Fraser Raeburn's Avatar

Fraser Raeburn

@fraserraeburn.bsky.social

Historian interested in foreign fighters, transnational solidarities, emotion, anti-fascism and the Spanish Civil War. Currently based at @uvahumanities.bsky.social. Author 'Scots and the Spanish Civil War' (EUP, 2020). He/him.

4,211 Followers  |  859 Following  |  342 Posts  |  Joined: 17.10.2023  |  1.9099

Latest posts by fraserraeburn.bsky.social on Bluesky

Between Thompson and the Global: Reflections on Labour History Today

We invite papers for a workshop entitled “Between Thompson and the Global: Rethinking Labour History Today”, to be held at the University of Warwick on 26-27 June 2026. This workshop will seek to bring together historians of labour to collectively reflect on a large historiographical shift that has taken place over the last two decades, from the social history of labour (in national contexts) to global and trans-national labour history. The social history of labour “from below” is a tradition initiated by E.P Thompson’s The Making of the English Working Class (1963), and extended over several decades by a robust tradition of politically engaged left-wing historical studies of the working classes: a tradition most powerfully entrenched in British historiography (but with many imprints elsewhere, ranging from the United States to Brazil to South Africa to India). The global history of labour, which revised and questioned many of the features of “Thompsonian” history-writing, has sought to overcome “methodological nationalism” in the writing of labour history, to investigate specific labour histories within a global frame, and to enable trans-national histories of workers and work. It has emerged as an increasingly dominant frame of reference for contemporary studies of labour around the world.
This workshop seeks to place these two historiographical traditions in conversation with each other, to examine the stakes of the passage from the older, “Thompsonian” tradition to the “global turn”, and to think about the changed meanings of “doing labour history” today. Participants are urged to explicitly reflect on the methodological and conceptual issues at stake in the practice of labour history.

Between Thompson and the Global: Reflections on Labour History Today We invite papers for a workshop entitled “Between Thompson and the Global: Rethinking Labour History Today”, to be held at the University of Warwick on 26-27 June 2026. This workshop will seek to bring together historians of labour to collectively reflect on a large historiographical shift that has taken place over the last two decades, from the social history of labour (in national contexts) to global and trans-national labour history. The social history of labour “from below” is a tradition initiated by E.P Thompson’s The Making of the English Working Class (1963), and extended over several decades by a robust tradition of politically engaged left-wing historical studies of the working classes: a tradition most powerfully entrenched in British historiography (but with many imprints elsewhere, ranging from the United States to Brazil to South Africa to India). The global history of labour, which revised and questioned many of the features of “Thompsonian” history-writing, has sought to overcome “methodological nationalism” in the writing of labour history, to investigate specific labour histories within a global frame, and to enable trans-national histories of workers and work. It has emerged as an increasingly dominant frame of reference for contemporary studies of labour around the world. This workshop seeks to place these two historiographical traditions in conversation with each other, to examine the stakes of the passage from the older, “Thompsonian” tradition to the “global turn”, and to think about the changed meanings of “doing labour history” today. Participants are urged to explicitly reflect on the methodological and conceptual issues at stake in the practice of labour history.

We would like to invite submissions that address (but are not necessarily limited to) the following themes:
1. To what extent has the global labour history tradition that has flourished over the last 20 years drawn upon or rejected the methodological and conceptual approaches of Thompsonian social/labour history? What other methodologies and concepts have been deployed and proven fruitful?
2. How do we address the burgeoning critique of Thompsonian social/labour history as parochial and Anglocentric (Bressey, 2015; Satia, 2020), and how have historians responded to this challenge and reshaped British labour history accordingly? What can historians of British labour learn from broader global trajectories of workforce formation and labour movements?
3. How might integrating histories of consumption, environment, and reproduction enrich our understanding of labour and its global entanglements?
4.	In what ways can collaboration between historians of Britain and the global south generate new analytical frameworks or unsettle established narratives of class, race, and empire?
5.	What kinds of politically-engaged global social and labour history can best respond to the contemporary challenges of rising global inequality and the appropriation of class politics by some sections of the populist right?
6.	The legitimacy of 'radical' forms of labour-history writing initially arose from politics, from the apparently established centrality of the industrial working class both in society and in projects of social emancipation. That centrality has now been in precipitous decline for a long time. In this context, how might we think about what the ‘politics of doing labour history’ actually implies today?
7. What has been gained and what has been lost in the shift from a labour history dominated by “history from below” to one dominated by global history?
Please send abstracts to globalhistory@warwick.ac.uk

We would like to invite submissions that address (but are not necessarily limited to) the following themes: 1. To what extent has the global labour history tradition that has flourished over the last 20 years drawn upon or rejected the methodological and conceptual approaches of Thompsonian social/labour history? What other methodologies and concepts have been deployed and proven fruitful? 2. How do we address the burgeoning critique of Thompsonian social/labour history as parochial and Anglocentric (Bressey, 2015; Satia, 2020), and how have historians responded to this challenge and reshaped British labour history accordingly? What can historians of British labour learn from broader global trajectories of workforce formation and labour movements? 3. How might integrating histories of consumption, environment, and reproduction enrich our understanding of labour and its global entanglements? 4. In what ways can collaboration between historians of Britain and the global south generate new analytical frameworks or unsettle established narratives of class, race, and empire? 5. What kinds of politically-engaged global social and labour history can best respond to the contemporary challenges of rising global inequality and the appropriation of class politics by some sections of the populist right? 6. The legitimacy of 'radical' forms of labour-history writing initially arose from politics, from the apparently established centrality of the industrial working class both in society and in projects of social emancipation. That centrality has now been in precipitous decline for a long time. In this context, how might we think about what the ‘politics of doing labour history’ actually implies today? 7. What has been gained and what has been lost in the shift from a labour history dominated by “history from below” to one dominated by global history? Please send abstracts to globalhistory@warwick.ac.uk

#CfP Call for Papers

Organised by Global History and Culture Centre, University of Warwick:

Between Thompson and the Global: Reflections on Labour History Today

Workshop: 26-27 June 2026, University of Warwick

Deadline for abstracts: 30 January 2026

Submit to globalhistory@warwick.ac.uk

08.12.2025 10:41 — 👍 30    🔁 30    💬 1    📌 1
Preview
Become a Fellow | Humanities Institute UConn Humanities Fellowships are opportunities for individuals to pursue advanced work in the humanities. Visiting Humanities Scholars, UConn Humanities Scholars, and UConn Graduate Humanities Fellows...

Come spend an academic year with us at UConn as a visiting Humanities Institute fellow! humanities.uconn.edu/fellowships/...

09.12.2025 17:45 — 👍 13    🔁 11    💬 1    📌 2

Ok so obviously you never have to hand it to Franco, but he at least demonstrated the ability to win a civil war before tanking the economy through an interlinked combination of tariffs, corruption and inflation.

09.12.2025 16:23 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
"Peleliu: Guernica of Paradise" Anime Movie | Official Trailer
YouTube video by Sauanime "Peleliu: Guernica of Paradise" Anime Movie | Official Trailer

🫠

This title is like referring to the sinking of the Bismark as 'Germany's Lusitania', a framing that bundles the experiences of perpatrators, combatants and civilians into an artificially flattened category of 'victim of war'.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=dchX...

04.12.2025 08:29 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

At least get their country of allegiance correct ffs

02.12.2025 14:42 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I'm assuming here that we'll have an enforced gap in scholarly research while fighting in the climate wars.

02.12.2025 14:41 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Some old white men in the audience will nod sagely and the chair won't call on the ECR who's had their hand up the entire Q&A and is the only person in the room who worked at the archives of Twitter Remembrance and Reparations Institute.

02.12.2025 14:40 — 👍 14    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

It'll be some backwards logic like "lowering living standards and consumption was the only solution to climate change" and "we need to not take the ritualised public performance of political pantomime as literal"

02.12.2025 14:37 — 👍 16    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

The worst thing about the current historical moment is that in 200 years some smug revisionist historian is going to give a conference paper on how the politics of the 2020s really were entirely rational and a sensible response to material conditions at the time.

02.12.2025 14:31 — 👍 116    🔁 20    💬 5    📌 2

This is utter, abject cowardice.

01.12.2025 08:07 — 👍 7    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Clues by Sam A daily logic puzzle where you deduce who is a criminal!

A niche intellectual achievement but one I'm inordinately pleased with.

I solved the daily Clues by Sam, Nov 30th 2025 (Evil), in less than 14 minutes
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩
cluesbysam.com

30.11.2025 18:43 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
An ad telling people to "schreib dein buch"

An ad telling people to "schreib dein buch"

Potsdam locals putting up hate speech towards visiting historians

28.11.2025 07:27 — 👍 11    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 0
Ancient aliens meme, with "triangles" as the answer to everything

Ancient aliens meme, with "triangles" as the answer to everything

My @sochistorywar.bsky.social conference paper, 2025, colourised

27.11.2025 15:44 — 👍 7    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 1
A temporary, spartan mess hall in a tent, with a very large number of pretzels.

A temporary, spartan mess hall in a tent, with a very large number of pretzels.

A conference catered by the Bundeswehr may not offer luxury, but at least they have some priorities in order

27.11.2025 10:43 — 👍 41    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 0

At least I wasn't arriving!!

26.11.2025 15:06 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Just passing through Wannsee en route to a conference

26.11.2025 15:04 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Cannot believe that I spent a week being angry that my favourite dumpling place in Sydney was closing only to find that it is actually the less good place with an almost identical name a few doors down that's closing.

26.11.2025 11:42 — 👍 7    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
"In her research into everything related to the cosmos, Iris van Herpen shows her talent for synthesis"

"In her research into everything related to the cosmos, Iris van Herpen shows her talent for synthesis"

21st century history PhD: sorry, my specialty is mid-19th century mustaches, you'll need to ask someone else about 1890s beards

19th century German:

22.11.2025 17:34 — 👍 8    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Call For Papers: Nostalgia and Radical Politics, Past and Present | UON Centre for Historical Studies, University of Northampton, UK Monday 15 – Tuesday 16 June 2026 Nostalgia, defined most simply as a wistful or...

CFP: www.northampton.ac.uk/research-blo... Nostalgia and Radical Politics, Past and Present, a 2 day workshop (15-16 June 2026) 🗃️Please share - and submit an abstract!

17.11.2025 13:56 — 👍 24    🔁 23    💬 2    📌 4
Preview
Empire in the Soil: Superphosphate and the British and French Imperial Manufacture, 1914-1937 « History# « Cambridge Core Blog The history of European imperial agriculture has often been told through the lens of technological innovation, such as the development of the agricultural automotive industry or the application of adv...

📣 New Voices continues with a blog from Rosie Charles, @uni-of-warwick.bsky.social.

Rosie's blog explores superphosphate manufacturing by the British and French empires, charting the impact of fertiliser production on imperial expansion and agricultural practices.

www.cambridge.org/core/blog/20...

27.10.2025 15:32 — 👍 6    🔁 6    💬 1    📌 0
Today's NYT connections, where the top row spells Only Connect Olive Branch

Today's NYT connections, where the top row spells Only Connect Olive Branch

Genuine peace offering or court-mandated statement?

27.10.2025 06:56 — 👍 8    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Sounds familiar - researching the 1930s drove this observation as much as anything else. A lot of faceless decisions made that these records didn't matter...

22.10.2025 16:08 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Would that it were the last tool of Nazism that people conviinced the British government to use.

22.10.2025 14:58 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Another interesting question - when do embedded film/photogrpahy units become more about managing contemporary news/journalism, and less about the historical gaze?

22.10.2025 14:51 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Fair points!

22.10.2025 14:43 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Yes, this was foremost in my mind for the "among other reasons" caveat! But I don't think it's the whole picture, especially for non-state institutions.

22.10.2025 14:42 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Drake meme, rejecting studying the history of war because it's cool, embracing studying the history of war because they kept the interesting documents

Drake meme, rejecting studying the history of war because it's cool, embracing studying the history of war because they kept the interesting documents

22.10.2025 14:38 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Probably just rehashing archive theory 101 here, but I wonder whether archival holdings for 1914-18 or 1939-45 are uniquely rich, because (among other reasons) the people selecting documents for preservation at the time were aware of the historic nature of the events at hand.

22.10.2025 14:33 — 👍 4    🔁 1    💬 3    📌 0
Two stills from Father Ted episode where he visits a WW2 memorabilia collector's house.

"You don't have any tattoos from the Allied side?"

"No, that sort of thing wouldn't interest me at all"

Two stills from Father Ted episode where he visits a WW2 memorabilia collector's house. "You don't have any tattoos from the Allied side?" "No, that sort of thing wouldn't interest me at all"

21.10.2025 20:20 — 👍 8    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 0

Bluesky keeps on evolving and thriving! Keep up to date with some of your favorite history people with the AskHistorians Starter Pack! Collecting the friends, flairs and contributors of our great community in one beautiful list!
go.bsky.app/AXQNBFg

18.10.2025 14:12 — 👍 25    🔁 10    💬 1    📌 0

@fraserraeburn is following 20 prominent accounts