Sooo no actual elaboration on what exactly youโre referring to and no evidence that itโs bullshit then
Hey I heard from you guys that the laser communications was musk bs. Now itโs used widely
What makes this time any different?
@bsf42069.bsky.social
My enemies are many, my equals are none Calling me a troll when Iโve made a valid argument doesnโt make me a troll. Grow up
Sooo no actual elaboration on what exactly youโre referring to and no evidence that itโs bullshit then
Hey I heard from you guys that the laser communications was musk bs. Now itโs used widely
What makes this time any different?
Falcon was treated the same way as starship is now chief.
And Iโm just gonna ignore the schizophrenic ramblings you put after that
Failures have become less likely. And itโs still very much a prototype vehicle lol
Having a 50% success rate is actually quite good considering that starship is not some bog standard expendable launcher
What is?
06.10.2025 21:45 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I get that but many are just taking it as current which is why itโs very important to ensure people understand that thereโs are much bigger fishes to fry
Spaceflight emissions will need to increase by orders of magnitude to impact the same as even minor emissions such as videogames for example
Still both are absolutely dwarfed by ODS emissions from chemicals
06.10.2025 21:43 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Itโs not approaching those scales just yet
Currently ozone depletion from spaceflight is 0.1% with 0.012% being from entries. itโs more mass than micrometeorites for just aluminium but aluminium alone doesnโt deplete ozone itโs oxides that do
Micrometeorites donโt produce Al oxides like satellites
Yup
06.10.2025 21:37 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Theyโre definitely a fun company to follow. All are as a whole
More competition is good competition
Hating him is one thing. SpaceX is very different
06.10.2025 18:50 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Yeah thatโs true for many. But not true as a whole
Neither compete with the other and both have benefited greatly from the work theyโve done. Many simply hate SpaceX because itโs different from the cost+ structure
And youโre basing this onโฆ.
06.10.2025 18:49 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0which part?
06.10.2025 15:40 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0None. Because he doesnโt make or own them lol
If you mean SpaceX, for non test articles itโs probably 5 total in off nominal situations
With test articles near enough to 20 but that including early tanking tests
Oh definitely, space is hard and that was a VERY hard lesson
Must have been a wild experience
Bro has me blocked lol
06.10.2025 15:05 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0And Covid makes a โreturnโ every flu season. So are you referring to that or are you implying itโs going to become like 2020-2022 again?
06.10.2025 14:32 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Iโm literally not lol. Crazy how you want to immediately make this about Trump ngl
06.10.2025 14:28 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0So how does this apply to if their programs are long term or not?
06.10.2025 14:28 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0That stat is from the first gen sats which have started retirement (5 years since launch)
Newer Version 2 sats are expected to operate longer. Prop limits the current batches to 6-7 but SpaceX is preemptive in disposal
The guys a self taught maniac too (in the good way)
Built a rocket powered bike for example justโฆbecause why not?
Overall their biggest market is satellite manufacturing. Theyโre make pre made buses and sats that customers can buy and modify
As well as satellite components like solar cells and reaction wheels
Another funny thing is that he said heโd eat his hat if they developed a new larger launch vehicle and made their current vehicle reusable. To announce the former, he literally ate a hat
06.10.2025 14:17 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Theyโre not really a direct competitor. Theyโre in the small launch market but hoping to enter into the medium
Funnily enough Beck crashed out a few years ago because of SpaceX starting their ride-share program which ate up their market share
I think you are significantly underestimating the impact political whims have on NASA.
Theyโd love to think long term. But you canโt convince politicians that itโs worthwhile.
SLS and Orion are obviously not long term assets. Theyโre the cap for Artemisโs long term goals
SpaceX obviously is thinking long term. If they were only focused on Point A to Point B at a competitive rate theyโd have stuck with Falcon 9 and Heavy
Well I mean Apollo was never long term. It was a short program to meet political goals
Shuttle was thought up with the idea of being long term but due to many reasons never became so and wasnโt far reaching
Itโs no problem Iโve been there myself lol
06.10.2025 12:47 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Saturn V, nearly killed the crew numerous times. POGO wasnโt fixed and came back repeatedly
You can hate musk and also not spread blatant bullshit especially when NASA and SpaceX are allies not competitors no matter how you try to make them be.
You guys are no different than the MAGA lot. Period. Anyone who isnโt a mindless political droid can see it
Youโre just in denial of it in the same way theyโre in denial that theyโre just like you
Horseshoe theory has never been more real and it shows