Social media created this nonsense idea that not exposing yourself to hatred is isolationist. Choosing to not spend your free time with bigots isnβt living in a bubble. I donβt need to know whatβs going on at X. I wonβt be smarter or more knowledgeable or empathic by being there. Neither will you.
01.03.2026 03:58 β
π 17443
π 3266
π¬ 368
π 162
Bright spot seeing CCRI President @maryannefranks.bsky.social honored with the NAACP Digital Civil Rights Award!
28.02.2026 11:53 β
π 10
π 1
π¬ 0
π 0
"The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding."
-- Brandeis, dissenting, Olmstead v. U.S. (1928)
26.02.2026 15:29 β
π 8
π 4
π¬ 0
π 0
Heads up, folks. You have calls to make!
23.02.2026 14:37 β
π 382
π 230
π¬ 8
π 8
At some point we have to face the sad truth that this array of Administration miscreants are living their HS fantasies. Under what other circumstances would a group of athletes welcome this guy into a locker room celebration?
23.02.2026 04:06 β
π 1844
π 447
π¬ 138
π 10
They all just wanted in on it.
βSwamp,β my ass.
23.02.2026 04:14 β
π 3168
π 746
π¬ 87
π 13
Add this to research that suggests that as Musk took over Twitter (but before Twitter became X), the algorithm there was serving up content that leaned markedly to the right, even for users whose networks leaned left. www.arxiv.org/abs/2512.06129
19.02.2026 20:31 β
π 152
π 82
π¬ 7
π 0
So SCOTUS, with its fabricated-out-of-thin-air immunity doctrine, has actually made American presidents less accountable than LITERAL royalty.
19.02.2026 10:50 β
π 11215
π 3146
π¬ 30
π 139
Here we go.
15.02.2026 22:40 β
π 211
π 33
π¬ 23
π 4
Yes he was handsome. But give some credit to the meticulous attention his wife Anna Murray Douglass paid to his care, his home, & the presentation of his garments. It was Anna, a free woman who he met in Baltimore, who out of her meager savings gave FD the money for his train ride to escape.
14.02.2026 22:27 β
π 3617
π 774
π¬ 29
π 21
Letβs go Maryland Senate!
14.02.2026 22:32 β
π 654
π 119
π¬ 8
π 0
The best case scenario is that Trump will waste $38 billion. The more likely outcome is that these will become warehouses of human suffering, and a permanent stain on America's history.
14.02.2026 03:09 β
π 1174
π 396
π¬ 36
π 13
papers.ssrn.com
Date Written: February 09, 2026
Abstract
This Article develops the concept of digital ethnonationalism, which refers to the design and operation of opaque algorithmic systems and policies that reproduce racial and religious hierarchy and cultural homogeneity at scale. Recent federal reversals of anti-bias Al safeguards (including in consumer lending, housing, employment, procurement, and more), the stigmatizing of equity as "ideological," and pressure on platforms to relax content moderation standards exemplify this turn. Digital ethnonationalism is not confined to the United States. It is intertwined with U.S. pursuits of global technological dominance, the resurgence of nativist and ethnonationalist movements abroad (for instance, Germany and France), and the marginalization of the emerging global majority in shaping technology standards, governance, and norms. Ethnonationalist logic is increasingly embedded in digital technologies adopted worldwide. This Article does not seek to "solve" digital ethnonationalism but instead to lay the groundwork for a research agenda. It makes visible digital ethnonationalism as a growing challenge given its integration into critical infrastructure in diverse, multiethnic societies. For those committed to liberal, pluralistic democracy, the first step is to identify digital ethnonationalism and to develop strategies to recognize, cabin, contain, and navigate it within technology development, governance, law and policy. There is no silver bullet-effective responses are multifaceted and context-specific. Still, several core principles should guide action, including fairness (mitigating bias and proxy discrimination), pluralism (advancing linguistic, cultural, and epistemic diversity), autonomy (constraining covert behavioral manipulation and preserving meaningful human agency), and dignity (treating marginalized groups and women with respect so that they can participate in the networked age).
Keywords: digital ethnonβ¦
Digital ethnonationalism (noun) β
βthe design & operation of opaque algorithmic systems & policies that reproduce racial & religious hierarchy & cultural homogeneity at scale.β
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
New paper @spenceroverton.bsky.social @daniellecitron.bsky.social explores
technofascism.
13.02.2026 14:05 β
π 2
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
OpenAI has a new βhealthβ appβ¦ π€¨
From the latest episode of Mystery AI Hype Theater 3000, with @emilymbender.bsky.social. From episode 71: A Bad Case of Hype-itis.
13.02.2026 21:01 β
π 45
π 14
π¬ 3
π 5
What It Means to Be a White βRace Traitorβ
MUST READ from @nhannahjones.bsky.social today.
www.nytimes.com/2026/02/13/m...
13.02.2026 16:04 β
π 364
π 147
π¬ 13
π 15
She Resigned as Penn President After a Controversial Hearing. Now Sheβs Back.
Liz Magill, the former president of the University of Pennsylvania, will be the new dean of Georgetown Universityβs law school.
This is terrific news! Liz Magill is a great choice to lead Georgetown Law.
Regarding the controversyβElise Stefanik ambushed Magill at that hearing with the evident goal of smearing her as an antisemite, which she is not (obviously). UPenn's loss is our gain.
www.politico.com/news/magazin...
13.02.2026 17:00 β
π 204
π 37
π¬ 4
π 1
@georgetownlaw.bsky.social could not be luckier with Liz Magill as their new Dean!! Iβm so excited for my colleagues there and for all of us in the profession. Liz is a brilliant scholar, extraordinary generous colleague and wonderful human. Thrilling!! view.info.georgetown.edu?vawpToken=3L...
13.02.2026 16:19 β
π 9
π 1
π¬ 0
π 0
As constitutional interpretation becomes rooted ever more deeply into the past the Constitution seemingly has less and less to say about our present. It seems to offer little principled direction for navigating what many describe as a constitutional crisis. On questions ranging from birthright citizenship and territorial acquisition to aggressive federal immigration enforcement, executive intervention beyond U.S. borders, and the βhistory and traditionβ of annexed territories such as Hawaiβi, the Constitutionβs familiar sources of authority and traditional narratives seem to falter. These domains appear to tread into empty constitutional landscapes and newly discovered territory.
Scholars have increasingly traced this backward-looking orientation to conservative legal movements of the last half century. But the impulse to seek constitutional meaning in the past is not new. Long before the Supreme Court embraced originalism, and long before the modern turn to βhistory and tradition,β jurists and scholars assumed that the Constitution could not be understood apart from its origins and development. Constitutional meaning was thought to emerge from historical inquiry. The question, then, was not whether constitutional interpretation should engage with the past, but which pastβand through what historical method.
This Foreword argues that our present constitutional impasse stems, at least in part, not solely from excessive attention to the past but from fixation on a particular kind of past. Modern constitutional theory, I suggest, has been increasingly bounded by what scholars in the historical and social sciences call a methodological nationalism. By nationalism, I do not mean to invoke familiar federalism debates. Nor do I use the term nationalism as a pejorative or a critique of those whose research centers the United States and its founders.
Rather, in identifying mainstream constitutional theory as operating within a nationalist frame, I seek to draw attention tβ¦
New Foreword up on SSRN, previewing new projects on the history of constitutional history and what it can teach about legal frameworks at the heart of our "constitutional crisis"-federal Indian law, territorial law, expansion, immigration, and executive power. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
13.02.2026 15:10 β
π 47
π 20
π¬ 2
π 0
For decades the tech industry has insulated itself from criticism by leveraging the rhetoric of progressivism & benignity towards the disenfranchised & disabled, w promises of βaccessβ & βdemocratizationβ that their products afford. We canβt stop them using this lang but we can stop falling for it.
13.02.2026 12:21 β
π 178
π 76
π¬ 1
π 3
Hey @ssrn.bsky.social: why have you stripped the publication information from articles posted on your site?
13.02.2026 13:00 β
π 27
π 8
π¬ 5
π 0
When the CIA did this to the Senate it was one of the biggest intel scandals of the 21st century. But here itβs not just a huge scandal, itβs dumb: Pam Bondi is so bad at her job she brought the evidence herself to an open congressional hearing. www.theguardian.com/world/2014/j...
12.02.2026 00:20 β
π 3114
π 1218
π¬ 56
π 34