Ali Shourideh's Avatar

Ali Shourideh

@shourideh.bsky.social

Economic Theorist at CMU

659 Followers  |  149 Following  |  93 Posts  |  Joined: 22.09.2023  |  2.2401

Latest posts by shourideh.bsky.social on Bluesky

85 million people. It’s hard to forget that the war on terror gave the world more terror. Anyways, if you see someone from Iran these days go easy on them. We didn’t choose this.

18.06.2025 01:09 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

that in order to get a hostile entity be incentivized, you have to create costs for them. Unfortunately, at this point it’s hard to see how these attacks - supported by all leaders of the β€œfree” world - even if they lead to a regime change will bring peace, prosperity and democracy for a country of

18.06.2025 01:09 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

nuclear program. We are also being bombarded at the behest of a war mongering criminal who seems like soon will be joined by another opportunist. It’s hard to describe the extent of hopelessness that this entails. As far as I can tell, wars don’t bring democracy and peace. The economist in me knows

18.06.2025 01:09 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I don’t know if anyone actually sees this given that I never post but here it goes. If you see Iranians these days be a bit gentler with them. We are going through something horrific. Our nation is in the hand of a few individuals who don’t seem to care about anything other than having a useless

18.06.2025 01:09 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Question for political scientists/economists: obviously trump has in numerous times tried and or successfully violated the role of law. But this is not limited to him. Obama infamously killed a U.S. citizen without due process. So my question is whether these violations are ever quantified.

13.05.2025 17:05 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hard to argue with Matthias here. Big loss for us and good for Europe.

23.04.2025 15:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I realize maybe tit-for-tat is not the right word to use here but say I am a referee and for some idiosyncratic reason i don't like something in a paper. If I am a repeat referee I keep rejecting the paper. The tit-for-tat can happen if the authors learn my identity and use the same strategy on me!

17.04.2025 02:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Wouldn’t you want to avoid tit for tat behavior in refereeing?

16.04.2025 22:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Statutory or the actual ones paid?

15.04.2025 22:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Just so it’s clear, the government wanted to oversee hiring and employment at a *private* institution in order to implement a purity test. When the institution refused, they took away money for life saving research (cancer etc).

That’s some fascist shit.

15.04.2025 12:34 β€” πŸ‘ 24    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh that! Sure. I read the Atlantic, New Yorker and the Wired. Everywhere else I just follow the headlines. No reason to read the texts!!

21.03.2025 18:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I didn’t get the NYT part!?πŸ€”

21.03.2025 12:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Happy Norwooz!
Tomorrow is the winter solstice and official start of spring ! Beyond its symbolic significance, it’s a time of cleaning. Let’s hope for this particular cleaning sometime soon (and those in the west who wish to act accordingly)!

19.03.2025 15:18 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Even when they have time, the opponents, they don’t seem to know where to run !!!(schumer)

16.03.2025 19:04 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yet everyday something new and unbelievable! WTH??!!

16.03.2025 18:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Is the logic very different from equilibria involved in Pareto dominated strategies in infinitely repeated games?

13.03.2025 18:10 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

there is an obscure old one that Ricky Vohra told us about by Anderson and Nash! I haven’t read it super carefully but it has some very powerful results!

12.03.2025 22:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

And ignoring any experts’ advice.

10.03.2025 17:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

While I think invasion of Iraq was worse for the world than trump up to now, I think there is a difference here. That was done within the confines of the democratic institutions - majority U.S. population was behind it, and some experts. What’s happening now is outside of the democratic institutions

10.03.2025 17:03 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Spare a thought for your green-card holding and naturalized colleagues, many of whom are now doing risk-benefit calculations before speaking on anything that could be considered remotely political

10.03.2025 13:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1616    πŸ” 439    πŸ’¬ 27    πŸ“Œ 35

My personal opinion is that Hamas is ultimately responsible for all the atrocities committed by Israel. Yet, how can we possibly punish a person for simply stating they are pro Hamas?

10.03.2025 04:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
US authorities arrest Palestinian student protester at Columbia University, students say The detention of graduate student Mahmoud Khalil appears to be one of the first efforts by Donald Trump to fulfill his promise to seek the deportation of some foreign students involved in the pro-Palestinian protest movement.

The thunderstorm of terrible U.S. government actions continues. Free speech is only applied selectively! I read the coverage of several outlets and it seems like the only crime here is supporting Hamas.
www.reuters.com/world/us/us-...

10.03.2025 04:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

People on the left might be mad at me for saying this due to her position on abortion but isn't it better if we can have a position that doesn't fit the party line and that does not warrant wanting to punch each other?

08.03.2025 00:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

That is why I found the fact that someone deemed to be on the very right voted without her politics is something to celebrate. I am sure she got some angry phone calls from the orange man or the genius with the buzzsaw! Maybe something positive to hang on to but maybe too early!

08.03.2025 00:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

To call myself angry these days whenever I open my browser and I am not reading a math theorem is an understatement! I find it extremely difficult to see anything positive. And I was able to in '17 despite being on the receiving end of the muslim ban!

08.03.2025 00:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Many congrats!

06.03.2025 14:05 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I have to admit that while people are quite shocked by the WH events today, to me this is simply just a sign of what this administration is doing. In fact, perhaps it is quite good that Zelensky decided fight back against the bogus claims. To me, we crossed a line when we voted for Russia in the UN!

28.02.2025 21:17 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Never mind!! Very hard to avoid it!!! :-(

28.02.2025 19:30 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

What happened? Sorry I try to not read the news for my alright quite high levels of anger!

28.02.2025 18:43 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

But am I wrong to think that it didn’t go mainstream and in the public discourse until the 2010s?

21.02.2025 23:01 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@shourideh is following 20 prominent accounts