.11.2024
Posts Following

Posts by Rich Priestley (@durnoido.bsky.social)

We are not blessed with quality attacking players tbh. We've been playing something closer to the Sunderland rΓ΄le in most of our games so far, and have had little practice at breaking down that level of unwillingness to play football.

04.03.2026 10:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I dont think it was even a stinker. We just weren't up to the standard required. A little jaded and lacking the creative spark required to break down a team who are determined not to be.

04.03.2026 10:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a cartoon of homer simpson and bart simpson sitting on a couch with the words join us above them . ALT: a cartoon of homer simpson and bart simpson sitting on a couch with the words join us above them .
02.03.2026 13:29 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

So think we'll get 20 points too! Great to hear you share my (over) optimism. #lufc

02.03.2026 12:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Indeed. Perhaps Im hormonal. Feeling unusually positive

01.03.2026 18:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Isn't it just, though? Esp with 3 games in London.

01.03.2026 16:03 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

How many points do you think well finish on? Here's my optimistic take on how many pts we'll get
v Sun 3
Pal v 1
v Bren 3
Scum v 1
v Wol 3
Bou v 1
v Bur 3
Tot v 3
v Bri 3
WHa v 1
Total 22
I would argue they are all winnable games

01.03.2026 15:50 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Bravo

01.03.2026 12:17 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I am probably being a tad over optimistic. Every season under Farke we have got better over the ssn. The quality of the opposition in the last few games may have masked us coming into our prime in the crunch time period.

01.03.2026 15:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The way Citeh reacted at the end wasn't just because they are in the title race. They were relieved simply in the context of the game. I think this run of games we've just had was like training with weights on. Now for the real thing. Its possible we get another 20 points. Did I just say that?

01.03.2026 15:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The way we played yesterday. That is not a team that is getting relegated. I think we'll finish above Sunderland.

01.03.2026 15:01 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

Absolutely bang on by @jonathanliew.bsky.social

The Mail calls out racism on its back page, while promoting unsubstantiated, outright racism on its front page.

🎯

01.03.2026 09:15 β€” πŸ‘ 46    πŸ” 20    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

It could've, I agree, but I would argue that on the evidence of full time, they were more fatigued than we were, so perhaps fatigue wasn't the reason we couldn't get out of our half for 15 mins, and fresh legs weren't the reason we had them under pressure for the last 20. Both teams 'n' that.

01.03.2026 11:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

you

01.03.2026 10:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I apologise for giving the impression i thought that you personally wanted him removed. That was not my intention. I have interacted with plenty on here who do, and use that as a justification esp. now so many of their previous reasons have gone. My post was an attempt to agree with you.

01.03.2026 10:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

How so?

01.03.2026 09:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

This is my kitchen wall. I will love the man forever. We all knew his flaws, but were willing to accommodate them. A lot of people who rail against Farke for the timing of his subs (of all things) have to ask themselves if it's the subs or Farke himself they have a problem with.

01.03.2026 09:47 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Whatever he does he can't win unless we win, which was always unlikely. If they work but we don't win, it should have been sooner, if they don't work it was the wrong choice, as if there was ever a choice that was guaranteed to work. The other thing looks great in hindsight.

01.03.2026 09:40 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Every team has fans who have doubts. Having doubts is not enough justification for call for him to go. Its a pipe dream to think you will every get one about whom you have no doubts.

01.03.2026 09:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If you look at the table of average time of first sub in the PL the range goes from something like 68 mins at the bottom to 79 mins at the top. Farke is in the low 70s. I.e. they are all the same.

01.03.2026 09:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

So now we have definitive proof that Guardiola is leaving Man City at the end of the season. No one who knows he is going to have to come back to Elland Rd next season would deliberately set themselves up to have an entire stadium shout 'wanker wanker' at him cos they know it winds him up. #lufc

01.03.2026 09:27 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I agree.

28.02.2026 15:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I believe the share it

28.02.2026 15:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

As you were sending this message I took a stray one from Graham Norton

28.02.2026 00:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Reservations, eh? OK. My payment has gone out this morning, and I have my email. πŸ™‚

27.02.2026 11:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

No worries

26.02.2026 19:50 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Hi there,

Found this

26.02.2026 19:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

When did you get the email?

26.02.2026 17:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Me too.

26.02.2026 16:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Did you purchase your own ST seat that was reserved for you in the first round? I can see this but no dosh has been taken

26.02.2026 16:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0