Brian Marron's Avatar

Brian Marron

@brianmarron.bsky.social

MoCo dad, attorney, amateur scholar athlete, HOA tamer, Good Troublemaker. Orioles, Ravens, Nats, Commanders, Caps, Terps and Survivor fan.

470 Followers  |  511 Following  |  1,291 Posts  |  Joined: 13.11.2024
Posts Following

Posts by Brian Marron (@brianmarron.bsky.social)

Preview
a close up of a man in a suit and tie ALT: a close up of a man in a suit and tie

Really?

06.03.2026 11:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
woody and buzz lightyear from toy story are standing next to each other and saying `` everywhere ! '' ALT: woody and buzz lightyear from toy story are standing next to each other and saying `` everywhere ! ''

Ultra vires ...

06.03.2026 01:42 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Ultra vires ...

06.03.2026 01:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a woman in a blue tank top is drinking from a mug ALT: a woman in a blue tank top is drinking from a mug
05.03.2026 19:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Good point. I think some organizations are already built and populated and have been for centuries. They just need better moral leadership. It starts with members pressing the issue about fundamental values. That's why CBS censored Talarico's Colbert interview. It is a vulnerability.

05.03.2026 11:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A man with the government has been at the last two hearings relating to the contempt claim. Both times, he sat in the section of the courtroom open only to parties and counsel. Although not at counsel’s table, Littman and Jean Lin, the other Justice Department lawyer present at both hearings, has repeatedly consulted with him during both hearings.

After today’s hearing β€” and after not being able to figure out for myself who he was after the last hearing β€” I asked him who he was.

I had my press pass visibly displayed and identified myself as a reporter. He said he didn’t want to do that.

I suggested that he must be a government official or employee, sitting where he was, and, if so, I asked incredulously if he really was not going to tell a reporter at a hearing who he was.

He said no.

Then, the people leaving β€” myself included β€” got to the elevator. Littman, Lin, mystery man, and two other people sitting with mystery man on the government side of the courtroom during the hearing on Wednesday were getting into the elevator.

Some of them were already in the elevator. When I stepped in, mystery man said he would wait for the next elevator. Everyone else then got out of the elevator.

Left in the elevator alone, I looked at these five adults β€” all of whom I believe have to be government employees, hence, paid by the public and allegedly working for the public β€” and was some combination of bemused and appalled.

β€œYou are all ridiculous,” I simply said.

The door closed.

A man with the government has been at the last two hearings relating to the contempt claim. Both times, he sat in the section of the courtroom open only to parties and counsel. Although not at counsel’s table, Littman and Jean Lin, the other Justice Department lawyer present at both hearings, has repeatedly consulted with him during both hearings. After today’s hearing β€” and after not being able to figure out for myself who he was after the last hearing β€” I asked him who he was. I had my press pass visibly displayed and identified myself as a reporter. He said he didn’t want to do that. I suggested that he must be a government official or employee, sitting where he was, and, if so, I asked incredulously if he really was not going to tell a reporter at a hearing who he was. He said no. Then, the people leaving β€” myself included β€” got to the elevator. Littman, Lin, mystery man, and two other people sitting with mystery man on the government side of the courtroom during the hearing on Wednesday were getting into the elevator. Some of them were already in the elevator. When I stepped in, mystery man said he would wait for the next elevator. Everyone else then got out of the elevator. Left in the elevator alone, I looked at these five adults β€” all of whom I believe have to be government employees, hence, paid by the public and allegedly working for the public β€” and was some combination of bemused and appalled. β€œYou are all ridiculous,” I simply said. The door closed.

And, the story of the mystery man.

www.lawdork.com/p/lamberth-c...

05.03.2026 03:29 β€” πŸ‘ 1203    πŸ” 271    πŸ’¬ 50    πŸ“Œ 37
Post image

I am excited to share a new project from my organization, Democracy Rising Collaborative. We have launched a toolkit to empower lawyers and other civic leaders across the country to stand up for the Rule of Law. theruleoflawyers.org

1/THREAD

05.03.2026 01:31 β€” πŸ‘ 112    πŸ” 59    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 6

He is also unlawfully appointed.

04.03.2026 22:04 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

The "good" billionaires are incompetent at the "good" part since they are still holding billions. How hard is it to pay a handful of smart, trustworthy people to donate ones extreme excess? You could even hire a person to hire those people.

04.03.2026 11:39 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

The Deputy Attorney General just rescinded the policy against no knock warrants in most cases. That policy was an important public safety measure. Restricting their use saved lives. Breonna Taylor died because of one. www.cnn.com/2022/02/22/u...

04.03.2026 00:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1526    πŸ” 720    πŸ’¬ 72    πŸ“Œ 30
Preview
Barrett and Gorsuch Try, Fail to Offer Coherent Defenses of the Major Questions Doctrine The conservative justices are looking for any theory of the major questions doctrine other than the very obvious one.

Amy Coney Barrett & Neil Gorsuch did their damndest to defend the "major questions doctrine" in their tariffs concurrences

but even their justifications prove it's just a bullshit idea made up by Supreme Court justices and used in shitty ways for shitty reasons

ballsandstrikes.org/scotus/major...

03.03.2026 21:52 β€” πŸ‘ 126    πŸ” 33    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 1

When you are guaranteed to have the jury stacked with your friends and political dependants, nothing is impeachable (removable).

03.03.2026 17:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If both the bribes and the threats are pushing the judges on one side, what do we have on our side? The facts and the law and what's left of the judges' individual peronal integrity and morality, I guess.

I wish that was a fair fight.

03.03.2026 15:30 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The cost of MAGA face will soar? Maybe they'll care.

03.03.2026 15:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
U.S. Troops Were Told Iran War Is for β€œArmageddon,” Return of Jesus Advocacy group reports commanders giving similar messages at more than 30 installations in every branch of the military

EXCLUSIVE: At more than 30 installations, U.S. commanders told troops the war on Iran is a Christian war.

The Military Religious Freedom Foundation has been β€œinundated” with more than 110 complaints.

One NCO said they were told the U.S. war is to bring about Armageddon and the return of Jesus…

03.03.2026 01:54 β€” πŸ‘ 12797    πŸ” 6375    πŸ’¬ 1307    πŸ“Œ 4131

Adter seeing "Sinners" I had to kick myself for not giving Wallace a twin brother.

Very proud to watch his journey.

03.03.2026 10:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1204    πŸ” 97    πŸ’¬ 27    πŸ“Œ 2

Fuck cancer.

03.03.2026 01:30 β€” πŸ‘ 228    πŸ” 25    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 1

So if Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, oil prices will skyrocket. That will please: MBS (keeps Saudi oil pricey), Putin (oil revenues are financing the war on Ukraine), and Trump, whose Venezuelan oil is looking pretty special now. Coincidence? I don't think so.

03.03.2026 00:33 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Especially true for someone disqualified from being president. IYKYK.

02.03.2026 19:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The Venezuela plan to pocket the oil money himself?

02.03.2026 15:35 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

LOL. You made me check to see if they spelled it like that on the banner. Honestly, I wouldn't have been surprised.

02.03.2026 11:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Anyone know what company the government contracts to make these banners? It can't be a long list.

02.03.2026 04:37 β€” πŸ‘ 44    πŸ” 19    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

When he tries to run for a third term, I bet Trump will use the SCOTUS ruling in Trump v. Anderson to say that states can't bar him from the ballot under the 22nd amendment, either.

The SCOTUS gift that keeps on giving.

02.03.2026 00:06 β€” πŸ‘ 71    πŸ” 10    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 1

You fight the little battles you know you’re gonna lose and you keep piling them on and you stuff sessions and the courts with as much anti-fascist defense as they are with fascist takeover tactics. If cruelty is their intentionβ€”make them feel it, too, legally, financially, morally. Do the job.

28.02.2026 16:05 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

People make decisions about whether the law matters. Their names go on those decisions. Don't give up and assume they will ignore the law.

Make them choose. Make them own it.

28.02.2026 16:13 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Liver, chitterlins’, gizzards.

MOGA. Make Offal Great Again.

28.02.2026 02:06 β€” πŸ‘ 1045    πŸ” 196    πŸ’¬ 136    πŸ“Œ 13

This episode is about harvesting anger productively, taking up more responsibility, and drawing lines.

If science is a public good, defending it means showing upβ€”and saying no.

#ScienceCounterpunch
www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDTt...

27.02.2026 17:22 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

They found him. He died.

Another murder by our immigration goon squads

25.02.2026 20:29 β€” πŸ‘ 11843    πŸ” 5325    πŸ’¬ 387    πŸ“Œ 295

I'm still working on it, I promise.

"He's writin' a [Legal Memorandum.] Did he tell you? Apparently, the only thing keepin' us from liberty is a few more ideas."
―Arvel Skeen, Season 1, Episode 5, Star Wars: Andor

25.02.2026 21:02 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Supreme Court Says You Can’t File Tort Suits Against Postal Carriers Who Won’t Deliver Mail to Black People According to Clarence Thomas, mail that your mail carrier steals from you is really just β€œlost,” if you think about it.

You can't sue the government if postal workers accidentally drop the glassware you ordered or lose a letter from your pen pal

The Supreme Court ruled yesterday that this means you also can't sue if postal workers refuse to deliver your mail because you're Black

ballsandstrikes.org/scotus/posta...

25.02.2026 14:12 β€” πŸ‘ 2438    πŸ” 1106    πŸ’¬ 193    πŸ“Œ 194