Andrea Reyes E (she/her)

#EU leaders should never belittle role of int'l law or apply it selectively - as they've done since #USA/#Israel's strikes on #Iran & retaliatory strikes on neighboring countries.

It goes against #EU values & its long-term interests.

Our take 👇
www.hrw.org/news/2026/03... @eudiplomacy.bsky.social

“My little girl was completely burned” > this is what the Dutch government and EC president & ministers think is OK.
We are lead by vile folk.

Stellar Stella 🥰

Huil harder, fascistisch propagandavod

Thinking of the climate scientist who recently posted here how helpful Claude was and asked if there was a European alternative 🤔 Surely if it is EU made, it can't be evil? It is not like we have our own freaks that get excited about incarcerating & drowning ppl (Frontex et al?).

This applies to everything. Ppl feel it's good on what they don't know well cause it is made to look like it knows + our assumptions of technology. When one points out this then ppl will say: ofc you need to check it. But... if you don't know the topic or coding well, well...

😱 human or sloppy?

Participated at a deliberative assembly (Leiden) on FAIR assessment re:GenAI. Plagiarism was not mentioned as an issue, the focus was "when is it fair to use it as students & lecturers." I get that ppl are desperate cause they have to grade, but a more fundamental discussion was avoided.

Yan Ge | It cannot read the human heart A friend in China messaged me on WeChat. ‘What are your thoughts on the plagiarism scandal?’‘What scandal?’ I...

when you are an author (or a student) putting in texts even "just for editing" into gen-AI, you are at risk of plagiarism bec this is how the algorithm works. in old-fashioned academic integrity lingo, you participate a mass "collusion". we end up with 30 essays with the same structure & argument

Yeah, it's cursed. I'll bet my lunch money that many ppl at Leiden would think this is actually a good idea 🫠

And now you’ll see a group historically known as unicorn hunters, whose defining trait is an enduring interest in a figure that declines inclusion in their ecosystem.

Mi vida...

handwritten page from the XVIII. It says Un Quenpiz.

Un que...? Aw, it is KEMPIS! #BookHistory

AI and Ethics AI and Ethics seeks to promote informed debate and discussion of the ethical, regulatory, and policy implications that arise from the development of AI. It ...

CFP, AI Resistance, Refusal, Reclamation & Reimagining: Ethical Imperatives and Emerging Practices! Note "This collection is focused ...on the strategies & actions of individuals, communities, organisations & collectives to actively resist, refuse, reimagine & reclaim 'artificial intelligence."

Do they say how would AI add to the quality? Cause the experiences on the floor do not support that, not to mention what it means in use (and capture) of resources.

Succes voor de gezondheid! 🦋

Een groener en gezonder Den Haag. Natuurlijk heeft de Partij voor de Dieren daarvoor gezorgd.

Met jouw stem maken we Den Haag nog groener en gezonder. Kies 18 maart Partij voor de Dieren, natuurlijk.💚

I have seen a lot of cursed stuff in my time in academia but this is among the *most* cursed.
Grammarly is generating miniature LLMs based on academic work so that users can have their writing ‘reviewed’ by experts like David Abulafia, who died less than two months ago.

No matter where you are, they’re using the same playbook

Nederland is geen cafetaria maar een snackbar waar alleen halfgebakte friet met joppiesaus wordt verkocht. Een soort groundhogday-hel-snackbar.

🇪🇸 Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez: “It is possible to be against a hateful regime, as Spanish society as a whole is against the Iranian regime, and at the same time be against an unjustified, dangerous military intervention.”

A handwritten text from the XVIII. Underlines: Quevedo en un Tomo, Volexia de Dios en

#SOSpalaeography #BookHistory I am trying to decipher what it says for the Quevedo. It seems it says Volexía. Could also be Volesoía. Quevedo has a book Politica de Dios but cannot find any title that starts with V. Any ideas?

Als ik typt wat ik denk word ik verbannen.

YouWinTheInternet.gif

That thread is so funny. I have USian colleagues (among them a professor of history) in the EU who use the term to refer to themselves. Yet in this moment in history some folk need to feel offended by it and inform *everybody* (obv adding how rational they are). LOL

SadVerySad.gif

A closed jar of pickled gherkins, with a white printed label showing the title and author of the poem. The gherkins look like they're past their due date.

#NewAcq: the #poem 'Jeroentje 9 voor, 9 na' by Jan Vanhaelen (1972). The text, on little sheets of paper, has been added to a jar of pickled gherkins. 🫙 🥒🥒🥒

Don't say: a nightmare for our preservation department.

Do say: an creative literary experiment!

EHC Antwerp 910872 📚💙 📖 📜

Maybe it’s because I’m a colonial historian but so many of these white nation states seem to behave exactly like they did in the 19th century: ‘your leaders aren’t right for you,’ ‘we’re only killing you/colonizing you/installing puppet leaders for your own good’

Text that reads, "what if, rather than talking about AI broadly, which includes a wide range of technologies that have existed long before ChatGPT’s 2022 launch and that have a variety various functionalities, purposes, and implications, we use more specific terms like “(text/image/code) generative AI,” “LLMs,” or “chatbots”? What if rather than talking about “AI” writing, we identified LLM outputs as “synthetic text,” “synthetic media,” or simply “output”? What if we stopped saying that LLMs can “read” or “think,”—which they can’t—and instead described what is occurring in these moments as “processing”? What if, rather than “hallucination,” we used “inaccuracy,” “error,” “misinformation,” or even “disinformation”? How might we, as rhetoricians and as computers and writing scholars, use our expertise to more critically study the discourses and rhetorics that are used to discuss these products, in ways that go beyond isolated experiences and single use cases, to analyze the broader social, political, and global contexts in which generative AI is embedded, including how it might function to “reinforce dominant ideologies and power structures”? And how might we then build systems and infrastructures that meaningfully take up what we find from such analyses?"

In this talk, I interrogated the use of the word "critical" in conversations about generative AI in education, and argue for care and precision in how we talk about these products. wacclearinghouse.org/docs/proceed...

Check out the full Proceedings here: wacclearinghouse.org/.../cw2025/p...

Part of an XVIII book. text: AñADESE AL FIN DE EELLA EL INFIERNO abierto, discurso postumo del mismo Autor. CON LICENCIA.

El Infierno Abierto

🫂