Professa Murray's Avatar

Professa Murray

@kalimurray.bsky.social

I am a law professor. The Only Patent Habermasian. Dedicated to bringing a knife to a knife fight.

4,477 Followers  |  2,335 Following  |  3,313 Posts  |  Joined: 16.11.2023  |  2.336

Latest posts by kalimurray.bsky.social on Bluesky

Anyone who β€œsettles” with the President should demand that any money be placed in a Treasury account.

21.11.2025 16:38 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

What we have right now is appropriations trench warfare. If I was a college β€œpaying” any settlement agreement, I would write Congress to demand the settlement be placed into β€œTreasury”. Taking control of the β€œpipes” still remains DOGE’s primary achievement.

21.11.2025 15:00 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

You maximize power; it costs you legitimacy.

21.11.2025 14:40 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The reason why the Trump Administration is losing itself over this ad is it raises the exact issue that I have been discussing today: we cannot determine anymore if their assessment of what is lawful is legitimate because no-one can credit what they say as lawful or truthful.

21.11.2025 14:39 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It was super-bad faith; Paxton colluded with the federal government to take it a supine district court judges. It was a shameful abdication of the electoral will.

21.11.2025 14:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

And does that mean we are in a circumstance in which the leaders of government cannot be treated as legitimate: yes. We are in a legitimation crisis:

21.11.2025 14:19 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If they say something is law: check the law. It is untrue. If they say something is a fact: check the fact.

21.11.2025 14:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Since January 20, 2025 we comply because of what I call legitimation habits: the government provides us with reliable information, the government provides us with due process, and the government acts in a regular manner. None of that is true of the Trump Administration. Do not comply anymore.

21.11.2025 14:16 β€” πŸ‘ 15    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 1

And where you see colleges (like in Texas and Florida) that have to react to DEI instructions, it is because state legislatures have passed separate laws that do have the force of law.

21.11.2025 14:10 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes. Make them defend everything: so much has proven to be indefensible.

21.11.2025 13:58 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

An Executive Order on Diversity, Equity and Inclusionβ€”which at this point, multiple district court have invalid because it does not even define these key termsβ€”does not override statutory or even constitutional law.

21.11.2025 13:53 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

And for everyone running saying the President’s DEI order is law: that is wrong, it has been held invalid multiple times, and it still must comply with the statutory requirements outlined by Congress.

21.11.2025 13:43 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

You know what has the force of lawβ€”statutes passed by Congress.

21.11.2025 13:29 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Even Truman’s desegregation orderβ€”the most famous of them allβ€”was an instruction to the Army as a federal entity to desegregate its forces.

21.11.2025 13:29 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Justice Dept. Sues California Over College Benefits for Undocumented Students

My response as a college would to say, bring it on: it is time to start attacking executive order to the states or private entities that are not federal agencies, www.nytimes.com/2025/11/20/u.... An executive order is an instruction to a federal agency.

21.11.2025 13:29 β€” πŸ‘ 45    πŸ” 13    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 2

And by fools, I am also referring to the Supreme Court if they accept this contumely nonsense.

21.11.2025 12:51 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I then noted if he did access her mortgage application, he probably did so without permission.
Again, this is the evidence that Donald Trump is relying on to fire Lisa Cook, a case in front of the Supreme Court right now. And I figured this out by merely looking at the public record. Fools.

21.11.2025 12:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Again: Fools. I remember when I realized Bill Pulte was a fool when I had to go over to Twitter and read his letter criminally referring Lisa Cook and realizing he based a criminal referral on the standard term included in a mortgage statement (not the application).

21.11.2025 12:49 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Government Infrostructure serve a reliable source of information. Differences in race and ethnicity are vital for understanding how disease progress. I will say that an impacted patient should sue; the database cases have been successful on 1st Amendment grounds.

21.11.2025 04:07 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I mean, I am not going to take the time to roast them because that would mean I should take them seriously. And the Supreme Court would look incredibly foolish to rely on Bill Pulte’s testimony, or criminal referral.

21.11.2025 03:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I try to be nice, but they are fools.

21.11.2025 03:48 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

He + Ed Martin=Dumb and Dumber…

21.11.2025 03:44 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You know what we really need in the middle of an affordable housing crisis: an experienced expert running a the housing finance agency…not Bill Pulte, a man who can’t even conspiracy properly. I read his letter on Lisa Cook and clocked immediately he was an idiot.

21.11.2025 03:43 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Democratic time: tick, tick, tick.

21.11.2025 02:11 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

remember this "case" began with DHS press person claiming that multiple vehicles had ambushed and cornered CBP agents in a scene reminiscent of Baghdad 2007

20.11.2025 15:59 β€” πŸ‘ 715    πŸ” 251    πŸ’¬ 17    πŸ“Œ 7

They lied about it. All of it. A thug cop shot an unarmed woman five times without justification, boasted about it to his colleagues, and then this administration tried cover it all up by arresting her and charging her with felonies.

20.11.2025 18:24 β€” πŸ‘ 8184    πŸ” 2897    πŸ’¬ 76    πŸ“Œ 54

Mira Nair is the best!

20.11.2025 19:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Bicameral hatred is good; what is the need: Article I needs to be Article 1 again. Congress’s insufferable sense of its own institutional prerogatives is healthy.

20.11.2025 13:28 β€” πŸ‘ 41    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

To clarify, I do not believe there was a conspiracy, I just believe these are the policy choices of the Trump Administration! We believe in truth on this feed.

20.11.2025 13:05 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Sometimes, a conspiracy is the only way to explain policy.

20.11.2025 12:55 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@kalimurray is following 20 prominent accounts