Ben Diskin's Avatar

Ben Diskin

@bendiskin.bsky.social

Living embodiment of the ðŸĪŠ emoji. (Also a voice actor sometimes.) (He/Him) Conventions: Sam (https://cesd-conventions.com/) NoAI

9,638 Followers  |  231 Following  |  1,324 Posts  |  Joined: 16.06.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Ben Diskin (@bendiskin.bsky.social)

😭 how cud u

03.03.2026 03:20 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💎 0    📌 0
02.03.2026 20:46 — 👍 555    🔁 223    💎 1    📌 0
Post image

One of the greatest, Bruce Campbell, announcing he has cancer. Our hearts are with you Bruce, Hail to the King.

03.03.2026 00:49 — 👍 5904    🔁 1906    💎 99    📌 517

People who were dogpiling her without knowing her or her stance on AI were out of line.

My opinion is that that anger should be saved for the giant corpos, not individuals we might disagree with.

02.03.2026 22:32 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💎 0    📌 0

I agree, but it's also different when the "pro AI" sentiment is coming from a person vs a giant multibillion dollar corporation.

I think normal people deserve some grace.

Even if this woman were SUPER pro-AI, she doesn't have the power to strengthen this technology's grasp.

02.03.2026 22:32 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💎 1    📌 0

If giant corporations aren't shoving AI in our faces, they're probably investigating its use behind the scenes as a cost-saving (see: replacing people) measure.

It's extremely tiring and frustrating and it makes us all a little batty.

02.03.2026 22:21 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💎 1    📌 0
Preview
Sheryl Lee Ralph: AI threatens creativity in filmmaking Movie star Sheryl Lee Ralph has revealed that she fears the potential impact of AI technology.

That's somewhat fair. I think comparing this to ICE reformation V abolition is hyperbolic.

She HAS expressed interest in having her likeness scanned after her death in the past. I don't know if that reflects her CURRENT stance as that was from a 3-year-old article and people can change their minds.

02.03.2026 22:19 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💎 1    📌 0

No. I'm asking you to question whether or not you understand what's happening. I'm saying your eyes and ears might not be perceiving all of the information. And that without that information, you're forming an uninformed opinion.

None of this is an attack on your character as a human being.

02.03.2026 20:25 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💎 0    📌 1

Somebody being "content" about this is an assumption about somebody that you don't know.

Who knows. Maybe you're right!

Maybe there really IS somebody on union staff who doesn't like her.

My point is that it's not fair to make that assumption and doing so isn't some sort of an act of goodness.

02.03.2026 20:10 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💎 0    📌 1

I don't know. I don't know who makes those decisions either. And that's why I'm not accusing them of something malicious. Because I don't know them. I don't know what the process is by which these decisions are made.

My point is, I'm willing to acknowledge my lack of knowledge.

Can you?

02.03.2026 20:01 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💎 0    📌 1

Okay. Name them.

Name the union staff member who did this. Show me that you really know who they are and can attest to what kind of person they are and what their motivation was.

You can't.

You are attributing malice to a person when they might have just done something dumb.

Hanlon's Razor.

02.03.2026 19:59 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💎 0    📌 1

Agreed.

02.03.2026 19:39 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💎 0    📌 0

And then they posted it without thinking about how it might be perceived.

Was it a mistake?

Oh, yes. Absolutely.

Was it malicious?

I'd bet good money on, "NO."

02.03.2026 19:32 — 👍 33    🔁 3    💎 0    📌 1

This was probably some over-worked, underpaid member of union staff, who thought, "Oh, look. A prominent member of the union talking about the work being done on AI. Great. Let's slap a subtitle overlay on this and post it. We've got a million other things to take care of today."

02.03.2026 19:32 — 👍 27    🔁 2    💎 1    📌 0

Like.... guys.... you wanna know what this LIKELY was? Not an evil, malicious actor's union that hates *checks notes* actors.

A calculated effort to harm a former elected leader who's been volunteering her time and effort behind the scenes?

I doubt it.

02.03.2026 19:32 — 👍 22    🔁 0    💎 1    📌 0

So NOW, it's things like this (paraphrased to protect identities):

SAG-AFTRA wanted to make it look like she endorses AI!

SAG AFTRA hates and openly disrespects its own members.

I'm mad. That was intentional, taking her words out of context like that.

02.03.2026 19:32 — 👍 23    🔁 0    💎 1    📌 0

As it turned out, a different video surfaced, from the same event, in which she spoke openly about her negative experience having her voice cloned by AI and expressed the importance of guardrails around the technology.

She is clearly NOT pro-AI.
bsky.app/profile/hbja...

02.03.2026 19:32 — 👍 21    🔁 6    💎 2    📌 0
Quote post from someone regarding a video. It reads, "Two things shall forever remain true: SAG-AFTRA organizers doing the hardest work in the industry, and SAG-AFTRA higher-ups ruining every single bit of it by saying the stupidest shit imaginable on camera."

Quote post from someone regarding a video. It reads, "Two things shall forever remain true: SAG-AFTRA organizers doing the hardest work in the industry, and SAG-AFTRA higher-ups ruining every single bit of it by saying the stupidest shit imaginable on camera."

I saw replies and quote posts like this one. (I've cropped out the user's name because they later learned they were mistaken and deleted this post. Please do not harass them.)

02.03.2026 19:32 — 👍 16    🔁 0    💎 1    📌 0

For context, SAG-AFTRA shared this video of Sheryl Lee Ralph, a former vice-president of the LA branch of the union.

People erroneously jumped to the conclusion that she was pushing a pro-AI agenda.

bsky.app/profile/saga...

02.03.2026 19:32 — 👍 92    🔁 22    💎 2    📌 0

Oh, make no mistake, there are definitely malicious people out there. For sure.

02.03.2026 18:57 — 👍 11    🔁 0    💎 0    📌 0

Most of the worst and cruelest decisions made by leaders in the world don't come from malice; they come from an unflappable belief in themselves that whatever they're doing is the right thing and fully justifiable.

02.03.2026 17:31 — 👍 4    🔁 0    💎 0    📌 0

When it comes to politics, you have to vote for somebody to participate in our system. Nobody's ever going to really know the politicians they vote for on a personal level, so we can only judge them by their actions or lack thereof.

02.03.2026 17:31 — 👍 5    🔁 0    💎 1    📌 0

You want to know what you should do? You should probably ask yourself, "Hey... do I actually know this person? Like 'KNOW them' know them?" And if the answer is "no," don't leap to the conclusion that they're an evil person hiding behind false stupidity.

02.03.2026 17:20 — 👍 7    🔁 2    💎 1    📌 0

People need to learn about Hanlon's Razor:

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

What it means is, "Don't assume someone's evil. They're likely just being dumb or ignorant or just making a simple mistake."

People are rarely as cruel as we assume them to be.

02.03.2026 17:15 — 👍 182    🔁 50    💎 9    📌 2
Post image

Some old Aggretsuko Fanart~

28.02.2026 13:54 — 👍 56    🔁 16    💎 0    📌 0
Post image

i don't think i ever posted this here??
BUT YEAH
SISTERS!

#helluvaboss #loona #octavia

27.02.2026 16:58 — 👍 862    🔁 296    💎 19    📌 1

We cannot and should not let generative AI take away these tiny, insignificant, but probably fun as hell jobs from artists

27.02.2026 06:11 — 👍 11886    🔁 3257    💎 58    📌 43

People who have to exaggerate someone's mistakes to justify their mistreatment of them don't actually care about justice or victims.

They're motivated by their own desires and mask them as righteousness.

Disgusting behavior.

25.02.2026 03:18 — 👍 48    🔁 6    💎 2    📌 0

I only know this song from Game Grumps lmao

24.02.2026 16:11 — 👍 10    🔁 1    💎 1    📌 0
Preview
a yellow smiley face with a cracked face and a cloud coming out of it ALT: a yellow smiley face with a cracked face and a cloud coming out of it

The prooooopheeeeeccccccccyyyyy!!!!

24.02.2026 04:02 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💎 0    📌 0