Stop Schizoposting
10.12.2025 17:41 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0@bsf42069.bsky.social
My enemies are many, my equals are none Calling me a troll when Iโve made a valid argument doesnโt make me a troll. Grow up
Stop Schizoposting
10.12.2025 17:41 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I do.
Just answer me this. What is money? Like define it
Eh?
09.12.2025 01:29 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Loans arenโt an asset theyโre a liability. I think youโre butchering the โhe can borrow against sharesโ argument even more than itโs already butchered here
And again, thatโs literally not what Iโm saying. Learn. To. Read
Not what I said. Learn to read
09.12.2025 01:28 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0SpaceX doesnโt need money. They get money FOR PROVIDING A SERVICE
Itโs an exchange no different than paying your hairdresser for a haircut.
And thatโs not what I said lmao
Well yeah because Musks net worth is tired up in shares not a bank balance
08.12.2025 14:04 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0No Iโm saying you are an idiot who doesnโt understand currency
08.12.2025 14:04 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Thatโs not how money is made.
08.12.2025 02:18 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Go back to school lil bro
08.12.2025 02:18 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0NASA didnโt just give them money. It was a mutual exchange
NASA would be in a very poor situation with SpaceX
And no. It wasnโt a terrible design. It hasnโt created a monopoly either
Come on bro this is weak
It will be lmfao. Because the arrays are fucking huge
The latest block 1 is literally brighter
Half of our economic issues atm are because the government printed money for covid stimulus. And thatโs just stimulus, not even close to meeting deficit
I beg you. Never seek a position of power
You donโt understand how money works do you? Yes. The government can go broke
Yes the government distributes currency
For fuck sake. Do you think they can just print more? Do you know what happens to countries when they try that?
Thatโs not how currency actually works lol.
06.12.2025 21:52 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0NASA also didnโt create SpaceX. And to claim the CCP messed it up is absurd frankly
Also not once was it a single source competition. Again, thatโs just false
Emotional? Bro heโs not emotionally favourable
And thatโs projecting a bias in and of itself to assume he will be emotionally attracted because of weak reasoning
And no. There is not financial bias. Thatโs been established and will be routed out by the ethics committee
No itโs like saying you donโt rely on Ford to make pickups.
06.12.2025 20:08 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0You too
06.12.2025 02:42 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Yeah they have deep ties. Doesnโt change the nature of many of their MOUs
Also, as a note. Starlink isnโt primarily a D2C provider. This is more of a side hustle for them atm
AST getting a significant market share in the sector doesnโt mean theyโre being outcompeted on their overall market
Not actually better really when theyโre significantly more disruptive
And itโs no surprise they have their own intentions. Why did you think they hoovered up spectrum rights?
They were quite literally referred to as the worst offenders by the IAU because of this. The block 2 sats will be even brighter (mag -1, as bright as Vega)
06.12.2025 02:30 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0And yes. There have been complaints
The current Block 1 sats are mag 0.3 at brightest (target is 7, so 300x brighter. Average is still 40x brighter min)
I mean as competitive. Their niche isnโt much wider than starlinks and Starlink has a head start despite a tortoise approach to rollout
20-40% share is whatโs projected. Starlink is currently at 92% in beta
The MOUs here are also exploratory deals. Starlinks are binding and commercial deals
06.12.2025 02:20 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0This is just how the two compete though. AST is bidding on quantity atm then having a solid market when they enter
Starlink has more agreements with operators but only a few for D2C because they prefer to have a working network and revenue potential before making deals
Never seek a position of power lol
If this is all you treat a means of exchange as
Do you know what happens when countries take the rookie error of just printing money?
Yeah they have some deals. But to claim theyโre going to be as competitive is a stretch
Thereโs also something that should be noted about the fact their sats are enormous and bright.
Very hard to scale that and meet astronomical targets
Florida Phoenix is not a valid source lol
I mean from the outset itโs saying they will โblock beachesโ by which they mean limited closures for launches not denial of public access
I suggest you widen your sources from clickbait tabloids who are feeding you a story not the truth
Use โ rely on. The U.S. absolutely does not rely on Starlink and Starshield is managed and operated by the pentagon
06.12.2025 02:07 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0