Matthew Kleinman's Avatar

Matthew Kleinman

@mattkleinman.bsky.social

Star Trek fan of all Star Trek, Avid player of Star Trek Online.

46 Followers  |  145 Following  |  31 Posts  |  Joined: 06.11.2024  |  2.1691

Latest posts by mattkleinman.bsky.social on Bluesky

In the PAST that was the case. We're dealing with a different group now & they seem to want to do things a different way.

03.03.2025 21:58 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Typically, they NEVER released the Anniversary bundle ON the anniversary.

We usually get the anniversary in the past on or near the actual date & like a week or two later, they start teasing it out, usually with the full details a few days before the actual release.

03.03.2025 18:29 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I think it's all been delayed because of some internal issues that had been going on. I mean, we didn't get the anniversary ON the anniversary, so I think the usual time tables are delayed for sure.

03.03.2025 18:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Bill Krause, the designer of the Shangri La class had been teasing some thing is happening with it. Considering that it is legit in Star Trek as a true ship, it's possibly ANOTHER ship in the pack since the pack is TMP era focused.

03.03.2025 18:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

We sort of know already what a couple of other ships are due to some slipups or outside teases by other people.

Consoles had recently a slipup where the Pioneer class suddenly had two variants that could be seen in the store: a TMP era visual & an Exeter like visual, which suggests a T6 version.

03.03.2025 18:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I wish I had known about this BEFORE I bought it.

28.02.2025 05:59 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Knowing that we COULD get an account on here for STO would be awesome for the people on the STO subreddit that have decided to block X due to who owns it.

Anything honestly helps for communication with the playerbase!

10.02.2025 21:07 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

It's been a few days since the STAR TREK SECTION 31 premiere, so let me tell you about the coolest Easter egg I snuck into the movie. πŸ‘‡

29.01.2025 22:49 β€” πŸ‘ 29    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

What are you referring to by "our timeline was the bad one?"

29.01.2025 02:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Personally, I'm interested in seeing what the Stargazer comes out to be for the remaster.

23.01.2025 07:38 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I'll save you the trouble.

- Shi Kahr & Centaur: T1 Miranda Light Cruiser
- Excalibur, Vesper & Exeter: T2 Connie Cruiser
- Rapier: T2 Saber Escort
- Aurora & Quasar: T2 Nova Science Vessel
- Hope & Horizon: T3 Olympic Research Science Vessel.

The Tier 3 Heavy Cruiser line would be next.

23.01.2025 06:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I wonder though what style they'll take the stargazer. Given that it was said to have launched after the Dominion War, I could see them doing a sovereign influence on it, at least on the hull. I'm not sure though on the nacelles.

23.01.2025 05:28 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes, but they're doing the remasters in a Tier order.

We just got the Hope remaster, which finishes off the Olympic Research Science Vessel lineage of ships, which is a Tier 3 ship.

It's going to be a while until they get to the Prometheus line of ship remasters.

23.01.2025 05:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Look, spoiling #STO shit for you guys is one of my few remaining joys in this cruel world, so I will just say we're about to start intake on another remaster that I think will surprise and delight the four-nacelle gang.

23.01.2025 02:21 β€” πŸ‘ 186    πŸ” 17    πŸ’¬ 35    πŸ“Œ 2

Why not it be the Stargazer?

23.01.2025 03:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm not going to care if anyone wishes to tell me that I'm wrong for treating things a certain way. My opinions are my own & my POV on how I see things is just as valid as anyone else's POV, even if they disagree with me.

Here's to seeing what 2025 will bring!

01.01.2025 03:03 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

As I look back on 2024 & move into 2025 later tonight, I want to say that moving forward, I am going to endeavor to stand my ground over what others may think of my opinions regarding certain TV shows. What matters to me moving forward is my OWN judgment on TV shows & movies AND anything else.

01.01.2025 03:02 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

By Axanar guy, are you referring to the guy that tried to create a studio for filming it?

28.12.2024 09:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It's hard to ignore when its going to be an ongoing thing for some time, sadly. I mean, look at what is still to come with Strange New Worlds, Starfleet Academy and Section 31.

There's also the upcoming Skydance merger too which could impact things.

27.12.2024 22:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So there has been one thing that has been on my mind lately: This ongoing debacle concerning the "Prime Timeline" with Star Trek.

Certain youtube channels out there will say that the "Prime Timeline" is different, but what in all actually DOES make it up?

27.12.2024 21:50 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Not to mention, it gives the STO devs a chance to catch up with the shows to put out new stuff from them.

20.12.2024 09:33 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Part of me is hoping that based on the way the series ended Star Trek Online can help pick up something up that might follow up on the multiversal story arc that they are currently running with. Just my personal wish of course!

20.12.2024 06:00 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

So it's a bittersweet moment for me after watching the #StarTrekLowerDecks finale. On one hand, it was great seeing the way it ended, but with it now over, only Strange New Worlds remains out of what once was 5 running shows on Paramount+, aside from what is in production right now.

20.12.2024 05:59 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Because there are people out there that have an opinion about the season & the show that these ships appeared in. So many don't consider it to be a canon TV series, even though it actually is.

05.12.2024 00:03 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

At least next year it'll become available for Event Campaign VII's prize list.

04.12.2024 23:56 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

So was that an early version of the script that Michael Burnham was busted back down to Ensign instead of what she ended up getting?

It's nice to see what might have been if THAT was the case.

28.11.2024 23:55 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a national geographic logo can be seen in the corner of this image ALT: a national geographic logo can be seen in the corner of this image

🚨 HEY EVERYONE! 🚨

I figured we can have some fun as I get settled over here… so let’s do it!

I’ve got some cool signed stuff from the amazing projects I’ve worked on. STAR TREK, TROLLHUNTERS, more.

Follow me and give this a repost/comment below. I’ll pick a winner at random from the comments!

15.11.2024 17:45 β€” πŸ‘ 367    πŸ” 194    πŸ’¬ 216    πŸ“Œ 19

I take it the reason you address that is because some people might STILL have foundry missions in their mission tracker that utilize those doors so you want to get those fixed up?

16.11.2024 00:36 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It's good to get clarification on things.

This of course now brings STO a bit closer to the prime timeline while still being its own offshoot, which is what I think STO still is, correct?

15.11.2024 23:19 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I guess the talk of them NOT changing Earth Spacedock to that of Picard's one was either backtracked or maybe this was DECA's push to do it.

I wonder if that means there's other changes possibly on the horizon for the game.

15.11.2024 22:49 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@mattkleinman is following 20 prominent accounts