π
05.03.2026 23:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@drjeffreyb.bsky.social
Health policy wonk obsessed with biostats, healthcare econ & what the data actually say | Trekkie who believes regression analysis > hot takes| Mets & Jets fan (professionally optimistic) | sic labitur Γ¦tas
π
05.03.2026 23:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0You're forgetting the new role: "Envoy for the Shields of America".......π³
05.03.2026 23:30 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Never argue with Jack Wilkerson. We all deciphered his meaning while barely noticing the lack of concordance (ok, you did).
You should hear how I muck up the tenses in French. Now THAT interferes with communication. π³
Meh.π«€
As my old grammar buddy (RIP) and language professor Jack Wilkerson argued: if native speakers use it, it's acceptable and fine. I used to tease him about the 'correct' meaning of decimated and he rightly scoffed. π«
He dubbed himself the irascible old man. π
π«
04.03.2026 22:44 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Your family and friends ok? π
04.03.2026 04:14 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
π
Totally!
"Does it work?" vs. "how much does it work?" aren't always separable. In resource allocation or intervention comparisons, even a wide credible interval on effect size beats a binary. Demanding precision is bad; ignoring imprecise estimates in decisions that need them is also bad, don't you think? π€
04.03.2026 03:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The healthcare INDUSTRY spends more on lobbying Congress than any other sector in America. Furthermore, there is NOT one silver bullet, one shift that "fixes" this. "Medicare for All" is jingoism. The solution isn't just slapping tape on something that exists because it's putatively easy.
04.03.2026 03:18 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Hillary Clinton is one of the sharpest politicians in the Democratic party. Huge missed opportunity there.
04.03.2026 03:09 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Not yet, but give it time. Give it time.
04.03.2026 02:45 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The fact that we frame alternatives adopted from other countries as radical says more about our political imagination than the policy itself. I'm not suggesting a pivot is easy: it's NOT. So many entrenched interests; so many lives jeopardized.
04.03.2026 02:42 β π 10 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0The hardest part of what you're describing is that the people inside the system like you can see the structural collapse happening in real time while the public debate stays ten levels of abstraction away from the actual problem.
04.03.2026 02:42 β π 5 π 1 π¬ 2 π 0He's right of course. Employer-linked benefits aren't natural law but a WWII wage-control workaround we never bothered to fix. It's also why Americans are afraid to start businesses or leave bad jobs. We've chained risk-taking to a paycheck.
04.03.2026 02:42 β π 177 π 53 π¬ 1 π 24/6 today.
03.03.2026 06:02 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 03/6
02.03.2026 19:58 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
A sign of emotional intelligence is the ability to laugh at yourself. "...displaying amusement (vs. embarrassment) is
perceived to be a more emotionally calibrated response to many
common faux pas." Life skill: chill.
Food is not a reward for hard work.
#medsky
Hey @econmaett.github.io if you're on LinkedIn, connect w/me (at your own risk of course). π
02.03.2026 07:41 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0This sentiment from Captain Picard on "time" is worth a rewatch. #startrek #TNG
02.03.2026 07:10 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0In fairness Bush started no war. He stopped Sadam's aggression in Kuwait and mobilized an extraordinary coalition of nations. I had my issues but this was leadership.
02.03.2026 03:27 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The answer from none other than Captain Picard.
02.03.2026 03:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1The Pod Bros keep platforming this eejit. Gross and illuminating.
02.03.2026 03:10 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
π―
This may also be LinkedIn worthy!!
π
So immunity as the dominant driver isn't just plausible, it's the parsimonious call. Makes sense to me!
In laymen's terms: the math tells you that something is slowing the virus but doesn't tell you WHAT.
02.03.2026 00:06 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0The main caveat is that Rt near 1 could also reflect behavioral changes or other non-immunological factors suppressing transmission, so attribution to immunity usually requires triangulating with seroprevalence data or other direct measures.
02.03.2026 00:06 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0These are easy concepts to conflate. Reinfection reflects partial immunity, not absence of immunity. Wastewater measures incidence trends, not population susceptibility. Rt near 1 with a high R0 implies reduced population susceptibility, even if infections continue.
02.03.2026 00:04 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Pod Bros platform him. Vile
01.03.2026 23:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0