Bryan J. Weiner

Losers

Yes, thank you! Please drill this message in meetings with democratic leadership.

Are you high? You VOTED to give them MORE money after they murdered Renee Good. WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU? Coward.

No masks. ID displayed, mandatory. Stripped immunity. Independent investigation.

Yep, gotta go. Primary his ass.

@gluesenkampperez.house.gov you just voted to give more money to the murderers of this brave, good hearted person. Shame on you.

What you voted for:

“Unmarked rental vans all over the city, with people in military gear and no id jumping out of them to take captive anyone who looks nonwhite or who makes political speech they disagree with.”

Coward.

Could you be any more tone deaf. JFC

JONATHAN ROSS-JONATHAN ROSS-JONATHAN ROSS-
JONATHAN ROSS-JONATHAN ROSS-JONATHAN ROSS- JONATHAN ROSS-JONATHAN ROSS-JONATHAN ROSS-JONATHAN ROSS-JONATHAN ROSS-JONATHAN ROSS-JONATHAN ROSS-JONATHAN ROSS-JONATHAN ROSS-JONATHAN ROSS-JONATHAN ROSS-JONATHAN ROSS.

#Justice4ReneeNicoleGood ⚖️

Trump is a loser. Pass it on.

Perhaps someone could project a clown face on the banner. Humor, mocking, laughter. These are powerful weapons against a narcissist reality TV personality

Seems to me the way to shatter the illusion is to have dancing in the streets, celebratory gatherings, picnics, etc. Make the presence of troops look foolish. Subvert the image.

Looking forward to talking today about organizational assessment and readiness. My final lecture!

I realize I have no reach here compared to what I had on Twitter, but shame on those corporate sponsors who pulled out of the SF Pride Parade this year. Fucking cowards.

Dr. Arianna Means @UW talking about #impsci in global health. 👇

#TACO
#TRUMPISWEAK

👇

Dems gotta be the opposition party not the minority party.

PAUSE AND REFLECT: EQUITY CHECK ❯ Does your research question address or involve inequities in health outcomes, access, or quality of care among different populations? ❯ Have you (and how have you) engaged with the communities affected by the inequities to ensure their perspectives and needs are reflected in the research question? ❯ Is answering this question or addressing this inequity a priority of the population(s) involved, or do they have different priorities? ❯ Does your research team include anyone from the community or communities you wish to study? ❯ Have you considered the social, economic, and cultural contexts that may influence variation in implementation and subsequent outcomes of the intervention? ❯ Are there system-level factors, such as policies and organizational practices, that could impact equity in the implementation process? ❯ Has the population you wish to conduct research with experienced historical or contemporary harm that could impact their desire to participate or shape the implementation process and outcomes?

PAUSE AND REFLECT EQUITY CHECK Does the T/M/F: ❯ specify the social, cultural, economic, and political contexts of the research? ❯ account for the needs and contexts of various demographic groups impacted, particularly those who are historically or currently marginalized or underserved? ❯ recognize and aim to dismantle existing power structures that contribute to inequities, including consideration of who has decision-making power and how it can be equitably distributed? ❯ emphasize building trusting relationships with communities and incorporating community-defined evidence so efforts are culturally relevant? ❯ address macro-, meso-, and micro-level influences on equity? ❯ encourage ongoing critical reflection on how well it advances equity and continue to identify areas for improvement?

Hi #impsci friends! Last fall we re-launched our website with a fresh design and new features like the Equity Check for each step on the Research Pathway.

Have you used this feature? Any feedback for us? To explore, begin at Step 1: bit.ly/2VPyJEu. Imgs show Equity Checks for Steps 1 & 2 (of 8):

Hey, @schumer.senate.gov :: you better not be playing cute with your language about stopping the SAVE Act. I hope you intend to VOTE NO ON CLOTURE, as opposed to what you did with the CR when you told us you'd vote no on the bill, but still voted YES on cloture. We are in no mood for games.

That’s it? Step down. You’re a failure as a leader.

But you did just that. That’s exactly what you allowed to happen.

The first rule in fighting tyranny is to never capitulate in advance. You broke that rule. You are not up to the moment as a leader.

Resign. You’re a disgrace.

Schumer is a quisling.

There's more from fed workers in the piece, and I keep hearing from others. Such as:

"Chuck Schumer is a coward who betrayed federal workers after deliberately taunting us for a week with the hope that someone in power gave a single shit about us."

Thank you, Senator. From a grateful constituent.

Republicans’ partisan spending bill turns the federal government into a slush fund for Donald Trump and Elon Musk.

It’s unthinkable that any Senate Democrat would hand them a blank check by voting for cloture.

Yes! Every Democrat should be standing up and shouting this, not caving in out of fear of being blamed for a shutdown. Grow a spine, Dems!