Picture of union flag draped coffins in an aircraft carrier "British and American soldiers are going to die (or be maimed for life) in order to take the heat off predatory paedophiles. Why is anyone supporting this?"
British and American soldiers are going to die (or be maimed for life) in order to take the heat off predatory paedophiles.
Why is anyone supporting this?
#Iran #EpsteinWars
03.03.2026 11:22 β
π 10
π 7
π¬ 0
π 0
All the reasons for the Iran war make ZERO sense.
Rubio paraphrased: "Israel was going to start a war on Iran, so the USA had to join in to prevent retaliations on the USA".
So USA couldn't stop Israel which it gives billions in military aid each year. It has no leverage apparently.
03.03.2026 10:18 β
π 15
π 10
π¬ 4
π 0
Labour Right Watch
Following the Labour party's right wingers
A blog that looks at figures on Labourβs right wing and their many links with big business, the arms industry, the private health sector, the crackdown on protesters, and political lobbying by private interests.
labourrightwatch.wordpress.com
03.03.2026 08:43 β
π 12
π 8
π¬ 0
π 4
U.S. Troops Were Told Iran War Is for βArmageddon,β Return of Jesus
Advocacy group reports commanders giving similar messages at more than 30 installations in every branch of the military
EXCLUSIVE: At more than 30 installations, U.S. commanders told troops the war on Iran is a Christian war.
The Military Religious Freedom Foundation has been βinundatedβ with more than 110 complaints.
One NCO said they were told the U.S. war is to bring about Armageddon and the return of Jesusβ¦
03.03.2026 01:54 β
π 8158
π 4095
π¬ 773
π 2782
The attack on Iran happened because Donald Trump wanted war, not because Iran posed an imminent threat.
01.03.2026 14:03 β
π 3131
π 462
π¬ 218
π 47
Those sycophants laughing
03.03.2026 08:28 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
ublications are expected to demonstrate what steps they have taken not to publish inaccurate information β this shows compliance with the Editorsβ Code, and a commitment to high editorial standards The publication had not provided any evidence of adequate pre-publication checks, and within hours of publication it had evidently been able to establish that it could not stand by the story. In these circumstances, IPSO found that there was a serious failure to take care not to publish inaccurate information and a breach of Clause 1 (i). The Committee acknowledged that, given the unusual circumstances of the case, the publication could not identify each specific inaccuracy in the article and correct it; this followed from its earlier failure to take care. Nonetheless, the consequence was that the publication could not verify any of the remaining details in the article in a manner
which would allow it to adequately correct the record in the manner required by the Code.
Telegraph is forced - finally - to publish a proper apology for simply inventing a story.
Of course they continue to do this about immigrants/immigration pretty much every single day...
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/teleg...
03.03.2026 07:58 β
π 134
π 53
π¬ 6
π 2
He's an out and out Zionist I'm afraid.
02.03.2026 18:02 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Spain have an actual spine
02.03.2026 17:43 β
π 11
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
bsky.app/profile/labo...
02.03.2026 16:40 β
π 1
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
In my view Starmer will do whatever Washington wants, even if there's a small delay sometimes.
He was looking for a technicality to give the impression of not doing a Tony Blair.
He's pro Israel and v embedded with UK & US security services, so meaningful resistsance to Trump's war is unlikely.
02.03.2026 16:38 β
π 2
π 1
π¬ 0
π 0
Don't get too excited, Starmer always caves.
His reticence to join the war will be about technicalities only.
He's a moral vacuum.
02.03.2026 16:32 β
π 160
π 1
π¬ 13
π 0
He's going to be very disappointed when he realises his mistake.
Hope to god he doesn't press nuclear button in a tantrum. Oh my word the world hangs on this fool.
02.03.2026 16:28 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
I don't see any commentators asking how much UK's involvement in this war is going to cost. π€
They are always so keen to know when nurses ask for more pay, right?
#Iran
02.03.2026 16:25 β
π 46
π 19
π¬ 1
π 5
Very Trumpian
02.03.2026 11:49 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Approx 14 coffins draped in the union flag, lined up inside a military aircraft
All those backing the war on Iran to the hilt...
Do they have fighting age children or grandchildren?
Will they be sending them to the front?
Or do they prefer the working class (as always) to be the cannon fodder in this Epstein files-distraction war?
02.03.2026 10:50 β
π 19
π 9
π¬ 2
π 1
Yvette Cooper says its appalling that Iran has retaliated to being attacked and she calls on them to stop retaliating.
Yes, really.
02.03.2026 08:16 β
π 195
π 101
π¬ 58
π 22
yep
02.03.2026 10:36 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
You cannot talk like this about any other minority in America.
And if it was any other presidentβs adviser who said something like this about any other minority, itβd be the instant end of their presidency.
02.03.2026 07:54 β
π 23407
π 5850
π¬ 1706
π 627
Sweet jesus this is open nazism
02.03.2026 10:34 β
π 64
π 1
π¬ 2
π 0
Palankier Starmer
02.03.2026 10:33 β
π 5
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Palantir Sues Swiss Magazine For Accurately Reporting That The Swiss Government Didnβt Want Palantir
If you run a company whose entire value proposition is the ability to see patterns, predict outcomes, and connect dots that others miss, youβd think someone in the building might have flaggedβ¦
"using Palantirβs software would increase dependence on a U.S. provider. It also poses the risk of losing data sovereignty and thereby national sovereignty.
"Above all, however, the armyβs staff experts say it remains unclear who has access to data shared with Palantir."
02.03.2026 08:31 β
π 568
π 280
π¬ 17
π 8
Taken before their win as well.
Wonder if next lot of polling will show a bounce
02.03.2026 10:32 β
π 3
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
YouGov poll, 20.2.26
Would you support or oppose allowing the US to launch air strikes Iran from RAF bases in the UK?
58% oppose.
https://yougov.com/en-gb/daily-results/20260220-59e70-1
https://yougov.com/en-gb/daily-results/20250613-0d5a9-3
https://yougov.com/en-gb/daily-results/20250617-e69cd-1
https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/54158-few-americans-support-usa-military-action-against-iran-majority-think-it-is-likely-february-20-23-2026-economist-yougov-poll
Why are so many pundits and politicians gunning for war with Iran when the British public clearly DO NOT WANT IT?
Funny how they only bring up "the will of the people" when it suits them π€.
[PS - Americans don't want it either]
01.03.2026 12:03 β
π 23
π 15
π¬ 1
π 1
Starmer groveling to pick up Trump's papers
01.03.2026 23:00 β
π 31
π 8
π¬ 0
π 1
you were spot on
01.03.2026 22:58 β
π 4
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Starmer is taking our country into Trump's illegal war, but he's found a technicality to protect himself.
That's what the delay was for.
Pure Starmer.
01.03.2026 22:19 β
π 11
π 2
π¬ 1
π 0
No justice MTG retweeting Otto's earlier tweet.
https://x.com/NoJusticeMTG/status/2028231981188735016?s=20
01.03.2026 22:17 β
π 11
π 1
π¬ 0
π 0