Probably π but history has shown us that teams will do whatever they can within the rules to get an edge. Look at Cityβs rotational tactical fouling theyβve got away with for years for example.
03.03.2026 13:56 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Probably π but history has shown us that teams will do whatever they can within the rules to get an edge. Look at Cityβs rotational tactical fouling theyβve got away with for years for example.
03.03.2026 13:56 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Yep - people donβt realise what theyβre asking for
You canβt stop what weβre doing unless you completely nerf set pieces by e.g having a completely different physical threshold for attacking vs defending
Yep, they should do that. And then you canβt defend set pieces in the same way - what do you think happens next?
03.03.2026 13:50 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This feels like something which sounds good in theory but would be a horrendous shit show in practice
02.03.2026 20:40 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
I think Cityβs decade-old βinnovationβ with tactical fouling has been far more ruinous to the enjoyment of watching football than us being good at set pieces.
I donβt recall the rules book-changing outcry we have gotten over something actually against the rules/spirit of the game.
Itβs weird.
You are going to get games that suck ass regardless unfortunately - they just turn into 0-0 games instead.
02.03.2026 14:42 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Counterpoint - Villa are actually shite and have been riding the wave all season to this point
02.03.2026 08:53 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Two isnβt it!
01.03.2026 20:21 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0He was βwalking by the studioβ and they pulled him in π
01.03.2026 20:12 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Yeah I guess the point (as a response to your original point) is that the offensive fouling is a response to defensive fouling - if you remove both you still get a hell of a lot of set piece goals, maybe even more.
01.03.2026 20:10 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
As I said though if you canβt defend on the edge physically itβs another advantage to the attacking team so you just see more set piece goals as a result.
The defending team benefits disproportionately from the reluctance to call fouls, imo
This works both ways though - if you start calling the offensive fouls you also call the defensive ones and we end up with a lot of penalties, or people stop defending physically and we have a bunch more set piece goals.
Pick your poison
Remarkable that Chelseaβs recruitment team spent so much money on the collectively the most braindead group of players known to man.
01.03.2026 18:30 β π 10 π 3 π¬ 0 π 1
West Ham were more than competitive yesterday despite the scoreline
I think they have it in them to put something together. Forest Iβm not so sure.
Please let it happen
01.03.2026 14:39 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0If you think about it, the title is βfunctionallyβ over because City will definitely win every game
01.03.2026 14:35 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
He is strong and a good finisher but his technical level is not there imo.
Heβs being vastly overrated at present because the goals are going in.
I mean it obviously depends how it happens
If city win every game from here on out then thereβs no shame imo
If they let city win it with less than 80 points there is some shame
I think carrying on as we do like almost all are welcome to compete because sport builds bridges, brings people together etc etc is a form of sportswashing in all honesty.
11.02.2026 07:42 β π 13 π 4 π¬ 1 π 0The same reason Nottingham Forest were third around this time last year
28.02.2026 00:11 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Looks to me like Wolves very much still give a fuck
27.02.2026 21:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0π thanks, hopefully wonβt end up in a battle to even be in the competition
27.02.2026 17:09 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Forget it - not interested in engaging any more, enjoy your weekend π
27.02.2026 16:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Iβd be 99%+ confident they wonβt move Chelsea
27.02.2026 16:48 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Christ the dishonesty and deflection here is really disappointing tbh
I expected better.
Weβre busting out βarch rivalsβ now π
You canβt seriously tell me the two finalists in those seasons had even close to equivalent runs. Come on now.
And because Chelsea are already playing there despite being in the same situation
27.02.2026 16:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0They might make an exception to avoid clashing broadcast slots and given itβll be 71 hours 45 minutes
27.02.2026 16:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 3 π 0
It canβt because Chelsea play their second leg Tuesday same as us
I think thatβll be the way too - avoid the Sky/TNT clash
We would be at home before the City game FWIW
27.02.2026 16:29 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0