I assumed you were just delivering on the promise of more surrealism.
05.03.2026 18:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I assumed you were just delivering on the promise of more surrealism.
05.03.2026 18:46 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I initially shared this, not knowing it was a Claude screenshot (because, having never used Claude, I didn’t know what Claude screenshots looked like), and since I’d seen similar claims in other sources I assumed this was journalism. But I should have checked it before sharing. Apologies, all.
05.03.2026 15:29 — 👍 399 🔁 51 💬 8 📌 6Sorry I'm not more open-minded about LLMs, it's just some fucking maniacs shoveled out a bunch of useless bloatware featuring that technology, did not give me any chance to opt out, reorganized the entire economy around it, zeroed out gains made by green energy, and made it impossible to buy RAM
05.03.2026 05:17 — 👍 13560 🔁 4251 💬 110 📌 85
"when the truth becomes obvious people will update their priors"
No! They won't! Have you spent any time on this website!
I want to go to a time when things are dummy simple to use, work well for a long time, and are easily able to be fixed by the user with replacement parts that don't cost a lot.
04.03.2026 20:34 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
The first rule of science club is:
TELL EVERYONE ABOUT SCIENCE CLUB! There's safety in numbers.
Mostly the Germans.
03.03.2026 17:22 — 👍 20 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Have you tried living well and being happy?
03.03.2026 05:45 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Woodworking. Knitting. Baking. Model Trains. Warhammer. Leather working. Minecraft. Kirby's Dreamland.
01.03.2026 18:37 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0That's already available. X, the everything app!
01.03.2026 04:46 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Thunderbird doesn't give me this issue, no. Now for mobile as well!
28.02.2026 03:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
*Sam Altman reading a book. Title not visible*
"Wait a minute. I think this Torment Nexus thing that we're designing our product to be like might be bad.
.
.
For the shareholders"
Okay, he was cancelled and absolutely deserved it, but calling him "untalented" is just over the top here. DGHDA was compelling, entertaining, and absolutely what Adams would've wanted for the character. It was so much fun, and I can't pretend Landis being an awful person changed any of that.
27.02.2026 21:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Oh, that's a Hank Green. Or a @zachweinersmith.bsky.social. or a @xkcd.com. Sometimes, even a @vsauce.bsky.social or a @veritasium.bsky.social.
27.02.2026 21:10 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0rip dan simmons arstechnica.com/culture/2026...
27.02.2026 18:59 — 👍 417 🔁 103 💬 23 📌 63Still better than the SkiFree snowman.
27.02.2026 16:15 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Chat, is it bad when one tech dude having a modicum of a conscience is the only thing hindering the plans of the worst people in the world to use hallucinatory robots to automate crimes against humanity?
27.02.2026 15:28 — 👍 1982 🔁 432 💬 6 📌 16It is wild how different the opinions of the people who like it are. Right up there with Starship Troopers.
27.02.2026 16:07 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
What I got from Terminator 2 was that Miles Dyson isn't our problem. I wanted to say Stephen Falken from WarGames is, but if I'm going there, it's really John McKittrick.
Just like in 2001, HAL came to a logical conclusion, given its inputs, and it was people like McKittrick who provided them.
Nothing's stopping you from making an alt :)
26.02.2026 18:45 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The Batman symbol?
I'm going to assume this was so you didn't get sued. :D
26.02.2026 14:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Good job on not smoking.
25.02.2026 22:13 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0That's not my name.
25.02.2026 18:18 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I assumed you burn hatemail for the warmth.
25.02.2026 16:51 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Real missed opportunity for the comic after it.
24.02.2026 16:31 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0A nearly 4:1 ratio, and that's after including the two net negative movies. Wild.
24.02.2026 14:36 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0