Nooooo! โฌ๏ธ
09.11.2025 21:41 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@gavinjdaly.bsky.social
Planner, Geographer, PhD Environmental Sciences
Nooooo! โฌ๏ธ
09.11.2025 21:41 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0We should vote only for those who promise to make billionaires history.
We need a great levelling, through tax and redistribution.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
โMore than 5,000 fossil fuel lobbyists were given access to the UN climate summits over the past four years, a period marked by a rise in catastrophic extreme weather, inadequate climate action and record oil and gas expansion, new research reveals.โ
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
This week's column is on Billionaire Brain: the condition which seems to prevent extremely rich people from perceiving the utterly bleeding obvious.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
I've just signed this petition to save Lady's Island Lake, Co. Wexford. Will you sign your name too? my.uplift.ie/petitions/sa... @uplift.ie
07.11.2025 17:58 โ ๐ 36 ๐ 15 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0For those in any doubt, the ongoing nitrates derogation debate is not about the science on water quality, it's political wrangling, with our rivers, lakes and seas caught in the crossfire.
Our waterways deserve better- one can't drink politics.
www.rte.ie/news/politic...
For those who weren't able to attend, you can now view a recording of my talk: "Political Ecological Economics and the nature of economic growth"
www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJw7...
Hope you enjoy!
๐ฃ๏ธ "We are talking ourselves into autocracy here, by taking away peopleโs rights," says Fred Logue, Solicitor Specialising in Planning & Environmental Law, highlighting the value he sees in the judicial review process.
#TonightVMTV
Bill 60 is a vicious, one-sided tenancy legislation. It will cause widespread suffering and loss of life. Anyone who stays neutral is complicit. In this @thestar.com article, I focus on why mayors should fight it.
www.thestar.com/opinion/cont...
So much for "boosting growth".
All this vandalism will do is leave us with devastated ecosystems, fewer green spaces, worse quality of life, while neither solving the housing crisis (because the problem IS NOT AND NEVER WAS "bats and newts") nor creating "growth".
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
I'll be giving a talk on Tue 4 Nov, 15:00โ16:30 CET.
โPolitical Ecological Economics & the nature of growth.โ
It will revolve around why growth persists (surplus extraction, cost-shifting) and how to move beyond it.
Zoom: us02web.zoom.us/j/8854726631...
Link to Article: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
30.10.2025 00:54 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Transport Planning & Post-Growth? Does it work, or not? Which tensions surface, and what are trade-offs to discuss? 'To Transport or Not to Transport: Post-Growth Avenues for Transport Infrastructure Planning' in Journal of Critical Infrastructure Policy ๐ doi.org/10.1002/jci3... #postgrowthplanning
27.10.2025 19:53 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 3 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0The @dublininquirer.com dug a bit deeper into this Progress Ireland in this great piece by Lois Kapila
@samtranum.bsky.social
The President will have no role in environmental policy whatsoever
23.10.2025 15:35 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Remember this, whenever someone says "alternative proteins - yuck!"
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
I have created a starter pack of #degrowth and #post-growth people on Bluesky! Have a look and let me know if I have missed someone :) Really happy that Bluesky is the new place to be ๐๐ฑโ
23.11.2024 10:09 โ ๐ 56 ๐ 23 ๐ฌ 8 ๐ 1No problem. I would say it is precisely the opposite.
18.10.2025 08:20 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Always very convenient when anti-degrowters admit right up front that they don't know what degrowth is.
Degrowth is not about making people poorer. Most wealthy countries have seen plenty of growth over the last few decades, but lives have gotten worse.
You canโt separate aggregate wealth from its distributional and material consequences under capitalism. Iโll ask my librarian to order it and put it in the reading list for my first year ecological economics course. Iโll let you know what they think. Good luck with the book.
14.10.2025 21:06 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0This is not X, so I won't engage in ad hominem. I do respectful debate. I am afraid there is great weight of academic and empirical literature which would disagree with you on that. Anyway, you certainly haven't sold your book to me! I was hoping for something
globalinequality.org/global-incom...
Its neither simple, obvious or non-controversial! The biggest contributer to low availability and accessibility of goods and services globally, and its pathalogcal outcomes, is the capitalist growth economy. The top 10% of the worldโs population owns around 70โ80% of total global wealth.
14.10.2025 15:19 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Very interested in good faith critiques. I have read none so far.
14.10.2025 15:14 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0โEPA said the biggest threats to overall health of the countryโs natural water bodies include animal waste, fertilisers & pesticides running off farmland and forestryโ.
Politically backed ongoing wreckage of our natural environment for profit continues unabated.
www.irishtimes.com/environment/...
That didnโt answer my question! I wrote my own PhD on Degrowth. The purpose of the concept is to try to stop make everyone poorer. If you want a concept that โpromises the moonโ, see ecomodernism. I guess I wonโt be buying the book.
14.10.2025 06:05 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Is this one of those books where the author hasnโt read a word of Degrowth literature but instead engages in preconceived straw men arguments? Reading the blurb, it certainly seems to be that. Degrowth is the opposite of โmaking everyone poorerโ
13.10.2025 16:47 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0