Probably a trick from Mandelson's playbook
09.02.2026 19:49 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0
A letter from Carlos HernΓ‘ndez, the Spanish journalist who died this week.
Our job as journalists is to hold power to account, explain what's happening and give voice to the voiceless. Many still do this, but we don't do it enough. It's a big reason why trust in the mainstream media has cratered.
Agreed. It's more the principle of being judged by your peers, of having a check on state power. It's a long-standing safeguard in England. And it's being removed at a time when it feels increasingly important!
06.02.2026 11:33 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It does, and the irony? Officials often say they want to avoid giving contracts to British firms for fear of a perceived conflict of interest.
06.02.2026 10:53 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Great analysis. It was also clear from the beginning it wouldn't work. Guy's and St Thomas's was the model for all this, but after starting the programme the trust's wait times fell slower than the national average and the theatre staff went on strike...
06.02.2026 10:24 β π 4 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0Agreed!
04.02.2026 15:28 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Democracy needs juries
04.02.2026 15:18 β π 18 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0Yes, this an extreme example of why trust in the establishment is at an all-time low. For too long elites have been acting in their own interests and not in the country's, partly because we've been reluctant to call it out for what it is: corruption. Hard to avoid that now.
04.02.2026 12:06 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Hence why they took so long to ratify the UNESCO convention! That's what the article is about.
30.05.2025 09:04 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Haha not enough space sadly! So much to write about it
30.05.2025 09:02 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Enjoyed writing about the two faces of Harley Street this week. Home to 40% of London's private healthcare market, it's known for its quality and treating royals. It's also where TikTokkers go for botched penis-filler ops and sperm-salmon facials. A townhouse was once a hub for international fraud
30.05.2025 08:33 β π 12 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0I agree, but for a different reason!
30.05.2025 07:56 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0True! π
29.05.2025 21:17 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Haha I think if a wheel of cheese hit you in the face at 70mph anyone would be intolerant! (It is a risk apparently)
29.05.2025 18:14 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Ah, Iβll have to try to wing a trip to Finland next time! Wife carrying races sound fun
29.05.2025 18:12 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Certainly more action than golf!
29.05.2025 13:31 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I respectfully disagree :)
29.05.2025 13:29 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Indeed, would ruin the fun!
29.05.2025 13:28 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
My take on Englandβs daftest sport: Should cheese rolling be protected as British heritage?
economist.com/britain/2025...
The PM has just announced the abolition of NHS England, the body responsible for running the Β£192bn NHS.
That was just a formality though: it's death was confirmed with a DOGE-style purge that I wrote about this week. Too soon to say whether it will devolve power or centralise it even further.
This is only getting clearer by the day.
01.03.2025 01:22 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I was talking about Access to Work, not the benefits system in general (which I pointed out is stingy). Iβm by no means an expert, but I was on disability benefits myself for 7 years as well as doing some reporting on them. So I think I have some idea, but of course youβre entitled to disagree ;)
14.02.2025 12:48 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I think we mostly agree Chaminda. The problem is thats not at all how the current system is set up! We need a scheme that can be used by all who most need it, but it would not be sustainable for that to be the level of support that is currently for a select few. The question is what to do instead.
14.02.2025 10:47 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It was mostly looking at coaching (youβre right that mental-health support is provided separately), which is classified as a form of support work. If you look at the graph thatβs whatβs skyrocketed in recent years, and is why the DWP has cut hourly rates from Β£450 to Β£205 and capped nos of sessions
14.02.2025 10:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Suggest you read my article. Itβs not exaggerated, thats where the biggest increase in spending seems to be coming from. Hence why itβs topical
14.02.2025 10:12 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0But whereβs the evidence that is does? And surely when it comes to public money, isnβt the question whether this is really the most effective use of it? I get that for some with high needs they will need more support from a scheme like this. But for others it seems unfair to give to a select few
14.02.2025 10:11 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Do you think we should be spending millions of pounds so a few thousand office workers who know about a scheme can receive unregulated ADHD coaching 1-1, at Β£200+ per hour? I personally donβt think thatβs the best use of taxpayersβ money, even if it helps those individuals.
14.02.2025 10:09 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0An article I did recently on this unfortunately ended up getting sensationalised in the right-wing press. But clearly there are signs that the incentives have become distorted (e.g. how is it way easier for an influencer to get Β£70k from AtW than receive PIP?) The whole thing needs reforming
14.02.2025 10:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Sure, the imperative to cut costs is bad. But looking at the figures, itβs clear that the system was never really designed to support those with greatest need, just those who were best at articulating their needs. It becomes unviable as soon as more people find out about it, as has happened recently
14.02.2025 10:01 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 3 π 0