The political effects of X's feed algorithm
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10098-2
Received: 16 December 2024
Accepted: 4 January 2026
Published online: 18 February 2026
Open access
• Check for updates
Germain Gauthier,5, Roland Hodler?5, Philine Widmer35 & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya3,4,5 m
Feed algorithms are widely suspected to influence political attitudes. However, previous evidence from switching off the algorithm on Meta platforms found no political effects'. Here we present results from a 2023 field experiment on Elon Musk's platform X shedding light on this puzzle. We assigned active US-based users randomly to either an algorithmic or a chronological feed for 7 weeks, measuring political attitudes and online behaviour. Switching from a chronological to an algorithmic feed increased engagement and shifted political opinion towards more conservative positions, particularly regarding policy priorities, perceptions of criminal investigations into Donald Trump and views on the war in Ukraine. In contrast, switching from the algorithmic to the chronological feed had no comparable effects.
Neither switching the algorithm on nor switching it off significantly affected affective polarization or self-reported partisanship. To investigate the mechanism, we analysed users' feed content and behaviour. We found that the algorithm promotes conservative content and demotes posts by traditional media. Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm, helping explain the asymmetry in effects. These results suggest that initial exposure to X's algorithm has persistent effects on users' current political attitudes and account-following behaviour, even in the absence of a detectable effect on partisanship.
A new paper shows that less than 2 months of exposure to Twitter’s algorithmic feed significantly shifts people’s political views to the right.
Moving from chronological feed to the algorithmic feed also increases engagement.
This is one of the most concerning papers I’ve read in awhile.
19.02.2026 18:57 —
👍 6356
🔁 3169
💬 159
📌 395
This App Warns You if Someone Is Wearing Smart Glasses Nearby
The creator of Nearby Glasses made the app after reading 404 Media's coverage of how people are using Meta's Ray-Bans smartglasses to film people without their knowledge or consent. “I consider it to...
The creator of Nearby Glasses made the app after reading 404 Media's coverage of how people are using Meta's Ray-Bans smartglasses to film people without their knowledge or consent. “I consider it to be a tiny part of resistance against surveillance tech.”
24.02.2026 16:15 —
👍 1066
🔁 487
💬 18
📌 36
From Citizen Ideas to Bills
Inside Brazil’s Senate’s New System for Linking Public Input to Lawmaking
"By connecting the citizens’ idea database directly to the workflow of the Senate’s Legislative Consultancy, the tool transforms a largely underused archive into a resource for drafting bills" modparl.substack.com/p/from-citiz...
24.02.2026 08:16 —
👍 1
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 1
This is great overview of key data governance terms and ideas:
18.02.2026 08:32 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Blog - Open Data Policy Lab
Data governance without the jargon: 30 questions and answers to clarify terms and trends opendatapolicylab.org/articles/new...
18.02.2026 06:32 —
👍 3
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 1
Semantic ablation: Why AI writing is boring and dangerous
opinion: The subtractive bias we're ignoring
“A jpeg of thought”
“What began as a jagged, precise Romanesque structure of stone is eroded into a polished, Baroque plastic shell: it looks "clean" to the casual eye, but its structural integrity – its "ciccia" – has been ablated to favor a hollow, frictionless aesthetic.”
17.02.2026 06:28 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
The WhatsApp moment for money is here
This is the year that stablecoins are becoming part of the mainstream for online and international payments
😂
“The writer is a general partner at Andreessen Horowitz and leads its crypto investment arm”
The WhatsApp moment for money is here
12.02.2026 13:42 —
👍 2
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
“I now had to meticulously fact-check every single thing in the articles. And at least 60% of it would be completely made up,” she says. “I would just end up rewriting most of the article. So something that would take me two hours now took me four hours, making half the money.”
11.02.2026 07:10 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
cognitive sovereignty....
10.02.2026 13:46 —
👍 72
🔁 14
💬 5
📌 0
#sovereigntystack - from individual, to state…
10.02.2026 13:47 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I’d argue driven also by development organizations need to have solutions that obviate the difficult work of engaging with politics and power
10.02.2026 07:24 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Indian police commissioner wants ID cards for AI agents
Asia In Brief: PLUS: China broadens cryptocurrency crackdown; Australian facial recognition privacy revisited; Singapore debuts electric VTOL; and more!
For all the talk about agents as the future (state, personal productive blah blah blah) we've yet to solve for the basic authorisation / verification / accountability identity chain:
Indian police commissioner wants ID cards for AI agents • The Register
09.02.2026 10:12 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
"The council argues that selling property to fund an IT project, which would ordinarily be paid for using ongoing revenue, is justified because long-term savings are expected through "automation and enabling more tasks to be undertaken via self-service,"
🙄😐🤯🤬
09.02.2026 10:07 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0