Jeffrey B. Benyacar's Avatar

Jeffrey B. Benyacar

@drjeffreyb.bsky.social

Health policy wonk obsessed with biostats, healthcare econ & what the data actually say | Trekkie who believes regression analysis > hot takes| Mets & Jets fan (professionally optimistic) | sic labitur Γ¦tas

1,200 Followers  |  617 Following  |  2,093 Posts  |  Joined: 26.05.2024
Posts Following

Posts by Jeffrey B. Benyacar (@drjeffreyb.bsky.social)

πŸ‘€

05.03.2026 23:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You're forgetting the new role: "Envoy for the Shields of America".......😳

05.03.2026 23:30 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Never argue with Jack Wilkerson. We all deciphered his meaning while barely noticing the lack of concordance (ok, you did).

You should hear how I muck up the tenses in French. Now THAT interferes with communication. 😳

04.03.2026 23:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Meh.🫀

As my old grammar buddy (RIP) and language professor Jack Wilkerson argued: if native speakers use it, it's acceptable and fine. I used to tease him about the 'correct' meaning of decimated and he rightly scoffed. 🫠

He dubbed himself the irascible old man. πŸ‘€

04.03.2026 23:24 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
an angry yellow smiley face with a pair of white shoes on its feet ALT: an angry yellow smiley face with a pair of white shoes on its feet

NO.
Just the beginning....just the beginning.

04.03.2026 22:48 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

🫠

04.03.2026 22:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Your family and friends ok? πŸ™

04.03.2026 04:14 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ‘

Totally!

04.03.2026 03:45 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"Does it work?" vs. "how much does it work?" aren't always separable. In resource allocation or intervention comparisons, even a wide credible interval on effect size beats a binary. Demanding precision is bad; ignoring imprecise estimates in decisions that need them is also bad, don't you think? πŸ€”

04.03.2026 03:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Pharma industry and Ballard Partners dominate the lobbying space in second quarter of 2025 - OpenSecrets News Pharmaceutical and health products companies continued to dominate the lobbying space in the second quarter of 2025, spending $105.4 million…

The healthcare INDUSTRY spends more on lobbying Congress than any other sector in America. Furthermore, there is NOT one silver bullet, one shift that "fixes" this. "Medicare for All" is jingoism. The solution isn't just slapping tape on something that exists because it's putatively easy.

04.03.2026 03:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hillary Clinton is one of the sharpest politicians in the Democratic party. Huge missed opportunity there.

04.03.2026 03:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Not yet, but give it time. Give it time.

04.03.2026 02:45 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The fact that we frame alternatives adopted from other countries as radical says more about our political imagination than the policy itself. I'm not suggesting a pivot is easy: it's NOT. So many entrenched interests; so many lives jeopardized.

04.03.2026 02:42 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The hardest part of what you're describing is that the people inside the system like you can see the structural collapse happening in real time while the public debate stays ten levels of abstraction away from the actual problem.

04.03.2026 02:42 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

He's right of course. Employer-linked benefits aren't natural law but a WWII wage-control workaround we never bothered to fix. It's also why Americans are afraid to start businesses or leave bad jobs. We've chained risk-taking to a paycheck.

04.03.2026 02:42 β€” πŸ‘ 177    πŸ” 53    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 2

4/6 today.

03.03.2026 06:02 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

3/6

02.03.2026 19:58 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

A sign of emotional intelligence is the ability to laugh at yourself. "...displaying amusement (vs. embarrassment) is
perceived to be a more emotionally calibrated response to many
common faux pas." Life skill: chill.

02.03.2026 09:17 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Food is not a reward for hard work.
#medsky

02.03.2026 08:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hey @econmaett.github.io if you're on LinkedIn, connect w/me (at your own risk of course). πŸ˜‰

02.03.2026 07:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This sentiment from Captain Picard on "time" is worth a rewatch. #startrek #TNG

02.03.2026 07:10 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

In fairness Bush started no war. He stopped Sadam's aggression in Kuwait and mobilized an extraordinary coalition of nations. I had my issues but this was leadership.

02.03.2026 03:27 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Star Trek Generations 1994 One of Many Favorite Quotes
YouTube video by Tom Nouri Star Trek Generations 1994 One of Many Favorite Quotes

The answer from none other than Captain Picard.

02.03.2026 03:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 1

The Pod Bros keep platforming this eejit. Gross and illuminating.

02.03.2026 03:10 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ’―

This may also be LinkedIn worthy!!

02.03.2026 03:07 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ‘

So immunity as the dominant driver isn't just plausible, it's the parsimonious call. Makes sense to me!

02.03.2026 00:31 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

In laymen's terms: the math tells you that something is slowing the virus but doesn't tell you WHAT.

02.03.2026 00:06 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

The main caveat is that Rt near 1 could also reflect behavioral changes or other non-immunological factors suppressing transmission, so attribution to immunity usually requires triangulating with seroprevalence data or other direct measures.

02.03.2026 00:06 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

These are easy concepts to conflate. Reinfection reflects partial immunity, not absence of immunity. Wastewater measures incidence trends, not population susceptibility. Rt near 1 with a high R0 implies reduced population susceptibility, even if infections continue.

02.03.2026 00:04 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Pod Bros platform him. Vile

01.03.2026 23:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0