's Avatar

@uncivil-s.bsky.social

Barrister, ex-public sector, semi-demi-retired, various legal part time jobs. Legal interests public law, housing and some property, crime, statutes, and most other things. Lives Birmingham, works in a 150/mile 270 degree crescent therefrom. Has sons.

769 Followers  |  837 Following  |  1,467 Posts  |  Joined: 15.11.2024  |  2.0723

Latest posts by uncivil-s.bsky.social on Bluesky

Badenoch bad mouthing English degrees - I know they are niche nowadays, but not that long ago they were one of the largest schools, and turned out lots and lots of (potential) Tory voters. Now older, now Tory vote core …

08.10.2025 10:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

As a recent immigrant to Birmingham, I find it the most relaxed, easy going and (for most part) effectively integrated city (or town, for that matter) that I’ve ever lived or worked in.

08.10.2025 06:56 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Great piece by @stephenkb.bsky.social

08.10.2025 06:42 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Quite so!

07.10.2025 13:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Worth noting that the political neutrality convention wasn’t actually that old, either - appointments before WW2 could be pretty partisan, apparently.

07.10.2025 13:05 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I have an ideological aversion to β€œthings ain’t what they used to beβ€œ, but it is struggling against the raw fact that defeated oppositions (and indeed new governments) were measurably smarter than what we have at the moment.

07.10.2025 11:40 β€” πŸ‘ 82    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 0

β€œANY” community? So he’d feel uncomfortable walking around a village in Shropshire if he saw no black or brown faces? Little shit.

07.10.2025 09:37 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This would be a quite astonishing, I think unprecedented, attack on the judiciary if he were to do it. I hope there would be a very strong response, both politically and from the judicial leadership.

07.10.2025 09:33 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I live in Birmingham and I’d complain if I saw Jenrick’s face anywhere in the city.

06.10.2025 20:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah, but who’d win, Texas v California? Presumably Arizona and New Mexico would be the battleground.

06.10.2025 20:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Did I just hear that Labour’s attack line against the (ludicrous)Tory claims that they’d make enormous savings by cutting benefits was that it was implausible because the Torys weren’t good enough at cutting benefits?

06.10.2025 08:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hope it turns out the best that it can. Horrible for you.

06.10.2025 06:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

*gasp*

05.10.2025 21:03 β€” πŸ‘ 3116    πŸ” 1060    πŸ’¬ 188    πŸ“Œ 139
Stephen Miller
Follow
@StephenM
Legal insurrection. The President is the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces, not an Oregon judge. Portland and Oregon law enforcement, at the direction of local leaders, have refused to aid ICE officers facing relentless terrorist assault and threats to life. (There are more local law enforcement officers in Oregon than there are guns and badges in the FBI nationwide).
This is an organized terrorist attack on the federal government and its officers, and the deployment of troops is an absolute necessity to defend our personnel, our laws, our government, public order and the Republic itself.
β€Ί Joyce Alene
@JoyceWhiteVance β€’ 3h
1/ Judge Immergut just granted a restraining order that prevents Trump's mobilization of the Oregon National Guard in Portland.
IMMERGUT, District Judge.
This case involves the intersection of three of the most fundamental principles in our
constitutional democracy. The first concerns the relationship between the federal government
and the states. The second concerns the relationship between the United States armed forces and
domestic law enforcement. The third concerns the proper role of the judicial branch in ensuring
that the executive branch complies with the laws and limitations imposed by the legislative
branch. Whether we choose to follow what the Constitution mandates with respect to these three
relationships goes to the heart of what it means to live under the rule of law in the United States.

Stephen Miller Follow @StephenM Legal insurrection. The President is the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces, not an Oregon judge. Portland and Oregon law enforcement, at the direction of local leaders, have refused to aid ICE officers facing relentless terrorist assault and threats to life. (There are more local law enforcement officers in Oregon than there are guns and badges in the FBI nationwide). This is an organized terrorist attack on the federal government and its officers, and the deployment of troops is an absolute necessity to defend our personnel, our laws, our government, public order and the Republic itself. β€Ί Joyce Alene @JoyceWhiteVance β€’ 3h 1/ Judge Immergut just granted a restraining order that prevents Trump's mobilization of the Oregon National Guard in Portland. IMMERGUT, District Judge. This case involves the intersection of three of the most fundamental principles in our constitutional democracy. The first concerns the relationship between the federal government and the states. The second concerns the relationship between the United States armed forces and domestic law enforcement. The third concerns the proper role of the judicial branch in ensuring that the executive branch complies with the laws and limitations imposed by the legislative branch. Whether we choose to follow what the Constitution mandates with respect to these three relationships goes to the heart of what it means to live under the rule of law in the United States.

Stephen miller is actively calling for a civil war right now on Twitter.

I really do not think Americans are taking in the reality that the federal government is openly admitting to waging war against democratically held cities and states and what comes now that this is being openly said.

05.10.2025 03:50 β€” πŸ‘ 921    πŸ” 312    πŸ’¬ 45    πŸ“Œ 25

They also make a satisfying click on the pavement when you walk with one, furled.

04.10.2025 17:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This is true of little folding umbrellas. Proper umbrellas work perfectly well.

04.10.2025 17:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Nearly. He says nearly 250. So not quite.

04.10.2025 17:29 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I can’t help thinking that it’s unlikely that the American army had parachuting airborne troops in 1917/18.

04.10.2025 14:29 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I’m old enough to remember the SDP/Liberal Alliance polling over 50%, but getting twenty-something seats at the next election. It may be a bit of a comfort.

04.10.2025 13:38 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

3 October 2013, Dr. Pietro Bartolo (photo) is checking a long line of body bags laid out on the quayside on the island of Lampedusa. For 21 years he's been the frontline doctor on this tiny outcrop of Europe, where almost half a million migrants have landed [Thread] >> 1

03.10.2024 11:49 β€” πŸ‘ 53    πŸ” 26    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 3

Does this apply to, say, parachute jumps?

02.10.2025 20:43 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Might it not be the case that the strong reaction against the ill-tempered nature of the referendum is receding over time? I suspect it is.

01.10.2025 19:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Why would it β€œsplit”? People may have different reasons for a conclusion, but ultimately don’t care too much what motivates their allies.

01.10.2025 19:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Not me, for a start. But the point in contention is your assertion that there is no point in a political party that doesn’t represent the people they were set up to represent 125 years ago. (Who, also, it didn’t represent then, btw).

01.10.2025 16:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Labour should die of embarrassment because it’s more popular with a big group of voters than it is with a small group of voters?

01.10.2025 16:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

But the working class is small, the middle class big.

01.10.2025 16:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

(And at the last GE, Labour had about the same % of the vote of every social class).

01.10.2025 16:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I’m not sure a political party should be β€œembarrassed” by gaining votes from a large section of the voting population while losing some from a small section.

01.10.2025 16:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Ethnicity isnt anything to do with DNA, except to people who use it as a stand-in for β€œrace”.

01.10.2025 15:42 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

But why do you say - if you do - that non-white people who identify as English are not part of the English ethnic group? Ethnicity is a social invention, not something biologically marked.

01.10.2025 15:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@uncivil-s is following 19 prominent accounts