deron dixon

Fun.

Your every response has shown you have no clue of the voting populace, no clue of what "the rest" of the country thinks, hell, I'm not even sure you understand that there are people that aren't you.

However, w/ your incredible lack of understanding, am sure you are destined f/ corner office at DNC.

And then we start talking a/b the fact that you didn't all vote f/ Harris.

Every Govt spokesperson is a Z/milennial women-- Boebert, MTG, half of NRC, EVERY FEMALE MAGA INFLUENCER is a Z/Mil, & you say "we all voted for Harris".

Just so ignorant.
And your clapbacks are arrogant, & ignorant.

Get a clue of the big picture.
Population in America is 345 million.
65% voted = 177 mil.
Gen Z & Milenial women = 56 mil voting age.
Turnout was 50% f/ those two, meaning 28 mil voted.
Trump got 52 million votes from women I just showed you.

24 million more THAN ALL OF YOU COMBINED.

177 mil voted, 53% women, 93.8 mil.
demo split
White 77% of women's vote (wv) -- 55% f/ Trump -- 39.7 mil.
Hispanic 11% of wv -- 48% Trump -- 9.4 mil
Asian 3% of wv -- 40% Trump -- 2.8 mil

Total 51.9 mil voters in 3 demos.
Out of 93.8 mil.
A clear majority.

Real numbers.

Not your BS.

Why is a guy who was a total failure as a player given any attention as to his viewpoint?
Why is he a source for anything?
It's like asking a sixth grade drop out to discuss high school education.
Why would anyone do that?

And by the way, the thread is clear, "the other guy" was defending the "most" statement.
It's right there in the thread.
Your response is moronically pedantic.
Shows you can't follow a normal train of thought, and instead look for some sort of technicality to hang your hat on- simpleton behavior

Thank you for your useless clarification that is off point & meaningless.
One doesn't eliminate the other, they are both tragically wrong, don't speak to my comments, and are a conflation of what has been said, shows you-- as i have pointed -- to possess a lack of critical thinking skills.

You dumbasses.
Ted wasn't president, Bobby wasn't president, JFK jr wasn't president.
Ypur point is about presidents.
Do you not see how non responsive, off point and basically, meaningless that is?
Like a small child's logic, entirely lacking in context.

And this is the biggest pile of gibberish yet.
Conflate everything and act like you are deep.
Other fellow idiot silo dwellers are the only ones won't catch on to that pile of rubbish.
Stop acting like you know things, your lack of knowledge is on full display here.

The critical thinking on this thread is specious at best.
So non boomer women are involved with him, but non boomer women find him totally unattractive?
It's just flat out amazing how you all can type, but don't understand that the words contradict your points.
Stunning.

But MOST agree with you?
You can't even put up two texts in a row without contradicting yourself.

It doesn't matter if there is a generational divide, moron.
The fact is you said MOST-- and there isn't a shred of evidence to support that.
And, by the way, just b/c you have heard the phrase "generational divide" used, doesn't mean you know what it means. It has nothing to do with my point.

I don't know what the fuck this word salad is supposed to mean.

That's not what I said.
Your desire to have your opinion heard seems to outweigh any grasp of facts you may tenuously possess.
You just decided to say i said something else.
That's what MAGA hats do all the time.
Are you sure you aren't confused and should be on twitter?

Dumb ass.

No less on point than your words.

Over 50% of white women voted Trump.
You say most, most requires all of you a lot of them- just straight up false to say most.
Shows you lack vision beyond your silo.
Reason we are in this situation is more of them voted than us.
So you may want to, at some point, consider the rest of the country.

Stop it.
There've been women swooning over Kennedy family members f/ 75 years.
They've all been assholes- Ted left a date in a submerged car, JFK cheated w/ Marilyn, JKS raped a woman- I can go on & on.
Women have still held them up as an ideal.
We have all watched.

"Most of us" is total bullshit.

The winner will get 12%...
...then wonder why he has high negatives in the first polls.

THIS.

Snakes in a pit bite each other - a/b 10 influencers have gone after each other in the last month - we should let them harm each other W/OUT GIVING ONE THE ADVANTAGE OF THE OTHER BEING SUPPORTED BY THE LEFT.
Keep the fight fair, let them punch themselves out- let them split their support.

I see paper tiger is re-posting...

Absurdity of liking a post, where person is using rationale of"being supportive", while showing themselves to be both projecting & confessing.
THIS IS WHY WE LOSE.
Another personality cult w/ no objectivity, and insecure folks looking for approval fr/ each other.

Original point was moronic.
Defense ridiculous.
Discussion of my feelings, when you have no where-with-all to know anything about my feelings, as a deflection, only shows what I was pointing out.
You are failing and if you want change, you have to change.

I await your next avoidance of the point.

People care a/b climate change, so you come up w/ Green New Deal, attaching ten other things to it, that make sure now climate change stuff doesn't pass.

Health care is an 80% issue, you make sure it's expanded to undocumented, etc etc -- you sink the chance we had for health care.

& help no one

Bullshit! not talking in shorthand.
You are saying exact shit your losing candidates say.

Can't get someone elected to office.
So decide to take all the issues & bundle them together, sinking ones that could pass w/ the ones that never will pass.

End result: help no one.

SOP f/ Left America.

Socialists hold less than .5% of elected offices.
Here you come, pushing f/ socialist policy, calling it socialist policy & when someone says, "can you suggest something that might work, rather than something that is always doomed to failure"...

...you go with "code switch".

Total bullshit.

This is the point -demonstrably true point- running as socialists has produced almost nothing in terms of elected office.
DSA brags of having 250 elected officials at loc/state/fed level.

542 federal
7400 state legislators
50 states/12 offices

8,500 and we haven't done local, yet.

250 is no one.

Socialism doesn't work b/c people calling f/ it, in America, don't have any fucking idea of how to convince anyone, of anything, at anytime.
Look at results of elections involving socialists.
A series of abject failures.
Yet here you are, trotting out same damn thing & expecting a different result.

Oh yeah, and by the way...

I see you chose to "clap back and prove you are a paper tiger".

What a fucking surprise.
If you want change, you need to change what you are doing, too.
Because what you are doing now hasn't worked yet-- when I say "yet", I could also be saying "ever".

Code switch?
Jesus Christ. What a pile of shit.

Not one thought a/b salability of policy, I point it out, and you go with "code switch"?
THIS IS WHY WE ALWAYS LOSE.
We don't talk to anyone else, don't try, then say those you didn't talk to are stupid, when you lose.

Take some responsibility.

Example used was a perfect case -- a teachable moment -- take it to heart & use it, or just clap back & show me you are a paper tiger.
If you want to change things, you have to convince those WHO DON'T AGREE W/ YOU.
Or you can just post f/ "likes" fr/ those who do agree w/ you.

You define you.