Well, at least the Chinese are happy. www.wral.com/story/how-gr...
17.03.2025 13:44 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
@marcseldin.bsky.social
Serial entrepreneur, technologist, Ed.D, admirer of cats, free thinker.
Well, at least the Chinese are happy. www.wral.com/story/how-gr...
17.03.2025 13:44 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I posted a link previously about how tech billionaires are engaging in a publicly documented effort to create a techno-feudalism. This is the latest step in that effort. gizmodo.com/tech-execs-a...
16.03.2025 23:59 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0"It is also a particularly American disease to confuse wealth with intelligence and corporations with those who own them."
22.02.2025 15:55 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Nothing to see here. Our government is being overhauled by the best and brightest, the very mostest patriotic Americans.
22.02.2025 15:32 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Disgusting reprobates, all of them.
19.02.2025 13:47 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Tate is foul. This is part of a pattern of freeing and rehabilitating the images of some of the world's vilest human beings. If only Jeffrey Epstein were alive today, he'd surely have his moment in the sun.
gizmodo.com/trump-admini...
Part right. Musk is two teenage edgelords in a trenchcoat. slate.com/news-and-pol...
10.02.2025 00:00 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0"I am Dark Gothic MAGA" - Musk
Although a bit long, this is a very well sourced report on how tech billionaires have either co-opted or found common cause with MAGA. The goal: techno-feudalism. There are few real secret conspiracies - this one is out in the open.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=5RpP...
I'm not sure about *more* destructive than Brexit, but at least certainly equivalent. This will be inflationary, destroy jobs, and reduce the real world wealth of millions of Americans. For no purpose that I can understand.
03.02.2025 03:06 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The Welsh told the Saxons this hill was called "pen" (meaning "hill"). The Saxons added their word for hill, "tor," and called it Torpen (hill hill).
Later the Norse added their world for hill. So it became Torpen Haugr (Hill Hill Hill).
Now the English call it Torpenhow Hill (Hill Hill Hill Hill)
That time in the 60s when the US decided to find out whether three random physicists could figure out how to build a bomb. 60 years later, how easy would it be for three random biologists to create a plague? gizmodo.com/the-u-s-gove...
24.01.2025 19:58 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Replete with fake quotes and sources!
23.01.2025 23:48 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Not abstract ranting, dealing with this today.
21.01.2025 23:50 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The narcissist's main super power is an inability (or reduced ability) to feel shame. They are unashamed to be caught in a lie, or when confronted with the emotional damage they wreck upon the people around them. Narcissists are only affected by having their desires thwarted. And they aren't rare.
21.01.2025 23:47 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Meet the new rulers, same as the old rulers. Tech leaders have better seats than cabinet members. Ther are seated in the same section as Trump's family.
20.01.2025 18:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Hear ya, but IMO Twitter was a place for people who thought themselves important to pontificate at other people who thought themselves important. I'm not certain that it ever actually steered convos, may have just reflected the zeitgeist. Now, I'm even less convinced important matters arise there.
14.01.2025 04:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Is it though? Some people still use twitter, to be sure, but I don't think its influence remains strong. Not sure how to objectively measure that however. Re TikTok, other than shutting it down completely I don't see a way to escape its influence. IMO, short form video should be banned outright.
14.01.2025 03:26 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I agree wholeheartedly, but that doesn't alter the fact that Twitter is less influential now than before he bought it. I can only hope that, should he acquire tik tok in his insatiable lust for power, he would similarly corrupt and weaken it.
14.01.2025 01:41 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It is telling. But the good news is that Musk has a solid track record of destroying social media companies, so perhaps this might be for the best.
14.01.2025 01:04 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0What if we normalize eugenics and all that happens is a few diseases become rare? www.nature.com/articles/d41...
13.01.2025 21:11 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I can't tell you how happy I was to see this! Very fun and great memories.
12.01.2025 16:58 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I am sure that generations of residents of Soviet brutalist structures continue to think warmly of your dorm and Iowa!
05.01.2025 05:48 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@marktough.bsky.social I'm sure you've heard plenty about Khrushchev visit to Iowa, but did you know the whole story behind it? It's a fascinating mix of politics, economics, and diplomacy. In the end it was undone by bad science. Pretty interesting! youtu.be/9w7WrXsHkIQ?...
04.01.2025 15:44 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It's systems - not CEOs - people. A whole broken nation of a system.
15.12.2024 23:21 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I would pay money to see this movie
12.12.2024 17:14 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Redbox for software!
09.12.2024 02:51 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It's easier to be angry at an individual than it is to be angry with a system. Systems are nebulous and can't be shot dead on a sidewalk, but they are far more threatening to us.
06.12.2024 14:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It's fine, I guess. I use it. But the hype train is out of control. Both fears and prophecies are a bit hyperbolic, at least in the short to medium term.
06.12.2024 04:49 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Don't believe the underlying technology has much relevance to an inconsistent user experience, it's just a handwavey explanation for poor testing. Especially since React is everywhere these days and distributed and even serveless apps are the new norm. Tldr, it's interesting so far but not in love.
06.12.2024 04:47 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Weird, well now it is working that way for me too. User error on my part? I'm just happy to see the GUI working!
06.12.2024 01:29 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0