Of course. Itโs much easier to have a project plan to dismantle or destroy things. A true blueprint for what we want may be far more complicated to spell out in a way folks can easily absorb.
28.02.2025 15:52 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@ashleepow.bsky.social
Of course. Itโs much easier to have a project plan to dismantle or destroy things. A true blueprint for what we want may be far more complicated to spell out in a way folks can easily absorb.
28.02.2025 15:52 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 012/04/2024. 42 minutes of exposure time with POOR polar alignment and less processing experience. Only used dark and light frames. No Bias or Flat calibration frames.
12/15/2025. 4 minutes of exposure time with GOOD polar alignment and a bit more processing experience. Also, used Dark, Bias, and Flat calibration frames.
Clearly, post processing and good polar alignment are critical. 42 minute exposure time (left) vs only 4 minutes of exposure time (right) with better polar alignment and bit more experience with post processing. Seems improved to me. Also, added bias and flat calibration frames in the second one.
17.01.2025 02:05 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0It says the invite link is invalid or expired.
15.01.2025 22:54 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Read your post on FB. And, for the record, youโre the one that kickstarted me to create this BlueSky account.
Iโm pretty done with FB too.
Happy to join you here. :-)