BSF ๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง's Avatar

BSF ๐Ÿ€๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

@bsf42069.bsky.social

My enemies are many, my equals are none Calling me a troll when Iโ€™ve made a valid argument doesnโ€™t make me a troll. Grow up

234 Followers  |  127 Following  |  7,118 Posts  |  Joined: 22.10.2024  |  2.3767

Latest posts by bsf42069.bsky.social on Bluesky

Sooo no actual elaboration on what exactly youโ€™re referring to and no evidence that itโ€™s bullshit then

Hey I heard from you guys that the laser communications was musk bs. Now itโ€™s used widely

What makes this time any different?

07.10.2025 02:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Falcon was treated the same way as starship is now chief.

And Iโ€™m just gonna ignore the schizophrenic ramblings you put after that

06.10.2025 21:47 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Failures have become less likely. And itโ€™s still very much a prototype vehicle lol

Having a 50% success rate is actually quite good considering that starship is not some bog standard expendable launcher

06.10.2025 21:46 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

What is?

06.10.2025 21:45 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I get that but many are just taking it as current which is why itโ€™s very important to ensure people understand that thereโ€™s are much bigger fishes to fry

Spaceflight emissions will need to increase by orders of magnitude to impact the same as even minor emissions such as videogames for example

06.10.2025 21:44 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Still both are absolutely dwarfed by ODS emissions from chemicals

06.10.2025 21:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Itโ€™s not approaching those scales just yet

Currently ozone depletion from spaceflight is 0.1% with 0.012% being from entries. itโ€™s more mass than micrometeorites for just aluminium but aluminium alone doesnโ€™t deplete ozone itโ€™s oxides that do

Micrometeorites donโ€™t produce Al oxides like satellites

06.10.2025 21:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yup

06.10.2025 21:37 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Theyโ€™re definitely a fun company to follow. All are as a whole

More competition is good competition

06.10.2025 18:52 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Hating him is one thing. SpaceX is very different

06.10.2025 18:50 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yeah thatโ€™s true for many. But not true as a whole

Neither compete with the other and both have benefited greatly from the work theyโ€™ve done. Many simply hate SpaceX because itโ€™s different from the cost+ structure

06.10.2025 18:50 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

And youโ€™re basing this onโ€ฆ.

06.10.2025 18:49 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

which part?

06.10.2025 15:40 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

None. Because he doesnโ€™t make or own them lol

If you mean SpaceX, for non test articles itโ€™s probably 5 total in off nominal situations

With test articles near enough to 20 but that including early tanking tests

06.10.2025 15:39 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Oh definitely, space is hard and that was a VERY hard lesson

Must have been a wild experience

06.10.2025 15:38 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Bro has me blocked lol

06.10.2025 15:05 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

And Covid makes a โ€˜returnโ€™ every flu season. So are you referring to that or are you implying itโ€™s going to become like 2020-2022 again?

06.10.2025 14:32 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Iโ€™m literally not lol. Crazy how you want to immediately make this about Trump ngl

06.10.2025 14:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

So how does this apply to if their programs are long term or not?

06.10.2025 14:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

That stat is from the first gen sats which have started retirement (5 years since launch)

Newer Version 2 sats are expected to operate longer. Prop limits the current batches to 6-7 but SpaceX is preemptive in disposal

06.10.2025 14:25 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The guys a self taught maniac too (in the good way)

Built a rocket powered bike for example justโ€ฆbecause why not?

06.10.2025 14:18 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Overall their biggest market is satellite manufacturing. Theyโ€™re make pre made buses and sats that customers can buy and modify

As well as satellite components like solar cells and reaction wheels

06.10.2025 14:17 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Another funny thing is that he said heโ€™d eat his hat if they developed a new larger launch vehicle and made their current vehicle reusable. To announce the former, he literally ate a hat

06.10.2025 14:17 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Theyโ€™re not really a direct competitor. Theyโ€™re in the small launch market but hoping to enter into the medium

Funnily enough Beck crashed out a few years ago because of SpaceX starting their ride-share program which ate up their market share

06.10.2025 14:17 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I think you are significantly underestimating the impact political whims have on NASA.

Theyโ€™d love to think long term. But you canโ€™t convince politicians that itโ€™s worthwhile.

06.10.2025 14:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

SLS and Orion are obviously not long term assets. Theyโ€™re the cap for Artemisโ€™s long term goals

SpaceX obviously is thinking long term. If they were only focused on Point A to Point B at a competitive rate theyโ€™d have stuck with Falcon 9 and Heavy

06.10.2025 14:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Well I mean Apollo was never long term. It was a short program to meet political goals

Shuttle was thought up with the idea of being long term but due to many reasons never became so and wasnโ€™t far reaching

06.10.2025 14:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Itโ€™s no problem Iโ€™ve been there myself lol

06.10.2025 12:47 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Saturn V, nearly killed the crew numerous times. POGO wasnโ€™t fixed and came back repeatedly

You can hate musk and also not spread blatant bullshit especially when NASA and SpaceX are allies not competitors no matter how you try to make them be.

06.10.2025 12:09 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

You guys are no different than the MAGA lot. Period. Anyone who isnโ€™t a mindless political droid can see it

Youโ€™re just in denial of it in the same way theyโ€™re in denial that theyโ€™re just like you

Horseshoe theory has never been more real and it shows

06.10.2025 12:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@bsf42069 is following 19 prominent accounts