When I hear the term โan army of agentsโ
01.11.2025 21:29 โ ๐ 23 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@nmn.bsky.social
When I hear the term โan army of agentsโ
01.11.2025 21:29 โ ๐ 23 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0On the flip side.
- No need for dependency arrays.
- No need to memoize most of the time.
- No need to break up components for suspense.
- No need to have a fancy library or effects for data fetching.
And solid is pretty easy at a basic level:
1. State is getter function (signal)
2. Youโre not allowed to read the state in your components. Only create new getter functions that can read the state.
3. Use <When> and <For> components instead of ternaries and .map
Learn Solid.js people. Svelte and Solid are essentially the same with different syntax and IMO JSX > Svelte syntax.
30.10.2025 20:22 โ ๐ 6 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Or I should say the other libraries that popped up when React first became popular. Like Mithril and Cycle.js.
But somehow Remix is the worst attempt at a React-like VDOM component framework Iโve seen so far.
I wonโt go that far. I remind me of old react with more awkward syntax.
30.10.2025 20:17 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0It would be good to have a way to do conditional imports synchronously.
And bundlers that can handle that kind of thing and serve different permutations of files based on information available during the request.
Apple is getting some well deserved criticism for this.
But aside from that, can we stop using top level await entirely? It makes things so so annoying.
She should do it anyway. And Bernie can maybe be the VP!
30.10.2025 02:29 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Exactly. Unless someone like John Steward runs itโs not looking good.
Thatโs ignoring the fact that there might not even be another real election to begin with.
Who should run that can actually win?
30.10.2025 02:09 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Moving off React is fine. Not everything needs to be React.
But what theyโve built instead of React is significantly worse than React IMO.
Polanski might have a better strategy.
My observation was purely what i felt watching the videos each of them put out on their own.
I hope yโall get someone good that actually delivers next election.
Just donโt* like how.
24.10.2025 23:32 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I wonโt pretend to know enough about UK politics to comment.
I just found it fascinating that you prefer the comms, specifically of Polanski and thatโs the one thing i dont like. I like the content of what heโs saying. I just like *how*.
Just interesting.
As an outsider Corbyn came off more genuine. These videos feel performative IMO.
24.10.2025 21:14 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0And finally, do you think this is a bloated pile or crap? Cuz I think it feels snappy and easy to use:
next-faster.vercel.app
Also, I thought you were genuinely asking. Devs use the thing they feel will help them build something quickly. They only worry about the quality of the experience after the fact. Iโm not saying thatโs good or bad. Itโs just how these decision are made at profit seeking companies.
24.10.2025 08:26 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Iโm not talking about React specifically here. The point is that the solution to Reactโs problems is either making React itself better or alternatives like Solid.js or Qwik.js
Going back to just the browser standards doesnโt necessarily result in better experiences.
Here's the code for my Async React demo:
github.com/rickhanlonii...
Depends how the outer framework is rendering it, but yeah I get it.
Iโd rather make a framework-specific wrapper to fix those issues than deal with all the shadow dom weirdness.
๐ฏ
24.10.2025 03:17 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Honestly I think with modern web features the need to pull in components built in a different framework should be rare. With dialogs, popovers etc a lot of the things we built manually is available out of the box now.
Get a good styling system and youโre done. (Obvious StyleX plug)
I said that sentence to mean custom elements are โessentialโ. Having a common interface is obviously good and i think custom elements are the best part of the โweb componentโ spec although i have many issue with it too.
24.10.2025 03:07 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Yup. I think using a custom element is fine as an abstraction for the cross-framework boundary. I donโt think shadow dom is needed in most cases though.
โHTML-web componentsโ would work just fine.
Then weโre basically on the same page!
24.10.2025 03:02 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0React used to show state-less components before hooks. Remix only show prop-less components.
24.10.2025 03:00 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Anyway, this is becoming unexpectedly and unintentionally argumentative.
I just think we over-use custom elements and shadow dom because โweb componentsโ.
And render scoping is weird to me because as long as youโre in the same framework, you *want* that child to be re-rendered. And if youโre at a framework boundary, you donโt need a custom element to stop rendering. There are all kinds of ways to do that for each framework.
24.10.2025 02:54 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0The distribution situation is pretty bad because you still need custom JS and logic for rendering *within* the shadow DOM so itโs just unnecessary overhead.
And if you donโt care about that, using a custom element at only the boundaries makes sense.