Did Ronald Reagan ‘love tariffs’ as Trump claims? on.ft.com/47kWzvy
26.10.2025 17:40 — 👍 54 🔁 15 💬 25 📌 6@gperessotti.bsky.social
PhD student in Public Policy and Political Economy at UT Dallas | Interested in International Political Economy ~ International Trade |
Did Ronald Reagan ‘love tariffs’ as Trump claims? on.ft.com/47kWzvy
26.10.2025 17:40 — 👍 54 🔁 15 💬 25 📌 6BREAKING: "USTR Initiates Section 301 Investigation of China’s Implementation of Phase One Agreement"
👉 ustr.gov/about/policy...
ME: Here are the FACTS about China's purchases of US exports relative to the commitments set out under the US-China Phase One Agreement
👉 www.piie.com/blogs/realti...
www.reuters.com/world/china/...
Symptom of recent trade trends for sure
Trump/Putin summit called off www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
21.10.2025 17:04 — 👍 24 🔁 14 💬 7 📌 2Vs. another example (of many) of trade power being wielded in a not-standard (is it?) manner.
20.10.2025 14:31 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The power of trade measures actually (and finally, despite being uncertain still) wielded but the EU too.
20.10.2025 14:24 — 👍 5 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0"Digital provision inclusion in trade agreements: the death of (digital) distance through a gravity model approach" by @gperessotti.bsky.social was recently published in EJIR!
You can find the full article here: t1p.de/r3m4x
The formal review process for the USMCA has started ahead of next year's renegotiation.
Check out everything you need to know about the future of the USMCA, from critical minerals to dairy to lumber to, of course, tariffs, & more:
https://www.piie.com/microsites/2025/future-usmca
(2) Existing national laws and domestic preferences appear to be related to whether agreements focus on specific provisions such as e-commerce facilitation or data privacy protection
20.09.2025 19:16 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0What I find:
(1) Unlike with trade-in-goods, distance does not appear to be a big constraint in how "intensively" countries decide to implement digital provisions in their PTAs
Super excited to about my first solo-author paper at the European Journal of International Relations (EJIR)!
You can find "Digital provision inclusion in trade agreements: the death of (digital) distance through a gravity model approach" here: journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
I feel compelled to point out -- no laughing please! -- that Congress could put a stop to this tariff nonsense.
02.04.2025 22:19 — 👍 193 🔁 31 💬 8 📌 3Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman joins to discuss historical lessons plus new thinking on international trade, worry over geographically concentrated production, industrial policy, AI, the Draghi Report, as well as tariffs under President Trump.
🎧 Listen 🎧: tradetalkspodcast.com/podcast/206-...
Tariffs are a double-whammy squeeze on farmers . . . their costs (equipment, fertilizer) go up and they are the first target of foreign retaliation . . .
www.wsj.com/opinion/trum...
What in the ever-loving fuck…
21.03.2025 00:48 — 👍 119 🔁 26 💬 5 📌 0podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/t...
Richard Baldwin being as eloquent as ever
“What’s the future of global trade?”
This episode of #TheEconomicsShow with @draliceevans.bsky.social and @jburnmurdoch.ft.com is SO. GOOD.
www.ft.com/content/5b2c...
POV: You're 16, believe being in advanced placement math class means you're a once in a generation genius, and have just discovered Reddit.
23.02.2025 11:07 — 👍 11560 🔁 1028 💬 318 📌 96Donald Trump considers tariffs to counter digital services taxes on Big Tech
https://www.ft.com/content/558b5a20-c25e-483d-8fdc-bbfd2923afd1
Talks between the US and the EU could lead to the EU lowering its 10% tariff on cars.
So the US would also scrap the 25% tariff on trucks right?
...right?
www.ft.com/content/4228...
Some weekend trade policy reading: Trump administration is going after what it considers to be discriminatory foreign taxes and regulations, including digital services taxes.
21.02.2025 23:59 — 👍 5 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 7Revise and resubmit.
19.02.2025 19:52 — 👍 99 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0A negotiation about the fate of Ukrainian territory, envisaged as safeguarded by security garauntees from Europe, but featuring neither Ukraine nor Europe.
I can understand why he's less than enthusiastic.
It’s been a long week in #EUtrade, here is what happened👇
The 🇪🇺& 🇲🇽 hope to sign a modernised trade pact this summer, the commission set definitive anti-dumping duties on 🇨🇳 biodiesel imports and much more...
By Rob Francis and Iana Dreyer
borderlex.net/2025/02/14/w...
Our practical guide to shift-share IV is now out in the JEP!
www.aeaweb.org/issues/793
(Ungated version: www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/el9yn...)
tfw
u signed up for bluesky a year ago
went into government
got off social media
forgot about bluesky
got out of government
tried to sign up again
but bluesky won't let u
"that username is already taken"
(oops. by me)
u finally log in
and there is an AMAZING community already here
so hi bluesky!!!
podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/t...
We are so back! With Trade Talks and @chadbown.bsky.social
A post from Donald Trump in Truth Social. It says “The Tariffs, and Tariffs alone, created this vast wealth for our Country. Then we switched over to Income Tax. We were never so wealthy as during this period. Tariffs will pay off our debt and, MAKE AMERICA WEALTHY AGAIN!”
I am going to become The Joker
01.01.2025 22:15 — 👍 3120 🔁 328 💬 253 📌 277Make America Groggy Again
26.01.2025 23:42 — 👍 34 🔁 6 💬 1 📌 0