The thing is the met never could exist except for wealthy donors, so even if young people started showing up and selling out every show they'd still be in trouble. Really need some billionaires
09.03.2026 15:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The thing is the met never could exist except for wealthy donors, so even if young people started showing up and selling out every show they'd still be in trouble. Really need some billionaires
09.03.2026 15:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Not sure how you solve this issue unfortunately :(
09.03.2026 15:05 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Lots of young people at porgy and Bess and kavalier and klay. When Akhnaten played it was a ton of young people, but few of us are dropping $200 to see die frau ohne schatten (despite it being really good)
09.03.2026 14:58 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0I guess he forgot about this footnote because my family did not become super rich in the 2000s off of shale gas :(
06.03.2026 20:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Fun fact my grandpa wrote his undergrad thesis on oil prices in the 1950s and buried in a footnote was: "The US has vast deposits of natural gas in the Eastern US that have not been economically viable to extract. Should oils prices skyrocket it is like technology would develop for these reserves"
06.03.2026 20:27 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Shale gas is back on the menu boys!!
06.03.2026 20:16 — 👍 20 🔁 2 💬 2 📌 0
An entirely unserious position from Schlossberg:
- There is no funding available to fix these complexes via Section 9, which is why they're in the state they are in.
- These buildings are nearly a century old and in terrible condition.
- Rebuilding is actually *cheaper* than repair
There's a building on Christopher and 7th that has a 1929 rendering for a 19 story building that was never built. I dream of pitching it
05.03.2026 03:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0That still exists directly to the North. You can see the chapel behind the parking lot.
05.03.2026 02:54 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Only because of recent pressure! Not that long ago it would have to be no taller than it's neighbor
05.03.2026 02:53 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0People did wild things back in the day. Potentially it was to be replaced with a taller building prior to the depression, maybe there was serious damage, who knows!
05.03.2026 01:57 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0An 11 story Romanesque Revival building
Here's the building
05.03.2026 01:56 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 1What will blow your mind is that before it was a gas station it was an 11 story building: www.oldnyc.org#720791f-a
05.03.2026 01:37 — 👍 19 🔁 1 💬 3 📌 0Not the headline I would have gone with. Buildings can be safer with one stair than with two, especially if you reduce the length of the corridor and number of apartments per floor.
04.03.2026 15:50 — 👍 18 🔁 5 💬 5 📌 0Article here: www.nytimes.com/2026/03/04/b...
04.03.2026 15:41 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Someone expressing anger about a NY times article about single staircase reform
People should read the article! The whole point is that the fire safety rules aren't actually making anyone that much safer!
04.03.2026 15:40 — 👍 3 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0Each county has to have a sheriff (and SF county = SF city)
04.03.2026 02:25 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Normally state law requires a separate sheriffs dept to handle civil things. So you kind of have to keep them separate.
04.03.2026 02:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
The crazy thing about this is how over the course of decades it has literally contributed to the housing crisis! All of the SROs that kept people out of homelessness were lost to this practice!
www.thecity.nyc/2023/08/24/1...
Reporters building their brands does not buy a fixer, soundman, cameraman, producer, editor, flack jackets, helmets, satellite transmission, lawyers, etc. TV done right is incredibly resource intensive.
27.02.2026 00:15 — 👍 30 🔁 3 💬 2 📌 0They actually outlawed it in parts of Chicago but only on blocks that had yet to majority convert
26.02.2026 14:55 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I love this article, because it's such a clear illustrations of an important point. The West Village is becoming a victim of its own strict zoning. The little details about the inhabitants show us how (thread).
26.02.2026 14:25 — 👍 62 🔁 15 💬 5 📌 0Hopefully this list gets long quickly!
25.02.2026 03:29 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Something unthinkable happened today: Vickie Paladino, a NIMBY Republican, voted to approve new housing in her district.
Why now? November's @YesOnAffHousing.bsky.social ballot measures have completely changed the landscape of housing approvals in NYC.
WATCH: MAGA CM Vickie Paladino is crashing out because props 2-5 will allow affordable housing to be built in her Queens district.
These changes were designed as a backstop to prevent abuse of member deference, and ensure that every neighborhood does its part. They're working!
An 8 story apartment building
A literal country club is being replaced with an apartment building.
Previously through "member deference" Paladino would be able to block this project. However, with the new "affordable housing appeals board" if the council rejects it the Mayor and BP can approve it (and indicated they would)
Part III
23.02.2026 23:31 — 👍 15 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Part II
23.02.2026 23:31 — 👍 14 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0
NYC Council Member Vickie Paladino (R) crashing out over a new apartment building in her district that will likely be approved tomorrow due to the "Affordable Housing Appeals Board" adopted by voters last November.
It's long, but the whole 7 minutes is worth it!