𝓂𝓈. 𝓅𝒶𝓉𝒽

holy based for washington

my cat's reaction to me vacuuming

what's the concept? i'm imagining it to be something that does make sense

we are the daughters of the idiot-savants you couldn't autism-snipe

i've wandered off and become lost

could happen to anyone

a marriage is between one consenting adult autistic person and another consenting adult autistic person

paige bueckers wants a mini goldendoodle

lol

i started digging a hole to China when i was 12 and i’m almost there

i mean there's like no real info in this article

i don't think this happened

cloud is playing!

limperty

make no mistake: it is over

lol

tomorrow i will be playing mystery booster 2 draft inside an nfl stadium

there are two separate crews of transgender crustpunks in this midwestern hotel lobby. yep, there's a board game convention in town

i'm in indianapolis reading the wikipedia page for indianapolis

the greater intestine and the lesser intestine. the common intestine and the dire intestine.

i can discern the true nature of all things using only my eyes and my mind

dry shaving my legs in the back of an uber

Screenshot of text: [Highlighting begins] But the shooting may put concerns over gun violence back on voters’ minds, and may lead some to further scrutinize Mr. Mamdani, [Highlighting ends] who has relatively limited experience in government and has not handled a high-profile crisis while in office.

One fascinating thing about the most self-serious newspaper in America with its staff of the winning journalistic meritocrats is that it routinely, institutionally publishes completely made-up bullshit speculation about pure abstractions, based on zero reporting, written as if it were plain facts

Plaintiffs first contend that some or all of the Individual Plaintiffs have standing based on current injuries. They point to three types of injuries: constraints on their ability to parent, censored speech, and restrictions on access to information about their children. The State responds that these injuries are not cognizable under Article III. Construing the allegations in the FAC in favor of Plaintiffs, Pennell v. City of San Jose, 485 U.S. 1, 7 (1988), we agree with the State that Plaintiffs’ alleged injuries are not cognizable. a. Constraints on Parenting Plaintiffs first argue that the Statutes have injured the Individual Plaintiffs by forcing them to alter their parenting styles. This injury is most pertinent to Parents 1A and 1B. Fearing that their child, 1C, may run away to seek genderaffirming care, 1A and 1B are “hesitant to discipline 1C” because they do not wish to give 1C any reason to leave home. This tension further leaves 1A “uncomfortable every time she has a disagreement with 1C.” Plaintiffs argue that these types of parenting-related difficulties are practical injuries that the Individual Plaintiffs have suffered due to the Statutes.

I missed this important one on Friday.

9th Cir. holds anti-trans organizations and parents lack standing to challenge Washington laws providing mental health care and shelter to trans minors who run away.

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/op...

here's a story of something funny that happened a couple years ago
flinta.forum/2025/07/29/a...

why would a court withdraw an opinion and moot a pending petition for rehearing instead of simply granting the petition? wanted to withdraw its opinion on different grounds than the petition perhaps?

i like their product. i want them to have a little walking around money.

i get this youtube ad a lot that starts out with "as a litigation paralegal, it can be difficult finding process servers in other states" and i'm always like "no its not, i use abclegal". the ad is for abclegal. this post is not an ad for abclegal, but it could be.

(giving new coworker a tour of the office) the guy at this desk sucks. don't bother even introducing yourself to him. don't say hi to him

i'll keep working on it