Extrapolate what you will
08.03.2026 00:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@mikemadowitz.bsky.social
Now: Principal Economist @rooseveltinstitute.org & Roosevelt Forward. Then: @equitablegrowth |@JECDems | @amprog | @RFF | @UCSDecon | @BrookingsEcon. This = me+β(no_sleep)+ε https://rooseveltinstitute.org/authors/michael-madowitz/
Disheartening to see anyone taken seriously who says US (or California) oil production protects consumers from Iran war impact. Producers argue world market sets the price. Correct! Oil price reflects value, not proximity, as recent gasoline price jumps show.
www.foxnews.com/video/639043...
My recap of today's jobs report. Don't overreact to the February data...
Instead, you should worry about what spiking oil prices will do to future data.
Link: macromostly.substack.com/p/bls-jobs-r...
Measure zero human!
07.03.2026 21:34 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0What were these ppl thinking when the shale industry was getting hammered last year?
07.03.2026 15:11 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Sat next to him on a red eye and he candy crushed on full brightness the whole flight.
Big retiree energy
I also think it’s a risky habit to hang big overarching labor market narratives on individual jobs reports, they aren’t load bearing
06.03.2026 17:21 — 👍 10 🔁 1 💬 3 📌 0Yeah, construction is, as always, a weird one. Don’t color me shocked if a lot of household replies about working for pay or profit on last minute snow removal never gets reported as formal taxable employment 😉
06.03.2026 18:38 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
I mean, markets are way down on these numbers because they are worse than we guessed based on other data, acting director is career and was acting under multiple admins.
Its still not there
Nope, baseline revision go the opposite of what admin has been pushing
06.03.2026 18:14 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
I’m probably east coast biasing, but my intuition is ref week between storms wouldn’t show up here in hh survey, but slows onboarding reporting on the payrolls side (could even explain some divergence)
I guess best test point for this would be positive feb payroll revisions next month?
The best laid plans....
[Energy secretary]: plans? who said plans?
www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/his...
And even more now that we don’t depend on imports at all because tariffs have breathed new life into US mfg…
06.03.2026 15:59 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
It was me!
Some times payroll data is bad. It was bad this month.
But the idea that an economy with 4.4% unemployment, 80.7% prime age employment, and 2.4% inflation is "destroyed" is very silly.
I have been so good about not using my 'that's one way to win TX senate' jokes!
06.03.2026 15:04 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Just that if you really believed the hype on jobs reversing you're not worried about an oil shock causing a recession, but same jobs market looks like you could knock it over with a feather after today + revisions
06.03.2026 15:02 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
if it wasn't for the war, I'd say that very negative takes on the US labor market based on this report would be a big overreaction
(just like people overreacted with optimism last month)
I don't think the last few month, or the revisions, should radically change your view on a consistently weak labor market.
However, you could convince me that someone who asks if we should really start an oil shock war gets shot down a week ago and prevails today
The latest population control revisions indicate a -1.4mn revision to the US labor force with 1.4mn fewer employed
We're going through a historic negative labor supply shock with net migration falling from over 2mn per year to close to zero while ageing demographics are at play
threw me for a bit too--the California erasure continues
06.03.2026 14:00 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Elise has the bigger story here: these population control revisions are huge.
I expected big ones and I'm still getting my head around them
"Offices of physicians lost 37,000 jobs in February, primarily due to strike activity."
www.bls.gov/news.release...
My spiciest take at this point:
This job market is officially mid--not as fire as last month looked, not as bad as this month's topline looks
Gonna go back to hitting refresh for a bit
Not convinced this jobs report is as scary or as bad as initial reaction.
Household survey looks mostly fine
Little change in participation
Little change in EPOP
U-6 falls again
and again, really bad weather hitting payrolls
Pinning everything on weather rn
06.03.2026 13:31 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Shit, this sucks.
06.03.2026 13:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Weather is our best excuse today!
Watch for SF Fed weather adjusted data later in the day
More in my story today. Oh, and happy #jobsday!
www.nytimes.com/2026/03/06/b...
Brb, building destroyers
06.03.2026 12:37 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0