Ok🫡
29.09.2024 00:47 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@biruz.bsky.social
Minha crítica é inefável e minha parrésia é grandiosa; minha eloquência, contudo, é um lixo.
Ok🫡
29.09.2024 00:47 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Yeah. Any non-superpowered guy should have at least some difficulty
24.09.2024 12:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Personally, this is one of my biggest gripes with reincarnation/time-reversing stories. The main character somehow has perfect memory, and his younger self is never better than his old self outside of a healthier body.
It's good to know that people share this same opinion.
Cute
23.09.2024 10:49 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Cartoon person saying I MUST WORK! BUT ALSO 1 MUST REST. I KNOW! I'LL MAKE A COMPROMISE! TODAY I SHALL NEITHER WORK NOR REST BUT I WILL FEEL VERY BAD ABOUT IT. By @WORRY LINES
21.09.2024 19:20 — 👍 6141 🔁 1715 💬 44 📌 140Gotta admit that "Character Limit" is a cool name
22.09.2024 07:58 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0You can have the same benefits to even greater extents depending on the method used and exact content viewed.
19.09.2024 18:28 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Even though overweight isn't obese, people treat them as the same due to this family resemblance and the overuse of both. The more words represent particulars, the better.
Just some tips for your position.
In other words, this particular change would not only give any benefits, but also add some negatives to the body positive community; "hear-effect" would become more negative as concept creep tunes in(even more of the "fat-scare"), e.g "overweight".
19.09.2024 17:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0At the same time, "Cardiovascular Risk" expresses a whole range of risks, which Obesity is its most extreme end. One being diagnosed as "obese" is obviously worse than "a little fat".
19.09.2024 17:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0"Obesity" is a medical term and, as a result, will be dissociated from body weight if the study concludes that the concept isn't strictly necessary for its definition.
People only use it to express body weight because the medical definition says so.
Therefore, changing the name won't be necessary.
Bluesky now has over 10 million users, and I was #7,148,028!
Kinda late ngl
My point isn't that Lula is better or worse than Bolsonaro—nor if it's the Legislative or Executive Power's fault—, but that Ms. Campello put one on the center and front for one crisis and is not doing the same when her supported side is in essentially the same situation as the first.
19.09.2024 11:56 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Really good article. Also, the law school joke was fantastic
19.09.2024 11:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Is it only me or something here doesn't quite seem right?
Haven't you been putting "too much focus on the executive" during the Bozo's presidency and now you're stepping back because it's your guy letting shit burn and die?
Quite hypocritical.
Você fica enviando postagens, ué. Quer o quê? Que eu as ignore?
16.09.2024 14:28 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Você já corre em Kart?
16.09.2024 14:09 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Ovo naun
16.09.2024 13:13 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0☝️🤓
16.09.2024 13:12 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Eu perguntei ao 54 qual era a resposta para tudo; ele me falou: "83."
16.09.2024 13:09 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0That's a good joke
But lemme be a pedant rq tho
"Wealth of Nations" was just formalizing and building upon events and characteristics of capitalism that were already happening since the beginnings of the 18th Century, mainly the division of labor. And this is acknowledged even in the first chapter
If people want chicken sandwich, they will get chicken sandwich. If they don't want chicken sandwich, they may buy another product. I would love to compare it to communist countries, but they sadly don't have even the bread to make the sandwich in the first place.
01.09.2024 21:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Fui bloqueado pelo moleque burro que não providenciou um argumento bomKKKKKKK
01.09.2024 17:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Okay, then, send me the debunks. Wikipedia, Forbes, various authors, other websites and the academic consensus seem to agree with my point of view.
01.09.2024 17:40 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Agradeço demais por estes vinte caracteres adicionais que são dados pelo site em comparação ao Twitter. São essenciais para livremente poder me expressar.
01.09.2024 17:39 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0No, actually. IQ is *the* most well-established and respected model in psychometrics. Most critics report that it doesn't cover all intelligences, but this just does not matter for this discussion, since the correlation I showed is backed by evidence. Stop equivocating.
01.09.2024 16:45 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Intensively*
01.09.2024 14:48 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Your opinion is just wrong by virtue of how IQ works. Fortune 500s have an average of 124 points. And IQ correlates intensevily with low time preference and long-term strategical thinking.
01.09.2024 14:48 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Good one
01.09.2024 14:43 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0O último ali matou a vibe
01.09.2024 14:40 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0