Hedgehog's Avatar

Hedgehog

@fplhedgehog.bsky.social

Love the FPL, love the Arsenal. 5 x top 1.5k finishes and they were all luck.

1,598 Followers  |  455 Following  |  1,265 Posts  |  Joined: 13.11.2024
Posts Following

Posts by Hedgehog (@fplhedgehog.bsky.social)

Probably πŸ˜‚ but history has shown us that teams will do whatever they can within the rules to get an edge. Look at City’s rotational tactical fouling they’ve got away with for years for example.

03.03.2026 13:56 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yep - people don’t realise what they’re asking for

You can’t stop what we’re doing unless you completely nerf set pieces by e.g having a completely different physical threshold for attacking vs defending

03.03.2026 13:54 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yep, they should do that. And then you can’t defend set pieces in the same way - what do you think happens next?

03.03.2026 13:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This feels like something which sounds good in theory but would be a horrendous shit show in practice

02.03.2026 20:40 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think City’s decade-old β€œinnovation” with tactical fouling has been far more ruinous to the enjoyment of watching football than us being good at set pieces.

I don’t recall the rules book-changing outcry we have gotten over something actually against the rules/spirit of the game.

It’s weird.

02.03.2026 14:07 β€” πŸ‘ 83    πŸ” 11    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 3

You are going to get games that suck ass regardless unfortunately - they just turn into 0-0 games instead.

02.03.2026 14:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Counterpoint - Villa are actually shite and have been riding the wave all season to this point

02.03.2026 08:53 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Two isn’t it!

01.03.2026 20:21 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

He was β€˜walking by the studio’ and they pulled him in πŸ™„

01.03.2026 20:12 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah I guess the point (as a response to your original point) is that the offensive fouling is a response to defensive fouling - if you remove both you still get a hell of a lot of set piece goals, maybe even more.

01.03.2026 20:10 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

As I said though if you can’t defend on the edge physically it’s another advantage to the attacking team so you just see more set piece goals as a result.

The defending team benefits disproportionately from the reluctance to call fouls, imo

01.03.2026 19:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This works both ways though - if you start calling the offensive fouls you also call the defensive ones and we end up with a lot of penalties, or people stop defending physically and we have a bunch more set piece goals.

Pick your poison

01.03.2026 19:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Remarkable that Chelsea’s recruitment team spent so much money on the collectively the most braindead group of players known to man.

01.03.2026 18:30 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

West Ham were more than competitive yesterday despite the scoreline

I think they have it in them to put something together. Forest I’m not so sure.

01.03.2026 14:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Please let it happen

01.03.2026 14:39 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If you think about it, the title is β€˜functionally’ over because City will definitely win every game

01.03.2026 14:35 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

He is strong and a good finisher but his technical level is not there imo.

He’s being vastly overrated at present because the goals are going in.

28.02.2026 21:57 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I mean it obviously depends how it happens

If city win every game from here on out then there’s no shame imo

If they let city win it with less than 80 points there is some shame

28.02.2026 19:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think carrying on as we do like almost all are welcome to compete because sport builds bridges, brings people together etc etc is a form of sportswashing in all honesty.

11.02.2026 07:42 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The same reason Nottingham Forest were third around this time last year

28.02.2026 00:11 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Looks to me like Wolves very much still give a fuck

27.02.2026 21:57 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ˜‚ thanks, hopefully won’t end up in a battle to even be in the competition

27.02.2026 17:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Forget it - not interested in engaging any more, enjoy your weekend πŸ‘

27.02.2026 16:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I’d be 99%+ confident they won’t move Chelsea

27.02.2026 16:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Christ the dishonesty and deflection here is really disappointing tbh

I expected better.

27.02.2026 16:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

We’re busting out β€˜arch rivals’ now πŸ˜‚

You can’t seriously tell me the two finalists in those seasons had even close to equivalent runs. Come on now.

27.02.2026 16:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

And because Chelsea are already playing there despite being in the same situation

27.02.2026 16:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

They might make an exception to avoid clashing broadcast slots and given it’ll be 71 hours 45 minutes

27.02.2026 16:37 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

It can’t because Chelsea play their second leg Tuesday same as us

I think that’ll be the way too - avoid the Sky/TNT clash

27.02.2026 16:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

We would be at home before the City game FWIW

27.02.2026 16:29 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0