@soylentc0la.bsky.social
Baltimore-based amateur-everything.
That's NYC, but yes, it's from today.
18.10.2025 21:07 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Easy solution: Zuck 'em.
18.10.2025 19:47 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I didn't think this site used an algorithmic timeline. I just see the accounts I follow/stuff those people repost or reply to.
17.10.2025 23:34 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Donnie is Santos' Little Helper.
17.10.2025 23:27 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Seriously. I don't keep up with apple stuff too much, but even I know they haven't had the (useful) home button in ages!
16.10.2025 23:37 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Two kinds of people I don't defend: bigots, and people who plaster their videos with those stupid animated emoji.
16.10.2025 23:32 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Bazdmeg.
16.10.2025 20:48 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0A poster depicting Kermit the Frog with his fist raised, and a caption that reads "HOP".
A poster depicting Kermit the Frog wearing a beret, and a caption that reads "RESIST".
(Full disclosure: these were lazily made with the Pixel Studio app on my phone when I should've been working and not infringing copyright. I am probably the worst.)
16.10.2025 20:44 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Also saw this: www.latimes.com/california/s...
16.10.2025 13:49 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Agreed. The "you're only reaching like-minded individuals" argument isn't one against taking action, it's one for expanding your audience.
16.10.2025 12:52 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0More sources:
www.latimes.com/california/s...
OK, so this is being corroborated by additional sources now, so it looks more likely ๐ฌ
www.latimes.com/california/s...
I accept that it's likely me being cranky, shouting at clouds, but the shift from forums to "platforms" really soured things.
There was still plenty of bullshit and drama on forums and message boards, but there was also no software designed to optimize for it in the name of engagement.
Nope. Sorry for the short answer, but between Amazon, Google, and Apple, you don't really have much control. ๐
16.10.2025 00:42 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Yeah, mobile apps are designed to bypass the kind of control you have in a full browser. There are still system wide methods to block ads in mobile apps. And there are alternative YouTube clients that are miles better. But that's the sort of thing to read about in a better format than a BSky post ๐
16.10.2025 00:40 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0But to answer your actual question, it's an extension for some browsers. Essentially, there are "blacklists" of ad servers. When a page tries to load an ad, instead of reaching the ad server, it gets denied. You just see blank space where the ad would be. The web is borderline unusable without.
16.10.2025 00:37 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Mobile "apps" are a whole other issue, and require system wide ad blocking. Some ways are easy, some are free. Few are both.
But most of them are just wrappers for a website anyway so they're kind of unnecessary.
The person I replied to mentioned sketchy YouTube ads. A good ad blocker will block them.
This particular one will work on Firefox desktop or mobile (unless you are in an iPhone/iPad because apple only allows you to use their browser engine, so other browsers are still essentially worse safari).
She's being paid to gut it. Like those liquidation companies.
16.10.2025 00:29 โ ๐ 19 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Both can be true.
16.10.2025 00:27 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Rejoice
16.10.2025 00:24 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0They get too much money from telcos and they essentially live online. It'll never happen.
16.10.2025 00:23 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 1It's a win-win. The recurring fees just pile up anyway.
The prices keep rising.
The ads keep getting added to paid tiers.
The shared accounts that were selling points are now another upcharge.
The apps track and sell your activity.
Read. Buy Local. Pirate. Buy physical. Adblock. Go outside!
Annoying cops is simply not a crime.
They are not being stopped from doing their (shitty, despicable) job, and giraffe man should not be stopped from telling them why they suck.
Pretty straightforward protected political speech.
Some people are just accustomed to having lots of ball room.
ยฏ\_(ใ)_/ยฏ
If it's true, they'll look like idiots either way. And I'm with you on "need to see something to back this up".
16.10.2025 00:01 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Anything to back this up? Only thing I've found so far is this Meidas post and...MSN spam quoting said post.
15.10.2025 23:56 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0