Jan Mewes's Avatar

Jan Mewes

@janmewes.bsky.social

Associate professor, Lund University, Sweden. Research on trust, welfare states, health and migration.

857 Followers  |  1,005 Following  |  95 Posts  |  Joined: 11.10.2023  |  2.0553

Latest posts by janmewes.bsky.social on Bluesky

Herzlichen Glückwunsch und viel Spaß!

01.10.2025 15:32 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Reminder to myself: look up social trust scores for India and Indonesia tomorrow.

15.09.2025 17:41 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
A bar chart showing Do people think elected officials are honest?

A 47% median of adults across 25 countries say few or none of their elected officials are honest. Roughly a third (36%) say some are honest. Only 14% believe this describes all or most officials in their country.

Perceptions of elected officials are especially negative in Greece and most of the African and Latin American countries surveyed. Roughly three-quarters of Greeks say few or none of their elected officials are honest. Majorities also take this stance in Argentina, Brazil, Italy, Kenya, Mexico and Nigeria. In fact, shares in these countries ranging from 15% to 31% of adults say none of their elected officials are honest.

A bar chart showing Do people think elected officials are honest? A 47% median of adults across 25 countries say few or none of their elected officials are honest. Roughly a third (36%) say some are honest. Only 14% believe this describes all or most officials in their country. Perceptions of elected officials are especially negative in Greece and most of the African and Latin American countries surveyed. Roughly three-quarters of Greeks say few or none of their elected officials are honest. Majorities also take this stance in Argentina, Brazil, Italy, Kenya, Mexico and Nigeria. In fact, shares in these countries ranging from 15% to 31% of adults say none of their elected officials are honest.

NEW: Say most elected officials in their country are honest
Sweden 36%
Indonesia 31%
Netherlands 30%
Canada 27%
Germany 26%
India 24%
France 22%
UK 21%

US 7%
www.pewresearch.org/global/2025/...

15.09.2025 17:08 — 👍 62    🔁 24    💬 3    📌 5
Post image

"French pensioners now have higher incomes than working-age adults" - extraordinary

By @jburnmurdoch.ft.com

www.ft.com/content/d419...

13.09.2025 10:31 — 👍 27    🔁 7    💬 2    📌 1
OSF

✨Accepted for Publication ✨

"Surveying Citizens with a Migration Background - A Quantitative Study of Identification versus Categorization"

Coming soon in the journal Survey Research Methods.

Read the pre-print here:

doi.org/10.31219/osf...

11.09.2025 13:00 — 👍 8    🔁 4    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
ggplot2 4.0.0 A new major version of ggplot2 has been released on CRAN. Find out what is new here.

I am beyond excited to announce that ggplot2 4.0.0 has just landed on CRAN.

It's not every day we have a new major #ggplot2 release but it is a fitting 18 year birthday present for the package.

Get an overview of the release in this blog post and be on the lookout for more in-depth posts #rstats

11.09.2025 11:20 — 👍 847    🔁 282    💬 9    📌 51
Under what circumstances does it make sense for me to appeal a decision? The answer is that you should appeal only if the following two things are true 

a) A reviewer made a flagrant error of interpretation as to what you had done, and 

b) The editors' letter indicates that this error was consequential for the decision. 

Note that (a) excludes differences of judgment of quality ("Reviewer A says it wasn't good enough, but it was!") and differences of interpretations of the data ("Reviewer A says my finding is due to selection, and I say it isn't!"). Note that (b) excludes times when the editorial letter passes over an error made by a reviewer in silence. 

The following are not justifications for making an appeal: 

c) You think a reviewer was biased or unfair. The editorial board understands that they have to contextualize different reviewers' positions to assemble a coherent expert judgment of a manuscript. 

d) You think that the reviewers in general are supportive. Because we can only publish a fraction of the papers that are submitted, we must reject some papers that are good, and that reviewers think are good, to make space for those that reviewers, and we, think are of outstanding importance. Further, reviewers sometimes use gentler and more supportive language in their comments to the author than they do in their comments to the editor. 

e) A reviewer found a problem in a revised manuscript that is inherent in the design seemingly acceptable in the first round of review. We do our best never to reject manuscripts upon review for reasons that should have been raised when the manuscript was first submitted. However, one reason we do add new reviewers in the R&R stage is to catch weaknesses that may have been previously missed, and if these are believed to be uncorrectable, a rejection is the only proper decision.

Under what circumstances does it make sense for me to appeal a decision? The answer is that you should appeal only if the following two things are true a) A reviewer made a flagrant error of interpretation as to what you had done, and b) The editors' letter indicates that this error was consequential for the decision. Note that (a) excludes differences of judgment of quality ("Reviewer A says it wasn't good enough, but it was!") and differences of interpretations of the data ("Reviewer A says my finding is due to selection, and I say it isn't!"). Note that (b) excludes times when the editorial letter passes over an error made by a reviewer in silence. The following are not justifications for making an appeal: c) You think a reviewer was biased or unfair. The editorial board understands that they have to contextualize different reviewers' positions to assemble a coherent expert judgment of a manuscript. d) You think that the reviewers in general are supportive. Because we can only publish a fraction of the papers that are submitted, we must reject some papers that are good, and that reviewers think are good, to make space for those that reviewers, and we, think are of outstanding importance. Further, reviewers sometimes use gentler and more supportive language in their comments to the author than they do in their comments to the editor. e) A reviewer found a problem in a revised manuscript that is inherent in the design seemingly acceptable in the first round of review. We do our best never to reject manuscripts upon review for reasons that should have been raised when the manuscript was first submitted. However, one reason we do add new reviewers in the R&R stage is to catch weaknesses that may have been previously missed, and if these are believed to be uncorrectable, a rejection is the only proper decision.

When (if ever) is it right to appeal a rejection? This advice offered by AJS seems good more generally

09.09.2025 12:45 — 👍 15    🔁 4    💬 2    📌 0
Post image

Very powerful statement by 200+ faculty from Bar-Ilan University, not known as the most progressive university in Israel (to put it mildly). Respect! 🙌

29.08.2025 03:08 — 👍 92    🔁 27    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Making Regression Coefficient Plots in Stata Traditionally, researchers reported results of regression analyses using tables. A more visually appealing way of presenting these results is by using a coefficient plot. Unlike a typical scatterplot…

If you use Stata and you want to make nice coefficient plots, this article by @uptonorwell.bsky.social is really fantastic!

medium.com/the-stata-ga...

24.08.2025 14:10 — 👍 13    🔁 5    💬 1    📌 0
Poster for the Institute for Analytical Sociology (IAS) Programme Autumn 2025 at Linköping University. The text explains that the seminars feature international scholars, are open to all, and will be broadcast on Zoom.

Poster for the Institute for Analytical Sociology (IAS) Programme Autumn 2025 at Linköping University. The text explains that the seminars feature international scholars, are open to all, and will be broadcast on Zoom.

✨ The IAS Seminar Series returns for the Fall 2025 semester with a stellar lineup of speakers and thought-provoking talks. Open to all!

#AcademicSky #Sociology #CSS

19.08.2025 12:23 — 👍 40    🔁 18    💬 1    📌 3

Repeat after me, folks: All. Graded. Work. Must. Be. Done. In. Class. Take it from the people who come from cultures where (human) cheating has always been rampant.

18.08.2025 08:26 — 👍 66    🔁 11    💬 7    📌 1

The worrisome problem is how to change higher education programs whose whole point is to train students how to write. If the goal is to learn academic writing, then in-class assignments are strictly speaking „un-aligned“ with the learning outcomes. But all writing at home is now under AI suspicion

18.08.2025 20:00 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
EconPapers: Rising Inequality, Declining Mobility: The Evolution of Intergenerational Mobility in Germany By Julia Baarck, Moritz Bode and Andreas Peichl; Abstract: This paper is the first to show that intergenerational income mobility in Germany has decreased over time. We provide

New paper reveals widespread decline in intergenerational economic mobility in 🇩🇪 for those born in the 70s and 80s. Similarly, educational inequality by parent income has also been increasing.

1/2

econpapers.repec.org/paper/cesces...

18.08.2025 18:48 — 👍 18    🔁 8    💬 2    📌 0

UiT lyser ut en svært spennende stipendiatstilling i statsvitenskap. For oss er det viktig å være ledende på samfunn i nord og det er naturlig å forske på valgprosessen til den viktigste institusjonen i det samiske demokratiet. LIK og DEL! www.jobbnorge.no/ledige-still...

18.08.2025 11:52 — 👍 2    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

How big is the field though

18.08.2025 11:36 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
When the guns fall silent: the variety of European perspectives on the end of war in Ukraine Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has sparked intense geopolitical debates and public reflection across Europe regarding the likely trajectory and resolution of the conflict. Public expectations about t...

🇺🇸-🇺🇦-🇪🇺 As Trump meets Zelensky + European leaders today to discuss ending Russia’s war, it’s important to know: European citizens themselves see the war’s end very differently. My new study in ‪@jei-publication.bsky.social‬ explores these divides 👉 shorturl.at/Mw8KE

18.08.2025 07:32 — 👍 5    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

I have seen teams of PhD level experts fail at almost everything imaginable, including, but not limited to: agreeing on a place to have lunch, making coffee and finding a bus stop. And I have been on all those teams.

07.08.2025 20:01 — 👍 118    🔁 20    💬 2    📌 0

So this is meant by „large language“ models!

08.08.2025 04:18 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

It's hard to fathom that every 6-8 years UK universities spend years and hundreds of millions doing something that can be done in an afternoon by one person with access to impact-factor weighted citation counts.

06.08.2025 08:28 — 👍 43    🔁 10    💬 3    📌 1

Do generous welfare policies foster political trust? Matthijs Gillissen, @silkegoubin.bsky.social & Anna Ruelens examine the long-term effects of welfare generosity on trust in political institutions. Read more:
buff.ly/tBe6gLG

@polstudiesassoc.bsky.social @uoypolitics.bsky.social @sagepub.com

16.07.2025 12:03 — 👍 8    🔁 6    💬 0    📌 1
Post image

Using time series graphs to make causal claims be like

14.07.2025 12:12 — 👍 854    🔁 160    💬 11    📌 7

Danke 🙏 - und Repost aus ... aktuell gegebenem Anlass.

30.06.2025 10:20 — 👍 39    🔁 5    💬 2    📌 0
Video thumbnail

Absolutely incredible turnout for Budapest Pride! So proud of all the organizers, including some old friends, who estimate hundreds of thousands— major embarrassment to Orban

28.06.2025 17:23 — 👍 38848    🔁 8134    💬 510    📌 807
Vergütungen bei Tarifvertraglichen Ausbildungen steigen: Die prozentuale Erhöhung der tarifvertraglichen Ausbildungsvergütungen im Ausbildungsjahr 2024/2025 liegt bei 6,4 Prozent. Es gibt kaum noch Branchen, in denen Auszubildende im ersten Jahr weniger 
als 1.000 Euro pro Monat verdienen. Quelle: WSI-Tarifarchiv

Vergütungen bei Tarifvertraglichen Ausbildungen steigen: Die prozentuale Erhöhung der tarifvertraglichen Ausbildungsvergütungen im Ausbildungsjahr 2024/2025 liegt bei 6,4 Prozent. Es gibt kaum noch Branchen, in denen Auszubildende im ersten Jahr weniger als 1.000 Euro pro Monat verdienen. Quelle: WSI-Tarifarchiv

(1/4) Eine aktuelle Studie des @wsiinstitut.bsky.social zeigt: #Fachkräftemangel führt in vielen Tarifbranchen zu überdurchschnittlichen Erhöhungen der #Ausbildungsvergütungen. 2024/2025 sind diese im 1. Ausbildungsjahr um 6,4 Prozent gestiegen. 🚀 Spitzenreiter sind Pflegeberufe (Öffentl. Dienst). 👇

24.06.2025 08:54 — 👍 24    🔁 9    💬 1    📌 0

Hey Bluesky. Let's try to discuss this "war" without using antisemitic tropes, ok? Thank you! 🙏

22.06.2025 08:44 — 👍 81    🔁 8    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

It's so crazy -- asking a bunch of people the same question and then adding up the answers -- it just might work. We could call it a shmurvey.

19.06.2025 03:40 — 👍 10    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

Big data!

19.06.2025 05:06 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Associate Senior Lecturer in Sociology Job Duties We are seeking a sociologist at the early stage of their career. The position includes both research and teaching in sociology at undergraduate and advanced levels. The position consists of

lu.varbi.com/en/what:job/... My department in Lund is looking for a tenure track assistant professor. We are especially looking for someone with experience in qualitative criminology. Spread the word and/or apply! Deadline in August.

18.06.2025 13:02 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I guess I meant „to help make this happen“ 😅

13.06.2025 07:55 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

@janmewes is following 20 prominent accounts