Having snowball fights in Dupont Circle. Literally.
27.01.2026 18:38 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Having snowball fights in Dupont Circle. Literally.
27.01.2026 18:38 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
There's a certain category of commentator who wants to advocate for ignoring climate change who thinks "but what about the eventual heat death of the universe" is some kind of argumentative trump card and it's embarrassing every time.
This is next level, though.
Passed a group of four Guardsmen having a literal snowball fight. Their deployment in DC was always absurd and unjustified but come on, folks.
27.01.2026 17:36 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0In 2025, more than 10,000 STEM PhDs quit or were fired from federal jobs. That's 14% of the federal STEM PhD workforce, and 17% of STEM PhDs at 14 critical agencies. A huge loss of expertise and institutional memory, representing more than 106,000 person-years of experience.
27.01.2026 12:49 β π 13 π 5 π¬ 0 π 1Back in DC for the week just in time for the most snow we've had in a decade. Since the National Guard is still here loitering around metro stations looking bored, seems to me the least they could do is get some shovels in hand and help dig out.
26.01.2026 16:54 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0
Great story by @mariagallucci.bsky.social on how Trump forcing all Department of Interior reviews of clean energy projects to get personal approval from DOI Secretary Doug Burgum has stifled 22GW of development in the midst of an energy crisis:
www.canarymedia.com/articles/cle...
#energysky
Going to be hard to provide real assurances while the administration is trying to illegally cancel hundreds of obligated contracts, literally rob a bank to claw back disbursed funds from the financial agent for the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, and is defending those attempts in multiple courts.
08.01.2026 01:19 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0National security concerns raised by the Pentagon during the leasing and planning of offshore wind projects south of New England were also fully mitigated, because thatβs part of what the much maligned NEPA process does: Balances legitimate competing uses for Americaβs public lands and waters.
22.12.2025 18:03 β π 3 π 4 π¬ 0 π 010. In other words, in 2012 new production benefited domestic producers AND consumers. But today, new production only benefits producers. That's a fundamentally different policy and political environment. And note also that domestic consumption is basically flat for the last 20 yrs.
20.12.2025 15:35 β π 1316 π 114 π¬ 6 π 5
This is incredible (good news too): βAfter a 40% fall in 2024 in battery equipment costs, itβs clear weβre on track for another major fall in 2025β¦The economics for batteries are unrecognizable, & the industry is only just getting to grips with this new paradigmβ
www.pv-magazine.com/2025/12/12/b...
In March, I was on an "Abundance" panel where I said that if Congressional Republicans repealed IRA credits for building clean energy at a time of skyrocketing demand, they were going to own the blame for rising energy bills. I think some people thought I was engaging in motivated reasoning. Welp!
11.12.2025 15:56 β π 111 π 21 π¬ 2 π 1We wonβt have all the data for awhile yet but Iβm predicting the 30C Alternative Fuel Refueling Credit is going to do way more to expand EV charging nationwide than any other program. (And could have done even more if not for arbitrary geographic restrictions imposed by Congress.)
21.11.2025 02:27 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0TODAY: Tune in at 5:30 p.m. CT to hear @slashklc.bsky.social, Susty Vibes's @dzennypha.bsky.social, Creo's Kobi Weinberg, and mHUB's Elizabeth Andrews discuss global lessons in urban climate resilience and Chicago's potential as a climate refuge. πΊβ€΅οΈ brnw.ch/21wXgh1
06.11.2025 15:58 β π 0 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Itβs almost as though these competitively awarded grants in a highly oversubscribed program were selected on the basis of merit and need, not politics or ideology. But that was in the olden times of (checks watch) less than a year ago.
15.10.2025 00:00 β π 6 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0
Programmatic review provides a faster permitting process, so this change will result in unnecessary delays for bringing new generation online.
In the Biden admin, responsibly expanding programmatic reviews was among many unsung reforms that brought federal permit times down by ~25% from 2022-2024.
Another day, another packet of evidence that the energy policy of this administration is a world-historic self-own that will leave the U.S. poorer and less competitive in a rapidly changing global economy.
03.10.2025 17:57 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Two more examples for you: Hillary did a 3-day Appalachia tour during the primary, meeting with voters on energy, jobs, health care, substance abuse. Biden had a massive effort to help fossil communities attract investment. Idea that either wrote off large swathes of βredβ America is so frustrating.
28.09.2025 21:42 β π 63 π 7 π¬ 2 π 1Senate environment Dems have held several such hearings, starting around March of this year IIRC, including on the illegal efforts to freeze competitively awarded, contracted federal funds.
18.09.2025 18:00 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
πβ‘ EVs win everywhere
A new study shows that in every US county, electric vehicles now emit less greenhouse gas than petrol cars, no matter how you drive them.
π pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/...
#SciComm #EVs #ClimateAction π§ͺ
Their antipathy appears limited to the technologies that pose a near-term threat to an unnecessary gas expansion. Existing hydro has mostly already been uprated. SMR, conventional nuke, new hydro, marine kinetic energy sources will all take years to develop. Wind, solar, storage β not so much.
25.08.2025 23:13 β π 75 π 14 π¬ 2 π 2Solar executives warn that Trump attack on renewables will lead to power crunch that spikes electricity prices β via @cnbc.com www.cnbc.com/2025/08/24/s...
24.08.2025 17:05 β π 111 π 54 π¬ 7 π 9Wow: βIf you grow an acre of corn, it will produce 900 gallons of ethanol, which will get you about 25,000 miles for a Ford F-150...which is, not bad I guess. But letβs say we put solar on that same acre. It will produce enough electricity every year to drive my Lightning 550,000 miles.β
12.07.2024 21:42 β π 585 π 210 π¬ 14 π 18Highlighting synchronous compensators is good; unfortunately Bloomberg is again repeating the fallacy that the precipitating event of the Spain blackout was solar failing. Thermal generators went down first, and then Spainβs grid regs (which can also be revised!) took solar offline as a precaution.
21.08.2025 13:11 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Link to the guidance for those who want to start their weekend with wonkery: aboutblaw.com/bjeL /π§΅
15.08.2025 20:24 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0In short, we've once again got further headwinds for clean energy developers, with smaller and tax-exempt players hurt the most, at a time when electricity prices are rising nationwide and we should be deploying all the solar, wind, and storage we can get. 7/
15.08.2025 20:24 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The differentiation between 'commence construction' for wind and solar vs other 48E/45Y technologies (plus 45Q, 45V, and 48D) continues to seem on shaky legal ground to me. Not an APA lawyer, but I'd think there are some pretty clear grounds to argue these changes are arbitrary and capricious. 6/
15.08.2025 20:24 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0And small private developers don't have the market power to out-compete the big guys to take full advantage of physical work safe harbor. If I'm right, we'll see less deployment, less diversification of clean energy resources, and (as always with this administration) higher costs. 5/
15.08.2025 20:24 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I'm particularly concerned about what these changes will do to rural co-ops, Tribes, and smaller developers. Co-ops and other entities were going to blend tax credits with grants. If they get tangled in permitting chaos, they may not be able to begin physical work. Tribes may struggle even more. 4/
15.08.2025 20:24 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The guidance eliminates the cost safe harbor (previously 5%) altogether for everything except very small ( < 1.5 MW) solar projects. This is going to create chaos for segments of the market that cannot easily meet the physical work test, raise costs even for those who can, and reduce deployment. 3/
15.08.2025 20:24 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0It clearly undermines Congressional intent and goes against the text of the GOP bill. The law as actually passed provided a (shorter than optimal) transition period using the longstanding commence construction standard. These changes go against that, and arbitrarily shorten the transition. 2/
15.08.2025 20:24 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0