Daniel Wisneski's Avatar

Daniel Wisneski

@danwisneski.bsky.social

Associate professor of psychology at Saint Peter's University. Studying moral and political psych. Living in Jersey City. https://danwisneski.wordpress.com/

426 Followers  |  871 Following  |  10 Posts  |  Joined: 27.09.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Daniel Wisneski (@danwisneski.bsky.social)

Video thumbnail

This woman speaks for the majority of Americans. πŸ™ŒπŸ™πŸ«ΆπŸ‘‡

25.01.2026 16:33 β€” πŸ‘ 3933    πŸ” 1438    πŸ’¬ 107    πŸ“Œ 124

Historian here it’s not just the Supreme Court, it’s time for a Third Reconstruction of American democracy now that we have seen how easy it is for bad actors to play the system for nefarious goals.

19.12.2025 13:25 β€” πŸ‘ 624    πŸ” 155    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 9

I'm glad I thought to check the alt text :)

06.11.2025 15:28 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Screen shot of the original post but with the label "quiet posters" highlighted.

Screen shot of the original post but with the label "quiet posters" highlighted.

Seems like bluesky has an opinion.

17.09.2025 17:56 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or
even imposed on users β€” in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in
the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or
apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we
are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not
considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This
is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse
and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece,
we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology
industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to
relevant work to further inform our colleagues.

Abstract: Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or even imposed on users β€” in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in the 21st with social media. For these collective blunders, we now regret our involvement or apathy as scientists, and society struggles to put the genie back in the bottle. Currently, we are similarly entangled with artificial intelligence (AI) technology. For example, software updates are rolled out seamlessly and non-consensually, Microsoft Office is bundled with chatbots, and we, our students, and our employers have had no say, as it is not considered a valid position to reject AI technologies in our teaching and research. This is why in June 2025, we co-authored an Open Letter calling on our employers to reverse and rethink their stance on uncritically adopting AI technologies. In this position piece, we expound on why universities must take their role seriously toa) counter the technology industry’s marketing, hype, and harm; and to b) safeguard higher education, critical thinking, expertise, academic freedom, and scientific integrity. We include pointers to relevant work to further inform our colleagues.

Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI
(black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are
in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are
both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and
Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf.
Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al.
2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA).

Figure 1. A cartoon set theoretic view on various terms (see Table 1) used when discussing the superset AI (black outline, hatched background): LLMs are in orange; ANNs are in magenta; generative models are in blue; and finally, chatbots are in green. Where these intersect, the colours reflect that, e.g. generative adversarial network (GAN) and Boltzmann machine (BM) models are in the purple subset because they are both generative and ANNs. In the case of proprietary closed source models, e.g. OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Apple’s Siri, we cannot verify their implementation and so academics can only make educated guesses (cf. Dingemanse 2025). Undefined terms used above: BERT (Devlin et al. 2019); AlexNet (Krizhevsky et al. 2017); A.L.I.C.E. (Wallace 2009); ELIZA (Weizenbaum 1966); Jabberwacky (Twist 2003); linear discriminant analysis (LDA); quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA).

Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms
are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe.

Table 1. Below some of the typical terminological disarray is untangled. Importantly, none of these terms are orthogonal nor do they exclusively pick out the types of products we may wish to critique or proscribe.

Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles

Protecting the Ecosystem of Human Knowledge: Five Principles

Finally! 🀩 Our position piece: Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia:
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...

We unpick the tech industry’s marketing, hype, & harm; and we argue for safeguarding higher education, critical
thinking, expertise, academic freedom, & scientific integrity.
1/n

06.09.2025 08:13 β€” πŸ‘ 3787    πŸ” 1896    πŸ’¬ 110    πŸ“Œ 390
Thousands of people and placards are seen in front of the state capitol. This photo is a credit to Minneapolis photojournalist that goes by the handle Daviss on X

Thousands of people and placards are seen in front of the state capitol. This photo is a credit to Minneapolis photojournalist that goes by the handle Daviss on X

Thousands of people and placards are seen in front of the state capitol. This photo is a credit to Minneapolis photojournalist that goes by the handle Daviss on X

Thousands of people and placards are seen in front of the state capitol. This photo is a credit to Minneapolis photojournalist that goes by the handle Daviss on X

A woman protestor holds up a sign that reads β€œIn honor of our beloved Melissa”

A woman protestor holds up a sign that reads β€œIn honor of our beloved Melissa”

NEW: In the last few hours, Minnesota authorities warned people against attending protests, with a killer on the loose.

This is the current view of the Minnesota State Capitol in St. Paul.

DEFIANCE. πŸ‘

#NoKings #50501Movement

(πŸ“Έ Daviss)

14.06.2025 19:12 β€” πŸ‘ 4197    πŸ” 1109    πŸ’¬ 77    πŸ“Œ 76
Preview
Live: Speaking on Trump, Musk, and America’s Moral Moment on the Senate Floor | Senator Cory Booker YouTube video by Senator Cory Booker

I’ve taken the Senate floor and will speak for as long as I’m physically able to lift the voices of Americans who are being harmed and not being heard in this moment of crisis. Watch here:

31.03.2025 23:00 β€” πŸ‘ 51061    πŸ” 10509    πŸ’¬ 10828    πŸ“Œ 3205
Post image

He's not a "kid." He's an adult, with an important govt job.

The posts weren't "stupid." They were hatefully racist.

His life isn't "ruined." He lost a job.

Holding a govt employee accountable is not a "reward" for a journalist. The reporter doesn't get a cookie.

07.02.2025 18:25 β€” πŸ‘ 7546    πŸ” 1499    πŸ’¬ 394    πŸ“Œ 104

Same editor or different?

07.10.2024 18:50 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I saw yesterday that a new Godspeed album is scheduled to be released on Oct 4. Pretty excited for that

13.09.2024 17:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Sad news. My old apartment was near there and above an Italian bakery. When the weather was nice, we could open all the windows and it would smell like a mix of chocolate and cannoli shells.

29.03.2024 16:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Absolutely. Both groups may, for example, show equal amounts of "intolerance" towards groups with which they disagree, but that ignores normative qs about which groups are/aren't worthy of being the targets of intolerance.

06.03.2024 23:56 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm only part of the way through the paper, but looks like they find some evidence of symmetry across party ID, but that polarization is a stronger predictor of support for violence among Rs.

06.03.2024 21:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

We do have a bunch of trust and legitimacy measures in both waves of the 2020 election data (including for SCOTUS). Not much in the way of predictors, unfortunately (eg abortion attitudes)

15.12.2023 23:38 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Damn. I was hoping someone had put in a grant for that sort of data. Sucks that they didn't see what an important opportunity that was.

15.12.2023 23:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Forthcoming AJPS: "Dobbs produced a sizable dent in institutional support, perhaps an unprecedented dent, in part because abortion attitudes for many are infused with moral content and in part owing to the Court’s substantial tilt to the right since 2020" papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

15.12.2023 16:50 β€” πŸ‘ 44    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 2

LAST CALL! We are raising money to honor @lindaskitka.bsky.social on the SPSP heritage wall. She has had a career and impact worth celebrating. We’re close to the SPSP fundraising threshold. Help us tip over the edge today!

my.spsp.org/About/Donate...

#socialpsyc #psychscisky

04.12.2023 18:46 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1
Society for Personality and Social Psychology > About > Donate > Heritage Initiative Society for Personality and Social Psychology

Let's celebrate @lindaskitka.bsky.social!

We are raising money to recognize the amazing career & contributions of Linda Skitka, and to honor her as part of SPSP'sΒ Heritage Wall. You can makeΒ make a donation to the Heritage Initiative here: my.spsp.org/About/Donate...

#socialpsyc #PsychSciSky

20.10.2023 19:13 β€” πŸ‘ 24    πŸ” 15    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 2
Post image Post image Post image Post image

Analia Albuja just won SPSPs Emerging Scholar award!

In recent work, she finds that Black people empathize least with Black/White Biracial people who White identify who have faced discrimination

www.analiaalbuja.com/_files/ugd/4...

19.10.2023 19:27 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

I remember that. It was in Tampa during the pirate festival. Iirc, Bargh wore a pirate hat at one point and you could hear canons going off during the session. It was my second spsp and definitely made an impression.

01.10.2023 13:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
BlueSky Science-Related Feeds Sheet1 Likes,Name (Click to visit feed),Tags,Contact to ask to be added to contributor list 11,<a href="https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ftnzzw4cnon2pzpw7i5m2xu7/feed/aaaiqnkwsgsz6">#AI&HCI</a>,#HCI,...

🚨 Science Resources for BlueSky 🚨

Scientist? Just joined BlueSky? Here’s four resources you might find useful.

#AcademicSky πŸ§ͺ 🧡

(1) A list of over 130 subject-specific feeds. Find posts by others in your area and use the right tags in your posts to get them seen.

28.09.2023 07:18 β€” πŸ‘ 289    πŸ” 176    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 24