The Perpetually Mystifying J3zz

"Corporate wants you to find the difference."

Left picture: Gender nonconformity hatred, right picture: transphobia

"They are the same picture."

Cis people never show the slightest love to effeminate men or butch women, except when someone wants to transition, and then suddenly they just love them.

Transphobes like to create the narrative that we're dangerous & scary but his behavior os clearly not the acts of a person who's afraid but of someone who knows they are being fearsome. I suspect he relishes in being so public in stalking a woman online & even getting celebrated as a women defender.

She answered it already in her post, he seemingly uses burner accounts. Likely just opens a new one, once the previous one gets blocked again.

This shit is still going on. Ben Ryan obsessively tweets about me nearly every single day. He tweets about the people and posts I repost. He does so often within seconds of me posting because his burner has push alerts for my posts. Then he deletes them weeks later to not look as unhinged.

yeah so

all of society does every single thing in its power to force trans women to do exactly this

and then punishes us for that too!

So maybe go tell cis women to just be an effeminate man instead of who they truly are

it’ll work just as well

WE ARE WHO WE ARE

It's transphobia because it's treating any potential "trans outcome" as wildly undesirable, as if human individuals must always conform to what society desires of them.

Every trans woman I know has had "why not be an effeminate man?" shoved in our faces for ages and yet thus piece suggests that even once suggesting an effeminate boy might be trans is some sort of crime against humanity.

This is transphobia.

I still want to know what exact sort of parent they think is uncomfortable having a gay child but totally fine with a trans one

Show me them

(Credit: AyvieArt)

Wait until they find out you can be trans AND an effeminate gay boy

The trans panic is soon going to be older that the "invention" of trans people...

In the last decade, the Atlantic has not platformed a single trans person to speak about issues affecting them or the broader trans community. Not a single one. Yet, they have monthly screeds by Helen Lewis and endless money to pay random transphobic grifters to pump stuff like this out.

You get stuff like this because narratives about trans lives are given an undue degree of attention, without the participation of actual trans people, trans experiences, trans narratives.

The idea that no trans woman has ever been told she's just an effeminate man is absurd, but it's a byline now.

THE BIGGER PICTURE BEN APPEL Genspect NOVEMBER 4-5, 2023 DENVER, USA Ben Appel is a writer living in New York. His memoir, "Cis White Gay: The Making of a Gender Heretic," with Bombardier Books, is forthcoming. His work has appeared in Newsweek, Spiked, Daily Mail, Washington Examiner, Queer Majority, and UnHerd. Follow him on X @benappel.

From a Genspect article... We all agree that autogynephilia is a paraphilia that can cause dreadful harm to women. How to tackle this issue is where the conflict lies. Some people believe that all AGP men should never be allowed to speak; nor should they be allowed to show their face in public; indeed, according to many, there is no space where AGP men should ever be allowed to exist. Put simply, some people believe that they should either hide themselves for ever more or they should die.

Ben has done quite a bit of work with Genspect, and he was a panelist at their conference in Denver in 2023.
That’s this conference👇that afterwards the Genspect board had to write an article wherein they stated that their members wanting to kill trans people was going too far.

This shit always seems to assume that we're too stupid to know the difference between being mannish or feminine & being a man or a woman. I mean I know lots of cis people think we're stupid as fuck if only for "wanting to live like this" or "not knowing biology" but come on!

A screenshot of an article header from The Atlantic's "Ideas" section. The title reads "IN DEFENSE OF EFFEMINATE GAY BOYS" in large, serif capital letters. Below it, a subheader in a smaller font says, "If anyone had suggested that I might really be a girl, I don’t know how I would have responded." The byline at the bottom identifies the author as Ben Appel.

Babe, wake up. The Atlantic is doing the "they're transing the gays" conspiracy theory.

It's depressing to discover how old all these tropes all are & how the same queerphobes now act to love the cis gays to divide us after having & still conflating us since forever.

In Defense of Effeminate Boys If anyone had suggested that I might really be a girl, I don’t know how I would have responded. By Ben Appel

No one before Ben has ever considered that trans women might actually be effeminate gay boys. No one has ever suggested such a thing to us, repeatedly, in a bid to prevent us from transitioning, or developed entire typologies around the idea, or reinforced it in multiple academic fields!

Honestly the idea that "you couldn't tell" has been a fear of cis men for millennia. We have writings from antiquity lamenting that you couldn't tell these "men from women". Passing has been a cis fascination forever. "Can always tell" is more of a modern cope in response to this fear in my opinion.

An idea the masculinist gay men obviously always hated & also like today jumped to the conclusion that only they were real & a "female-brained couldn't exist or should rein at least their behavior in to be more respectable.

After the scientifc "invention" of homosexuality there were also soon masculinist gay men who thought that "mannish" lesbians & femme gay men (some who also possibly were straight trans women) gave them a bad name & that the latter "performed" it because of the idea that gay men had "female brains".

They tended to believe that people became gay due to having been groomed & abused by gay men as minors. Or that people became gay out of boredom, especially due to sexual excess. They generally still believed feminine men were automatically gay. It never ever made any sense or had any consistency.

Really reminds me of all the antisemites now pretending to be philosemites only to support murdering Muslims & cradle gullible Jews in false security.

They barely modified the trope, they merely pretend that instead of stopping dastardly gay men from becoming women to trick het men, they are now saving poor gay men "seduced by gender ideology". Like everyhthing transphobes rely on are cheap 40+ years old stereotypes, despite us "being a new thing"

That argument maybe made sense decades ago when gay people could have assumed that simply becoming a hetero of the other sex was easier to exist as but gay people have been far more accepted than us for a long time now. But no one cares since GC stupidity fits right into the current imbecilic world.

right. it's also projection.

they want to convert trans women in to gay cis men and trans men in to gay cis women.

it's literally projection on their part.

It’s also just an extension of the “gays have to recruit because they can’t reproduce” trope. It’s nakedly homophobic rhetoric repeated with an anti trans bent. They’re just constantly recycling old bigotry.

i feel strongly that anyone that thinks that there is a nefarious cabal of surgeons and doctors Transing people should be forced to try and schedule one (1) transsexual procedure

Reminder that V-coding is a majority experience for trans women in prison *in California*! It probably isn't better in Kansas!