Korobochka πŸ’Ž mirror's Avatar

Korobochka πŸ’Ž mirror

@cirnosad.bsky.social

Mirroring cirnosad's best posts/threads. Follow him: https://x.com/cirnosad Reposted with permission. [Account run by @kiritonervegear.bsky.social]

185 Followers  |  0 Following  |  2,614 Posts  |  Joined: 31.08.2024  |  1.9109

Latest posts by cirnosad.bsky.social on Bluesky

[UTC 5:15 PM Β· Sep 30, 2025]
x.com/cirnosad/sta...

30.09.2025 17:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The only solution is a violent one that necessitates the erasure of such a people from the planet. There's actually no solution short of that, anything else is mental masturbation.

30.09.2025 17:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

… war and genocide followed by mixing down with known cattle casts from the Indian subcontinent and sub-Saharan Africa.

Just like farmers that need to breed docile species, and separate the female from males, they rely on the very same farming strategies in order to isolate and destroy us.

30.09.2025 17:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

… and turn human beings into a open system that they can farm forever by closing it in through themselves/their machines.

The problem for them is white people and east Asians. Their interim solution is…

30.09.2025 17:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

For one particular macro-parasite (macro because they're not inside of us, at least not their biological components -- unless you've taken a vaccine ;)), they call human beings "cattle" because their dream is to overcome this limitation imposed on them by their creator…

30.09.2025 17:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Their teleology is to suck the life out of closed systems, opening them up then wiping out their own source of sustenance.

They're not living beings as such, but mimics of them. They're deformed beings that do not contain all the parts required to sustain themselves.

30.09.2025 17:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Our enemies are not other humans.

They're parasites, or "void warriors". Why do I call them void warriors? They're a kind of biological suicide weapon, just like a one way drone.

30.09.2025 17:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

[UTC 4:47 PM Β· Sep 29, 2025]
x.com/cirnosad/sta...

29.09.2025 19:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This didn't come from equipment. It came from our previous world, which was destroyed.

Speaking of that... the coal itself, where did it come from?
Do you really want to know? :(

29.09.2025 19:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

A Donbass story defying the geological narrative.

Deep in the J3 'Sukhodolsky' coal mine at a depth of almost a kilometer, is an artifact from a different cycle.

A literal wheel buried in the sandstone ceiling of the mine.

29.09.2025 19:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

[UTC 3:36 PM Β· Sep 28, 2025]
x.com/cirnosad/sta...

29.09.2025 19:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

So that tells us they didn't just kill him on a whim, they groomed him knowing he would betray them one day. They provoked him into showing his hands via Shillman and Ackman. Then they executed him in front of all of us.

29.09.2025 19:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Now this might seem silly but then look at the "enough is enough" meme they slipped in. Look at the Snake Eyes date reference (though it's a good chance that was just a clairvoyant vision of the future).

It was also a day before 9/11. That date had a lot of premonition in media as well.

29.09.2025 19:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

They killed Charlie on the 6th year and 66 day anniversary of his podcast.
Which just happened to be the 10th year anniversary of Ben Shapiro's show anniversary.
Ben Shapiro was set to launch "Friendly Fire" (FF) on this day.
A=1,...,E=5,F=6
FF = 66.

29.09.2025 19:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Here's why I believe this. This is just my own private thoughts and not a fully baked idea, so feel free to skip this tweet and ignore it. It doesn't have as high confidence as my usual posts on this subject.

29.09.2025 19:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

[UTC 6:41 AM Β· Sep 28, 2025]
x.com/cirnosad/sta...

29.09.2025 12:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I don't think so, at least not for our generations. But perhaps our role in this world is to serve as a warning for the future. A grim reality we will all have to contend with through little fault of our own.

We inherited the broken world the boomers and gen-X losers put together for us.

29.09.2025 12:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Meanwhile, the workplace does the opposite, pitting us against each other while HR policies create unnatural human boundaries.

Is there a way back to the way things used to be?

29.09.2025 12:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Smartphones killed that off. Clubs kept going until dating apps killed those off. Now there's nothing.

We all look back at university and feel a sense of nostalgia because the course work forced so many of us into close proximity.

29.09.2025 12:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

…as well as the rise in the need to be entertained through electronic means (starting with television) has completely killed our socialization.

From the 90s onwards, the soft patch was to force everyone on drugs and alcohol so that the boredom most people felt around others didn't act as a barrier.

29.09.2025 12:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It happens within a social group and you get to know each other THROUGH that group. This is both true on the wire and in the physical realm. Our collapsed society and the boomer's war on the third places…

29.09.2025 12:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

You might be fooled by the media into thinking relationships form by isolating someone, taking them to a restaurant or some secluded place and then "getting to know each other" in a formal style interview.

No.

29.09.2025 12:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

[UTC 1:57 PM Β· Sep 27, 2025]
x.com/cirnosad/sta...

28.09.2025 01:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

They'll just stick near you and look at you, usually in pairs or 3s. Trust those who show, not tell.

/End

28.09.2025 01:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

... Actually, you know what? Forget this entire list. The real red flag is any spoken word at all: If they really like you and aren't corrupt, they will hardly say anything to you at all outside of situational talk.

28.09.2025 01:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Any generalised disrespect toward men: She's broken beyond repair and has a poor relationship with her father.

Any talk about former boyfriend: do a 360 and moonwalk away.

28.09.2025 01:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

"Energy"/"Vibration": Used in the context of relationships. Usually means she's tried a lot of people and has no innocence.

"Found myself": i.e. she found out that she's a wh*re.

"Settle down": Yeah, after having sex with every other man on the planet, walk away and laugh.

28.09.2025 01:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

"Partner": Another failure of sexual dimorphism. A partnership implies two separate components that can be broken. A marriage is the opposite of a partnership -- it cannot be broken and is composed of a single part. Women use this because they're feminists and don't want to say "husband" or "wife".

28.09.2025 01:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

"Consent": Code from the homosexual revolution which has destroyed relationships. Decouples sex from marriage. Eventually integrated INTO marriage, and now marital rape is a thing.

28.09.2025 01:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

"Creepy": Code for social shaming, attempting to control men. In reality, human beings will be attracted to whatever. We have controls to make things healthy, but over the last 100 years things went out of control.

28.09.2025 01:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0