This one goes up to 11.
07.08.2025 20:55 โ ๐ 6 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0@alexeigc.bsky.social
Sex Realist Football & beer Lover of non-men, especially terfy ones Lefty/liberal/life long Labour voter Adult human male Manchester UK Man City fan ๐๐๐๐๐ Pronouns: sex based, like the patriarchy ๐ I usually follow back.
This one goes up to 11.
07.08.2025 20:55 โ ๐ 6 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0It's spiteful, discriminatory and surely illegal. I'm very gender critical.
07.08.2025 20:51 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Trans genocide is a genocide in the same way trans women are women.
07.08.2025 19:00 โ ๐ 8 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I love a good purity spiral.
07.08.2025 12:44 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0What are they then?
06.08.2025 19:34 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Why, are you trans btw?
06.08.2025 19:31 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0But gay rights were definable, they existed. Trans rights aren't and don't.
06.08.2025 19:30 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Nonsense, it's the opposite. The only reason we have the GRA was to appease anti gay marriage Tory MPs.
06.08.2025 19:24 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Your point is that opposition to "trans rights" is intrinsically a right wing position. It's not because campaigning for trans rights is to prioritise the demands of a specific minority over the rights of others.
06.08.2025 19:22 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0None of this applies to trans people, there are no legal rights that trans people do not have compared to the rest of society.
06.08.2025 19:14 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Gay rights was a genuine civil rights movement. It was illegal to be gay, then the age of consent was higher than for heterosexuals, gay couples weren't allowed to get married or adopt, it was illegal to have gay sex in a property where a child was present, they couldn't join the armed forces, etc.
06.08.2025 19:12 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0I've never understood why some people are offended by breast feeding. I don't get it, what's the problem?
06.08.2025 18:29 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Why am I getting notifications for an 8 day old thread?
Oh it's a furry ๐คฎ
Some women are happy with male carers or male medical staff but that doesn't mean all women are. Women shouldn't be compelled to accept male assistance in situations where they feel vulnerable or are concerned about their privacy, safety or dignity.
06.08.2025 13:50 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Lol
05.08.2025 17:44 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Unusual for the MEN to allow comments on one of its regular pro-trans articles but they have in this case so if you can face the terrible website (I suggest using Brave, it's unusable in any other browser), go ahead and have your say.
05.08.2025 17:33 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Paywall free version here
archive.ph/nTDB9
Also Denise Fahmy, Rachel Meade and Roz Adams.
03.08.2025 19:15 โ ๐ 9 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Maya Forstater, Kathleen Stock, Jo Phoenix, etc, all won before the Supreme Court judgement.
03.08.2025 19:11 โ ๐ 14 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0And they all win, so hardly surprising. What's your definition of mass litigation btw?
03.08.2025 17:53 โ ๐ 9 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Even if this were true how is one side funded by Moscow the opposite of one side funded by Moscow?
03.08.2025 17:52 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0It's hardly "mass litigation" but he's quite correct to sue. What would you do if you were unfairly dismissed?
03.08.2025 17:50 โ ๐ 29 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0If GeoAmey thought what David said was unlawful one wonders who was responsible for their equality training. I think we can guess which type of organisation provided such training.
03.08.2025 15:24 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Even if this were possible it would be an implant not a transplant, which is why it's not possible.
02.08.2025 19:05 โ ๐ 4 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I'm in the UK obvs.
02.08.2025 18:39 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I use Spotify every day. Never been asked for age verification.
02.08.2025 18:38 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0Was it something I said? ๐ฎ
02.08.2025 13:52 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0