After several years of work, my lab is starting to put out our first papers on learning in a unicellular organism (Stentor coeruleus).
Here we show evidence for a form of associative learning in Stentor:
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
After several years of work, my lab is starting to put out our first papers on learning in a unicellular organism (Stentor coeruleus).
Here we show evidence for a form of associative learning in Stentor:
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
We've posted a new fMRI study of semantic relations (has-part, is-a, made-of, etc.), a key aspect of language. We find that relations are represented in the same brain regions as are other semantic concepts, though voxels tend to be selective for only one relation or another.
doi.org/10.64898/202...
The "publish or perish" culture must perish. Scientists need time to think.
We just published our Slow Science Manifesto, where we argue that huge changes are needed in the way we fund, publish, and evaluate science.
Read more and sign here: www.slow-science.com
1/7 Can infants recognise the world around them? 👶🧠 As part of the FOUNDCOG project, we scanned 134 awake infants using fMRI. Published today in Nature Neuroscience, our research reveals 2-month-old infants already possess complex visual representations in VVC that align with DNNs.
02.02.2026 16:00 — 👍 155 🔁 70 💬 4 📌 8
🚨NEW PREPRINT🚨
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
w/ Giulio Degano and Uta Noppeney
In this work, we use music to investigate how the brain extracts and integrates multisensory information in real-world environments.
🧠🧪 #psychscisky #neuroskyence
TL;DR 🧵👇
More broadly, our work reveals how the brain automatically extracts statistical correlations across the senses to track complex streams of information in our natural world.
19.01.2026 10:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Our findings highlight the important, yet largely unexplored influence of touch on auditory processing, offering a significant leap in our understanding of how the "feeling" of music enriches our auditory world.
19.01.2026 10:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0These encoding benefits were associated with superadditive interactions in primary auditory cortex, where tactile signals sharpen and amplify auditory envelope representations. In complex polyphonic music, touch further amplified the segregation and encoding of temporally coherent auditory streams.
19.01.2026 10:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Vibrotactile signals improved the detection of a brief target embedded in music, establishing the functional relevance of audiotactile integration in naturalistic settings.
19.01.2026 10:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Using psychophysics, fMRI and time-resolved EEG decoding, we addressed how the brain encodes the temporal structure of music (beat and envelope) across audition and touch and uses this information to guide multisensory integration and segregation in simple and more complex perceptual scenes.
19.01.2026 10:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0We often experience music not only through our ears, but also as vibrations resonating through our bodies, whether at concerts, festivals or even just via our mobile devices. How do these vibrotactile signals influence music processing? How do they aid auditory scene analysis?
19.01.2026 10:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
🚨NEW PREPRINT🚨
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...
w/ Giulio Degano and Uta Noppeney
In this work, we use music to investigate how the brain extracts and integrates multisensory information in real-world environments.
🧠🧪 #psychscisky #neuroskyence
TL;DR 🧵👇
Paper out today in @nathumbehav.nature.com:
1) those groups (women, African Americans, lower SES, rural) that are underrepresented in science have been less trusting of science.
2) If you improve representation in science, you improve trust among those groups.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
We’re happy to share that the website for the 24th International Multisensory Research Forum, which will take place in Genoa, Italy, from 24 to 27 June 2026, is now live:
imrf2026.sciencesconf.org
Save and share the key dates, and stay tuned for more updates. #IMRF2026
Well this is exciting!
The Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences at Johns Hopkins University (@jhu.edu) invites applications for a full-time tenured or tenure-track faculty member in Cognitive Psychology, in any area and at any rank!
Application + more info: apply.interfolio.com/178146
High-level visual surprise is rapidly integrated during perceptual inference!
🚨 New paper 🚨 out now in @cp-iscience.bsky.social with @paulapena.bsky.social and @mruz.bsky.social
www.cell.com/iscience/ful...
Summary 🧵 below 👇
GPT style cartoon of a debate between a smiling Skinner and a angry Chomsky, while in the back, a robot is reading "verbal behavior"
I’m happy to share a short opinion piece I’ve just finished, where I revisit the famous Skinner vs. Chomsky exchange on how language is learned through the lens of today’s large language models (before getting mad read the rest) 1/n
osf.io/preprints/ps...
This is a great resource for setting (or improving) a lab culture rooted in awareness, fairness, and equity:
📌 Publication: elifesciences.org/articles/108...
📌 Website: safelabs.info
Asking informally: does anyone know someone who might be interested in a postdoc focused on understanding changes in memory representations driven by attention using EEG? ⚡️Thanks!
01.12.2025 05:03 — 👍 17 🔁 26 💬 1 📌 0Two posts from Bluesky. The first one shows a figure from a paper published in Nature Scientific Reports full of totally incoherent AI fabricated gibberish words. The other a comment on a recently published paper by eLife discussing the paper and its peer reviews which were published along with the paper.
Nature Sci Rep publishes incoherent AI slop. eLife publishes a paper which the reviewers didn't agree with, making all the comments and responses public with thoughtful commentary. One of these journals got delisted by Web of Science for quality concerns from not doing peer review. Guess which one?
27.11.2025 13:35 — 👍 156 🔁 69 💬 4 📌 8
CogSci in Aarhus is hiring, open rank (assi, asso or full prof).
We want somebody working on and teaching computational modelling of cognitive processes and/or social processes. Students are amazing, work/life balance very satisfactory, and colleagues are nice!
international.au.dk/about/profil...
The title page
🚨NEW PUBLICATION ALERT!🚨
The 'Design Features' of Language Revisited (w/ @mperlman.bsky.social @glupyan.bsky.social Koen de Reus & @limorraviv.bsky.social)
Feature Review out now in #OpenAccess in @cp-trendscognsci.bsky.social! #language #linguistics
Paper: doi.org/10.1016/j.ti...
By mapping connections among researchers, Neurotree makes it possible to trace how the field has evolved and to visualize how shifts in lab size, training and other factors can shape its direction, writes founder @stephenvdavid.bsky.social.
bit.ly/4od0SiL
#neuroskyence #StateOfNeuroscience
Online Now: Hierarchical interactions between sensory cortices defy predictive coding
20.10.2025 19:04 — 👍 52 🔁 26 💬 2 📌 3A worker sorts through a large pile of e-waste in an industrial facility, highlighting the environmental impact of discarded electronics.
We're seeing lots of headlines about the catastrophic impact of massive data center expansion. But what else could data centers look like?
In my perpetual quest to seek out alternative technofutures, I want to highlight the really cool work of Keolu Fox.
🧵
Dr Daniël Lakens presents 'When & How to Deviate From a Preregistration.' Essential for research integrity. Register:
www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/when-and-h...
#Preregistration #OpenScience #DataScience #Statistics #AcademicResearch @lakens.bsky.social
I’m looking for a postdoc to join my lab and work on Multi-Brain Stimulation (MBS).
Learn more about the project and how to apply below 👇
This position is funded by the @erc.europa.eu
Reposts are very welcome 🙏
#Postdoc #Neuroscience #BrainStimulation #EEG #SocialNeuroscience
Yes! This is very relevant osf.io/preprints/ps...
15.10.2025 09:33 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Public engagement: building common ground How can we help to bridge this divide? Simply producing more excep tional science will not be enough to rebuild public trust. Rather, we must adopt a new model that recognizes communication and advocacy as core pillars of science, on a par with rigor and reproducibility. Public engagement efforts should be valued for faculty promotions, much like obtaining grants and publishing our findings in scientific journals. Researchers should be recognized and rewarded for activities such as giving public talks, working with local schools, engaging with policy makers, developing social media campaigns and platforms or writing accessible articles for general audiences. Developing these skills must be an integral part of scientific training, reinforcing the notion that the responsibility to champion science lies with us. Courses that teach graduate students and postdocs to communicate complex ideas clearly, to use social media effectively and to advocate for evidencebased policies must be deemed critical and supported by our universities. These efforts should not be viewed as distractions from research but woven into the fabric of what we do as scientists. Rebuilding public trust requires a cultural paradigm shift: scientists must see themselves not just as producers of knowledge, but also as its ambassadors and translators. Such a fundamental change will occur only if it is embraced by our scientific leaders and institutions, emphasizing the critical role of public engagement for science to succeed.
A thought-provoking piece in Nature Neuroscience by many neuroscience colleagues: "Science must break its silence to rebuild public trust". Lots to think about here.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
If this happened at a steel plant there would be talk of government bail out to secure jobs
13.10.2025 09:50 — 👍 226 🔁 72 💬 4 📌 2