Michael Jacobs

YouTube video by Prime Video Latinoamérica Mi Muñeca Me Habló ft. Julieta Venegas I 31 Minutos: Calurosa Navidad

Mi Muñeca Me Habló ft. Julieta Venegas I 31 Minutos: Calurosa Navidad

With every passing day, America needs a bigger third reconstruction.

I hope someone figures it out before my next flight.

The gangster regulatory state in action.

This is what competitive authoritarianism looks like - regime ally trying to purchase media and remove critical voices

I would have also added a Power Management Settings submenu in Settings.

Every Trump SCOTUS nominee: I respect stare decisis.

a cartoon of a coyote with the words super genius on the bottom ALT: a cartoon of a coyote with the words super genius on the bottom

Super genius laying a trap here.

Me: Cat? No, probably person.

🍿🍿🍿

Look, this isn’t checkers, it’s four dimensional Price is Right.

*subjected, not diverted. WTF autocorrect???

Indeed. And even more if it weren’t just Democrats who were subjected to shame and consequences. (Though don’t get me wrong, I’m totally fine with Democrats being diverted to both and then some.)

According to the court they’re “new features” that have improved the products. I’m guessing this judge isn’t a heavy user of social platforms.

She never even mentions the bolt cutters. WTH??? She had one job, asking Bernice for bolt cutters, and she doesn’t come through!

Going off repeatedly about George Soros is quite a choice.

And on p. 10. This is quite the dissent.

States Must Appeal Judge Mehta’s Feckless Remedies Decision in Google Search Case, Advocates Urge - States Must Appeal Judge Mehta’s Feckless Remedies Decision in Google Search Case, Advocates Urge Following Judge Amit Mehta's decision in September on remedies in U.S. v. Google search, in which he declined to terminate the tech giant's monopoly despite finding last year that Google illegally mai...

We teamed up with a range of public interest groups to urge state AGs to appeal the incredibly weak, insufficient remedies to address Google's monopoly over search.

www.economicliberties.us/press-releas...

Yesterday, Trump defended the Saudi Crown Prince in the Oval Office.

He said he had “nothing” to do with the murder of Jamal Khashoggi.

But I reviewed a call while serving on Trump’s NSC that I believe would be of interest to the Khashoggi family and the American people.

Release the transcript.

I don’t know why but it really grates on me when people use “compute” as a noun.

👇👇👇

No, just within the federal judicial district where the court is located (around Chicago).

I think his theory makes even more sense when you remember that digital advertising on the open web (which Google is endangering here) isn’t Google’s cash cow; search advertising is. So it makes sense to sacrifice that to keep users on Google’s properties, like search, and monetize them there.

Thumbnail of page 1 of the PDF linked above.

Thumbnail of page 2 of the PDF linked above.

Thumbnail of page 3 of the PDF linked above.

Thumbnail of page 4 of the PDF linked above.

New filing: "FTC v. Meta"
Doc #693: Memorandum & Opinion

Download PDF | View Full Case

#CL18735353

Oof.

Trump has not adequately alleged the falsity of CNN’s statements. Therefore, he has failed to state a defamation claim. Trump’s other arguments are likewise meritless. He argues that the district court erred in limiting its analysis to the five defamatory statements that he listed in his complaint. According to Trump, the district court should have also analyzed the “more than sixty instances of defamation set forth in the Notice Letter to CNN” and the “nearly 7,700 instances in which CNN had defamed Plaintiff with the ‘Big Lie’ allegation.” Brief of Appellant at 18. Trump has not alleged that any of these “instances of defamation” refer to something other than CNN’s use of “Big Lie.” We have held that, by using “Big Lie” to describe Trump, CNN was not publishing a false statement of fact. Therefore, whether CNN used “Big Lie” one time or many is irrelevant to the question of falsity.

11th Cir., in an unpublished order, holds that Trump's defamation lawsuit against CNN for its coverage of his election lies is meritless.

media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/unp...

The fact that no one in the room stood up for her says a lot about how we got here bsky.app/profile/pale...

“Quiet, Piggy” getting more pickup.

@cnn.com @peoplemag.bsky.social @dailymirrornews.bsky.social

Donald Trump Snaps at Female Reporter Who Asks About Epstein Files: 'Quiet Piggy' Donald Trump Says 'Quiet Piggy' to Female Reporter Asking About Epstein Files

…and then the rest of the White House press corps pushed back against the president’s gratuitous insult aimed at one of their colleagues?

Oh wait! There’s no sign that anything like that happened!

Because access beats out solidarity, every day of the week.

people.com/donald-trump...

In April 2009, the Washington Post asked 10 writers to make the case for something that deserves to be tossed out as part of "spring cleaning."

I chose Larry Summers.

Better late than never.

Unlocked version of my 16-year-old article below.
naomiklein.org/why-we-shoul...