Don't move the goalposts. Gaza is irrelevant to this conversation. Do you believe that people who have beliefs that you deem fascist should be murdered, yes or no?

Wait, I just realized you said the 4th amendment. So you think the 4th amendment should be repealed? The FOURTH amendment. Are you sure?

Your quote is out of context and you know it. So what you are saying is that people with beliefs you deem fascist should be murdered, is that correct?

No one deserves to be shot for their beliefs or for their words. Remember, this "extremism" goes both ways. Do you want to be able to express yourself freely without being shot?

Oh please. Pick any random congressperson, federal judge, or politically aligned muckety-muck and do a deep dive ethics investigation on them. You'll find the same kind of dirt on all of them.

Look, it would be nice if we could summarize the issues of an entire nation in one simple word, but the fact is that's just not true. Certainly, racism has a history in our country that has influenced a lot of what is going on here now. But there is a lot more to it and there are complex reasons.

Genuinely interested in your math here. The gross world product is about $80T. Divide that by 8B people you get $10k per person, not $1M.

Actually yes, dissenting opinions, even negative ones, are diversity. I don't hate leftist radicals. I just don't want my entire feed full of them and their mindless Trump hate.

Where did I say anything remotely fascist? And saying I'm not a fan of leftist radicals isn't hate. Telling someone who has a different political ideology that they are unwelcome, that is hate. I didn't say you shouldn't be here. I prefer not to see posts by people like you. See the difference?

Sure bc the absolute best thing for everyone involved is to ensconce ourselves in separate little echo chambers and never hear a contrasting opinion every again. How about instead of "f off back to x" you recommend me some nonpolitical or nonextremist people to follow?

Yes bc echo chambers are so much better than spaces with diverse opinions.

Yes! Oddly enough x is actually more politically balanced now that do many liberals left (CNN reported on this) but someone really needs to create a politics-free social media space.

I have the same issue and it's really hard to find people to follow bc everyone on here is a TDS-infected, smug leftwing lunatic.

His influence is vast and powerful whether you like it or not. Literally the whole would has changed how they interact with the US since he got elected the 2nd time.

Cool. So you're ok with Mein Kampf, the Turner Diaries, and The Great Replacement being in school libraries?

Definitions matter. But, even if it we call it a "ban", it's not bad to limit potentially harmful content. Or are you ok with any book on any subject being in a grade school library?

That is unfortunate and should not have happened. Can we agree that sex ed in middle school is generally a good thing? This does not negate the fact that there are many books that are inappropriate for young readers and that restricting access to such material is not a ban.

First you were woke, now you are awakening.

Why is it so important to you that young children learn all about sex? Also, sex ed is not the same as restricting erotica in school libraries.

You're shifting the goal posts. Sex ed is a totally different discussion than whether or not books dealing with mature themes should be considered banned just bc they aren't allowed in school libraries.

If a book is restricted from a school library, a student at that school can still bring the book to school and read it. Do you consider adult films "banned" bc they can't be shown in first grade classrooms?

All of these books are available for purchase or at libraries throughout the US. It is not illegal to sell, buy, or possess them. Ergo they are not banned. Restricted from some public spaces, yes.

This is not a one sided issue. Most people on both sides of the political spectrum for these criteria.