Idk it definitely seems more foggy than usual in this particular instance.

I've just about given up on knowing what's actually going on there because its been wildly contradictory claims coming in all over the place.

Man some of those replies though...

Some of the qts/replies to this make me wonder if there's a subset of people who think dating is supposed to be like some online game where you turn your pvp flag on and if you don't loudly proclaim it then any amorous inquiries whatsoever are sexual harassment.

THEY USED TO CALL US WOKE

NOW THEY CAN CALL US WIDE AWAKES

“How did you receive the foreigner? And did you receive him and welcome him or not?”

Pope Leo XIV challenges us to reflect on the moral cost of policies that target deeply-root immigrants and families.

Well in the American-British context it's being solved by the Brits catching all of our brainworms.

We'll rally round the flag, folks.
We'll rally round the flag.
Shouting the battlecry of freedom.

i hope this election cycle empowers everyone the next time a centrist liberal says to drop pro-trans and pro-immigrant rhetoric to enthusiastically tell them to shut the fuck up

It has been a good day. The gods are good. The Republic yet lives. Long live the Democrats! Long live the United States of America, free forevermore!

"The Union forever, hurrah boys hurrah! Down with the traitors and up with the stars!"

Good things are possible and we don’t have to settle.

I like that Dark Woke has a patriotism rooted in the Civil War. We need this.

THEY DO NOT BREAK US

THEY BREAK UPON THE CONTRAPTION IN JAY JONES' REC ROOM

BREAKING: After ICE refuses to allow detained migrants to receive the Eucharist, Pope Leo calls on Trump and Vance to respect migrants‘ dignity and religious liberty.

“They must allow ministers to assist with their needs. They've been separated from their families and no one knows what happens.”

Seeing this chart as an impressionable young man was a formative moment in my political development

You do it so you can market it as skills based not because its actually the best option.

i do think Dems should moderate on immigration in the sense that Dems should redesign our immigration policy to work like people think it works: you wait for a while (but not forever) to get into the country and then you wait for a while (but not forever) to become a citizen.

Technically a non-partisan office!

I recognize that but at the end of the day you can't design around a comprehensive failure of civic virtue.

I can believe this but the problem is that if you leave it to an NGO Republicans will end up appointing some of the officers and then you're stuck with them. At least government is theoretically accountable.

As someone from the West coast where that is the preferred way of doing things you absolutely do not want an NGO industrial complex running government functions.

This is the WA way.

It's essentially affinity fraud.

There's like a sui generis phenomenon where ditching him for a normal car guy CEO would probably make the company better but it would also crater the stock price.

They're like ground zero of annoying policies with questionable benefits and nowadays his whole politics is whatever personally annoys him.

Preparing myself for the next 4-5 months of trying to spot house numbers in the dark while it rains.