People think that they're not strong because they're so slender, but they can easily pull folks over like this because they're basically all muscle!
04.03.2026 08:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0People think that they're not strong because they're so slender, but they can easily pull folks over like this because they're basically all muscle!
04.03.2026 08:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Oh yes.......cats, squirrels, rabbits.......if they see them they'll go, so you learn to hold on tight!
04.03.2026 07:38 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Thank you for making such a long trip!
03.03.2026 18:46 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Thank you, but I don't know about a marvellous job! Just about holding it all together is the truth!
03.03.2026 18:45 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0💚
03.03.2026 07:31 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Olive, Judy, William and Forrest 😊
02.03.2026 23:46 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0There's actually 4 greyhound in there! One is hiding behind Han!
02.03.2026 23:29 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Welcome 👋🏻💚
01.03.2026 10:10 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0BOOM!
01.03.2026 00:55 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I agree that the right vote is now more split than it's ever been, and the political spectrum is split up more evenly nowadays
28.02.2026 20:44 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Fair comment. Certainly Farage's public profile being raised by various media organisations has enabled his views to be accepted more broadly. My main concern is they seem to have topped out at 30%ish, but if normalised further could create a broader coalition.
28.02.2026 20:44 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Agreed. It is somewhat involved because it feels radical. Not easy to put on a simple-to-understand leaflet. Needs the party's best communicators to talk about it with the cut-through messages. But the party has great communicators and will find a way for this excellent policy to get broad support.
28.02.2026 13:42 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Hannah? I can confidently say she wouldn't.
28.02.2026 13:00 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0There can be no environmental justice without social, racial and economic justice. Addressing one problem almost always means that you're also chipping away at another.
28.02.2026 12:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Absolutely. Different things resonate with different people, and the localism aspect is easier when it's a by-election. But I do agree with the message that started with Zack but has become somewhat broader Green Party messaging.
28.02.2026 12:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0And the important thing is that you recognise it! So thank you for that. Get too much of the "woke nonsense" or "political correctness police" when I point this stuff out. So appreciate your acknowledgement here 😊
28.02.2026 12:50 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It's a concern though. Farage and Reform get normalised by stealth if there's a much more radical right in the picture.
28.02.2026 12:49 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0😢
28.02.2026 12:18 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0*tradesperson 😉
28.02.2026 12:17 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I understand what you're saying but disagree. Zack often talks about the environment being very far down people's priorities when you can't afford the basics of life. G&D is one of the most deprived constituencies in the country. Talking about the environment would have been out of touch.
28.02.2026 12:16 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0💯
27.02.2026 23:03 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0If it wasn't Labour, they'd have been saying something about it immediately. But they didn't. Silence speaks volumes in this instance.
27.02.2026 23:01 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0If it wasn't Labour, they'd have been saying something about it immediately. But they didn't. Silence speaks volumes in this instance.
27.02.2026 23:01 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@zackpolanski.bsky.social : "Once again Reform are spreading misinformation & smears, and the press & the media seem to repeat them.. its really important that the media.. take responsibility so when Reform or Farage says something they don't just keep repeating it"👏👏👏
27.02.2026 09:19 — 👍 3305 🔁 1058 💬 212 📌 225Pretty rare for them to lose half their vote and get pushed out into third though.
27.02.2026 11:17 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0And a focus on Labour losing the by-election, rather than the Greens winning it.
27.02.2026 11:13 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Thanks so much for coming up Peter. Sorry that we didn't bump into each other!
26.02.2026 16:17 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0If you say so pal. Rob Ford said what he did. The tactical voting website didn't. That's really quite different. But we're not getting anywhere here, and I'm sure we both have better things to do with our day. Have the last word if you like, but I'm off to do something constructive.
26.02.2026 12:49 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0How about we pretend both of us are adults in possession of all the facts and then tell me why you're trying to convince the world that there's equivalence here.
26.02.2026 12:39 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Why don't you read Rob Ford's Substack and make your own mind up?
26.02.2026 12:23 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0