@ggkrishnamoomoo.bsky.social
Professor, Maryland Carey Law (he/him)
Nobel Committee should declare the winner of the World Cup.
05.12.2025 23:06 — 👍 248 🔁 39 💬 7 📌 2The new kill bill is an hour long?
05.12.2025 19:35 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0🤯
05.12.2025 10:27 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Holy shit @pablo.show
I was not super interested and then BAM. Always watch PTFO till the end
youtu.be/Le4j0Goj1NI?...
I'm just about halfway through. I think the last couple of seasons, Streep was awesome, and Rudd was charming
05.12.2025 04:52 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0New Nuremburg is the moderate option.
05.12.2025 02:12 — 👍 230 🔁 31 💬 2 📌 1Agree, Téa Leoni 💯
05.12.2025 02:55 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I’m still willing to watch but man only murders in the building really dropped off this season
05.12.2025 02:52 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 3 📌 0Where did the car land in Thelma and Louise?
05.12.2025 01:35 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Obviously not even close to the most batshit thing about this, but shouldn’t it end “Jesus could absolutely return as AI”?
05.12.2025 00:53 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0That seems like a reason to do it
04.12.2025 14:12 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0the Sam Altman biopic is definitely going to be called Attention Is All You Need
03.12.2025 20:43 — 👍 172 🔁 8 💬 8 📌 21-(.75^23)
03.12.2025 00:25 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Anytime you see a story like this
(Parents, partner, lottery)
I don’t see it tbh
29.11.2025 20:44 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Northwestern Wildcucks
29.11.2025 03:47 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
That’s a shame
27.11.2025 22:42 — 👍 9 🔁 1 💬 2 📌 0To be fair, that is where those scholars reside
23.11.2025 19:41 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0He isn’t for me. Despite my sports obsessions, I haven’t seen a second of Stephen A Smith or Pat McAfee for the last two months, and cannot recommend more highly
21.11.2025 20:27 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Wait but the opposition was mobilized because of the threat to democracy…?!?!
21.11.2025 01:59 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It would be interesting if America found religion again through anti-fascism
20.11.2025 21:41 — 👍 10 🔁 3 💬 2 📌 0If I were Comey I’d be arguing that 18 usc 3288/3289 does not apply because this is not a dismissal of an indictment. There is just no indictment to be dismissed
20.11.2025 18:57 — 👍 5 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Could be, but now we know the Epstein files have lots of hits from “Trump”—probably in the tens of thousands. So we have a way of knowing the manipulation
20.11.2025 16:18 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0i'd pay to see him try
20.11.2025 03:29 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Either it’s a violation of the GJ Clause or that Clause doesn’t mean much
19.11.2025 22:20 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Did they not publish the report in the prior Trump admin’s long shutdown? I thought they did…?
19.11.2025 20:26 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0With rumors that DOJ is scrubbing/doctoring files, remember that they spent a ton of FBI man-hours to look through the files for Trump.
The Epstein emails had a shit ton of “Trump” hits
If whatever they release does not have thousands of references to Trump, we are being lied to
I think of anyone, bc the Senate passed with unanimous consent?!
18.11.2025 22:42 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
