Richard Moorhead's Avatar

Richard Moorhead

@richardmoorhead.bsky.social

Law prof in UK, and Australia (Exeter and Monash). Empirical and conceptual work on lawyers regulation and ethics. Especially the Post Office and all who billed her. Horizon Compensation Advisory Board. Plastic Geordie. Novice cello player

6,987 Followers  |  2,757 Following  |  1,013 Posts  |  Joined: 05.10.2023  |  1.6693

Latest posts by richardmoorhead.bsky.social on Bluesky

The great William Twining has died at 91. Much admired by legal academics across the world

13.10.2025 07:31 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes, it’s just all the boring stuff in and around very occasional funny bits that means I am giving up on it

10.10.2025 06:57 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
SRA v Carter-Ruck, the stories begin to emerge The Bureau of Investigative Journalism has written an extended piece on Carter-Ruck criticising them for β€œan increasingly aggressive strategy targeting one London [Police] officer” who was investig…

Excellent from @richardmoorhead.bsky.social on aggressive defamation law firm's interactions with police, SRA and others when defending a client on FBI's most wanted list. If professional ethics fail, tough regulation is the only alternative. lawyerwatch.wordpress.com/2025/10/08/s...

09.10.2025 20:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Ninth Circuit just ended appeals from denial of anti-SLAPP motions in federal court, overturning 20+ years of precedent. From a practical standpoint, massively consequential case. From a principled standpoint, major blow to free expression. Bad.

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/op...

09.10.2025 22:31 β€” πŸ‘ 252    πŸ” 83    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 3

Thank you!

09.10.2025 22:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hell hath no fury like Dan Neidle quoted out of context

09.10.2025 22:36 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I. Think. Traitors. Is. Boring.

09.10.2025 22:32 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
SRA v Carter Ruck, the stories begin toΒ emerge The Bureau of Investigative Journalism has written an extended piece on Carter-Ruck criticising them for β€œan increasingly aggressive strategy targeting one London officer” who was investigating what has been described elsewhere as a Ponzi scheme. Β I quote liberally here from that piece, which I am sure will be of interest to many lawyerwatch readers, to try and explain the key elements of the story.

It is worth keeping an eye on the SRA v Carter-Ruck (CoinBase) case. Here are some thoughts on an early story...

08.10.2025 14:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
SRA v Carter Ruck, the stories begin toΒ emerge The Bureau of Investigative Journalism has written an extended piece on Carter-Ruck criticising them for β€œan increasingly aggressive strategy targeting one London officer” who was investigating what has been described elsewhere as a Ponzi scheme. Β I quote liberally here from that piece, which I am sure will be of interest to many lawyerwatch readers, to try and explain the key elements of the story.

It is worth keeping an eye on the SRA v Carter-Ruck (CoinBase) case. Here are some thoughts on an early story...

08.10.2025 14:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh my. I am sorry to hear that.

06.10.2025 19:09 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Deloitte to pay money back to Albanese government after using AI in $440,000 report Partial refund to be issued after several errors were found in a report into a department’s compliance framework

Dr Christopher Rudge, law lecturer at the University of Sydney, says the report that Deloitte prepared for Australia's Department of Employment and Workplace Relations contained β€œhallucinations” because of an initially undisclosed use of generative AI. Now the government is getting its money back.

06.10.2025 10:40 β€” πŸ‘ 40    πŸ” 37    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 15
Post image

Oof. 🀑

@financialtimes.com
www.ft.com/content/934c...

06.10.2025 14:15 β€” πŸ‘ 939    πŸ” 220    πŸ’¬ 26    πŸ“Œ 18

No. Same problem yesterday

05.10.2025 17:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ah

30.09.2025 07:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
US law firm in London settles claim over "u-turn on helping trans man" Morrison Foerster has agreed to pay damages to the Good Law Project and the trans man it supported in a discrimination claim against the US law firm’s London office.

Morrison Foerster settles Trump related trans case. Edi investigation ongoing? www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/...

30.09.2025 05:23 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Neidle seems to say the ST story on Starmer is rather weak.

28.09.2025 08:14 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Have now read the blog. Β‘Hasta la victoria siempre!

28.09.2025 08:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You are BUSY

27.09.2025 18:46 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Very interesting on a bunch of things including reparations

27.09.2025 09:59 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yep. He looks classy to me.

26.09.2025 12:23 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Behind Closed Doors Screenshot from Tax Policy Associates. Secrecy in professional regulation is starting to become the focus of more attention. Two cases this week throw that into sharp relief. One is the story of Robin Makin, which appears to be ongoing, with practice limitations imposed already, but with an allegation of vexatious private prosecution apparently in train. The journalist, Charlie Moloney, says…

Keeping lawyer discipline under wraps... an issue coming into stronger focus

26.09.2025 10:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

This is good from @samfr.bsky.social on the imminent eclipse of the Tory party samf.substack.com/p/last-rites

25.09.2025 11:56 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

I get that the news cycle is packed right now, but I just heard from a colleague at the Smithsonian that this is fully a GIANT SQUID BEING EATEN BY A SPERM WHALE and it’s possibly the first ever confirmed video according to a friend at NOAA

10 YEAR OLD ME IS LOSING HER MIND (a thread 🧡)

24.09.2025 20:30 β€” πŸ‘ 29587    πŸ” 9954    πŸ’¬ 733    πŸ“Œ 1555

Troubling hairdos so far

24.09.2025 20:57 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

What’s the hack like then?

24.09.2025 20:53 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Useful reminder from Peter Kellner on the problems we refuse to acknowledge are getting better, and the politics of hopelessness that this breeds

open.substack.com/pub/kellnerp...

23.09.2025 06:29 β€” πŸ‘ 884    πŸ” 470    πŸ’¬ 37    πŸ“Œ 60

After Wellcome changed their #openaccess policy in 2021, they saw that publishers modify their workflows to detect WT funded papers and closed certain routes to publication. They also gave exceptions to "prestigious" authors while ECRs were not given the same opportunities 🀯 #OASPA2025

23.09.2025 08:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

Presumably Oxford got this for little or near nothing so that the developer can now say "Oxford uses it so it is great."

/1

19.09.2025 19:01 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Unrelated, probably

19.09.2025 19:07 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Have googled.

19.09.2025 19:04 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@richardmoorhead is following 20 prominent accounts