It is a great paper, and to my knowledge there has been no meaningful rejoinder. It seems to be a bit of a "genre killer" for the type of paper it evaluates.
07.03.2026 19:55 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It is a great paper, and to my knowledge there has been no meaningful rejoinder. It seems to be a bit of a "genre killer" for the type of paper it evaluates.
07.03.2026 19:55 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
I finally gave "Is open science neoliberal?" by @uyguntunc.bsky.social @mntunc.bsky.social and Eper a close read. It made sense of critiques that did not resonate w/ how I understand the reform movement.
Are there rejoinders defending the neoliberal attribution or challenging this description?
The say βI am aliveβ comic
Iβm reminded of this comic almost every time I check LinkedIn
07.03.2026 19:27 β π 1219 π 243 π¬ 7 π 5Empirically, yes, but before that there were several purely verbal defenses. This is another one. doi.org/10.1177/1745...
03.03.2026 16:40 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0One of the classic instances of the latter is Stroebe & Strack (2014). They did not use the term "hidden moderator," as I believe that was applied later by people criticizing the argument. doi.org/10.1177/1745...
03.03.2026 16:02 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It seems that you are living in an antiquated world filled with needless suffering and catastrophic wrongness.
03.03.2026 14:14 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0bsky.app/profile/psya...
03.03.2026 03:37 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Interesting. My session was unfortunately at the same time. I was interested to hear the quality of the arguments, but this suggests I didn't miss much...
28.02.2026 23:50 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Zotero always comes through.
26.02.2026 18:56 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 02(Simine is not sure that she ever said this but agrees that it sounds like something she would have said; personal communication Dec 14, 2021)
I searched my zotero library for 'personal communication', because these tend to be interesting and can illustrate how science really works. I was not disappointed, the most recent one in my library was this from @syeducation.bsky.social. More of this! doi.org/10.36850/mr11
26.02.2026 18:23 β π 36 π 7 π¬ 3 π 0A conference session notice that reads, "CANCELLED: ChatGPT Ate My Study: AI and the Future of Data"
This is a bit too on the nose #SPSP2026
26.02.2026 14:55 β π 14 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Great piece!
24.02.2026 23:01 β π 7 π 3 π¬ 1 π 0You all are so wrong about all of this that Bluesky stopped notifying me of your responses.
25.02.2026 02:41 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thanks! And yeah, my post definitely covers a lot of similar ground as your article. As I tried to describe, I do think it is difficult, perhaps even futile, to make objective claims about utility due to how we differentially assign value to various aspects of research.
25.02.2026 02:37 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thanks!!
25.02.2026 02:34 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Oh yeah, fully agree. There is certainly more at play than what I described!
24.02.2026 20:04 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0π
24.02.2026 20:03 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0You liked that I cited you so much that you said it twice! Anyway, glad you liked it (beyond the citation).
24.02.2026 20:02 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
This is a very useful post, in my opinion! I enjoyed the process of reading it, and the product of that will be me referencing it frequently in conversations and having it inform my thinking.
Let me explain why I like it...
1/5
Lots of you DO it, none of you LIKE it, despite what you claim....I learned in my psychology classes that self report is not reliable.
24.02.2026 18:37 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Do you really "like it" or are you perhaps just a prisoner to your antiquated ways?
24.02.2026 17:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0I cover similar ground in my nice, new, fresh, blog post. Hey, I even cite you! getsyeducated.substack.com/p/valuing-th...
24.02.2026 17:28 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Great post elaborating on how (not) to use AI (and technology) in scientific research!
24.02.2026 15:53 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0A nice, level-headed post about the motivations and outcomes of using technology (including LLMs) in research that you care about.
24.02.2026 16:42 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Thanks, Moin -- A lot of my thinking about AI use is a jumbled, grumpy mess, so your process/product distinction is super clarifying. BTW I'm one of those references-by-hand sadists (it helps me better memorize specific publications for future offhand reference)
24.02.2026 15:12 β π 8 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0That you freely admit this is a true sign of our crumbling society. (regardless, I'm glad that you found the post useful!)
24.02.2026 15:40 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Interesting post!
24.02.2026 15:07 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0New post! "Valuing the Process vs. the Product in Research," in which I try to describe some of the tensions around using GenAI/LLMs in scientific research, and why it can be so difficult to have productive conversations on the topic. getsyeducated.substack.com/p/valuing-th...
24.02.2026 14:19 β π 48 π 24 π¬ 7 π 7Submit it to PCI Psychology today! psych.peercommunityin.org
20.02.2026 16:45 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0