FoxNewsDeprogrammer

Since becoming President how much has Trump raised the membership fee for Mar-A-Lago? Mar-a-Lago Membership Fee History Since Trump's Presidency Donald Trump's first term as President began on January 20, 2017. At that time, the initiation fee for new members at Mar-a-Lago (his private club in Palm Beach, Florida) was $200,000, following a doubling from $100,000 in early 2017 amid heightened interest after his election. This marked the starting point for fees during his presidency. Since then, the fee has increased multiple times due to the club's exclusivity (capped at 500 members) and perceived value in providing access to Trump. Here's a timeline of known changes based on reporting: | Year | Initiation Fee | Change | Notes | |------|----------------|--------|-------| | 2017 (start of presidency) | $200,000 | +$100,000 (from $100,000 pre-inauguration) | Doubled shortly after inauguration; annual dues ~$14,000–$20,000. | | ~2023–Early 2024 | $700,000 | +$500,000 (cumulative from 2017) | More than tripled from 2017 levels; exact timing unclear but reported as current before mid-2024 hike. | | October 2024 | $1,000,000 | +$300,000 (from $700,000) | Announced in July 2024 for four new spots; timed ahead of the election. | Total Increase From January 2017 ($200,000) to current (November 2025, $1,000,000): The initiation fee has risen by $800,000, a 400% increase. Annual dues have remained relatively stable at around $15,000–$20,000 (plus tax), with no major reported hikes tied to Trump's presidency. These increases have sparked ethics concerns about potential pay-to-play access to Trump, especially during his terms, as members have included donors and appointees. Fees are for initiation only; membership requires approval and is highly selective.

x.com/i/grok/share...

☝️☝️☝️

Health insurance costs jumped for workers & employers in 2025.

This will get worse if the GOP refuses to extend ACA subsidies.

Meanwhile, the seven largest health insurance companies made a combined $71B in profits in 2024.

Still not sure we need Medicare for All?

The 400 richest Americans are now worth a record $6.6 trillion.

The entire bottom 50% of America is worth just $4.2 trillion.

Read that back.

When 400 people control more wealth than half a country’s population, we have a very serious problem.

Great question

Has the major news networks reported on the explosion of the judge’s house? Yes, major U.S. news networks have reported on the October 4, 2025, fire—described by South Carolina Chief Justice John Kittredge as stemming from an "apparent explosion"—that destroyed the Edisto Beach home of Circuit Court Judge Diane Goodstein, injuring three family members (including her husband, former state Sen. Arnold Goodstein, who suffered fractures after jumping from a window). The South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) is investigating potential arson amid reports of recent death threats against Goodstein, who had ruled against the Trump administration's request for voter data access in September 2025. CNN, ABC News, and NBC News have covered the incident, often citing local affiliates like WCSC (Charleston) and WIS (Columbia). Fox News, MSNBC, and CBS News do not appear to have published dedicated stories as of October 6, though the event has drawn national attention due to its timing and political context. CNN: Reported on the blaze engulfing Goodstein's home, noting SLED's involvement and the judge's absence (she was walking on the beach). ABC News: Aired video coverage of the "beach house fire investigation" at a property believed to be owned by a judge, highlighting multiple injuries. NBC News: Affiliates WCBD and WCSC detailed the fire's impact on a home associated with Goodstein, including evacuations and the explosion's role in starting the blaze.

@morningjoe-msnbc.bsky.social Waiting to hear something…. x.com/i/grok/share...

(1,2) Gun violence affects all of us. Decent and important Americans are getting shot and killed every day. Bullets don't care if you are Republican or Democrat. If people who love Charlie Kirk want to honor him, they should join me to pass The Charlie Kirk Jaime Guttenberg Gun Safety Act.

United States would certainly be better off.

Billionaire Trump donor Elon Musk owns X.

Billionaire Trump ally Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post.

With this acquisition, both CNN and CBS News would be owned by billionaire Trump donor Larry Ellison.

Oligarchs’ monopoly over our media is spiraling out of control.

Why does Elon Musk spew propaganda? Elon Musk, as the owner of X (formerly Twitter) and a prolific poster with over 200 million followers, has been widely criticized for amplifying misleading or false information, particularly on topics like elections, immigration, COVID-19, and geopolitical issues. While the term "propaganda" implies deliberate manipulation for ideological or self-serving ends, analyses from journalists, researchers, and fact-checkers suggest several interconnected reasons for his behavior, based on patterns observed since his 2022 acquisition of the platform. These aren't excuses but explanations drawn from public records, studies, and his own statements. I'll break it down step by step, focusing on evidence-based motivations rather than unsubstantiated speculation. 1. Alignment with Right-Wing Ideology and Political Ambitions Musk has increasingly positioned himself as a critic of "woke" culture, progressive policies, and what he calls "legacy media propaganda." This shift accelerated around 2022, coinciding with his purchase of Twitter, which he framed as a defense of free speech but has since been used to boost conservative narratives. For instance: He has endorsed Donald Trump and spent over $118 million on a pro-Trump super PAC in the 2024 U.S. election cycle, promoting claims of election fraud and anti-immigrant conspiracies that align with MAGA talking points. Studies, such as one from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, show a "staggering" increase in his interactions with right-wing accounts known for disinformation, including pro-Trump pages and conspiracy sites like ZeroHedge. This suggests a deliberate effort to legitimize far-right views, possibly to gain influence in a potential Trump administration or to counter perceived left-leaning biases in tech and media. On X, Musk has amplified content from accounts like "Libs of TikTok" (anti-LGBTQ) and "Catturd" (pro-Trump memes), helping them grow while attacking opponents like USAID or UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer with unverified claims. Critics argue this is less about truth and more about advancing an anti-progressive agenda, as he has called Wikipedia "legacy media propaganda" after edits to his own page. In essence, Musk appears to "spew" such content to build political capital, potentially securing favorable policies like deregulation for Tesla and SpaceX. 2. Business Interests and Financial Incentives Musk's companies rely heavily on government contracts, subsidies, and public perception, and his posts often serve to protect or hype these ventures: Tesla's stock has fluctuated based on his tweets; for example, he settled SEC fraud charges in 2018 for misleading statements about taking Tesla private. More recently, he has exaggerated timelines for products like the Cybertruck or Full Self-Driving to boost investor confidence, which some analyses describe as "habitual disregard for the truth when it suits his interests." SpaceX benefits from billions in NASA and Defense Department contracts, yet Musk has spread misinformation on Ukraine (e.g., restricting Starlink access in 2022, echoing Russian narratives) and shared Russian propaganda memes, possibly to navigate geopolitical tensions or appeal to authoritarian markets like China. An EU study found that changes to X under Musk increased the reach of Kremlin-backed accounts by 36% in 2023, aiding Russian disinformation on Ukraine. X itself has lost nearly 80% of its value since Musk's acquisition, partly due to advertiser exodus over hate speech and misinformation. By turning it into a "MAGA mouthpiece," he may be courting conservative users and revenue, even if it means tolerating bots and propaganda to inflate engagement. This pattern indicates that misleading posts help maintain hype around his empire, deterring scrutiny from regulators or competitors. 3. Platform Changes and Amplification of Disinformation Since buying X, Musk dismantled trust and safety teams, removed labels for state-affiliated media (e.g., Russian outlets like RT), and altered algorithms to favor his content and right-wing posts. This has turned X into a "disinformation machine," where his posts—often memes or unverified claims—reach billions of views: Election misinformation from Musk has garnered 1.2 billion views, far outpacing fact-checks from officials (e.g., 200 times more reach on false voter fraud claims). He promoted a QAnon-style video on Election Day 2024 and false narratives about Kamala Harris. Even his AI, Grok, has spread unverified info, like false ballot deadlines or biased summaries, due to training on X's polarized data. Five U.S. Secretaries of State urged fixes in 2024, but Musk's "anti-woke" stance prioritizes unfiltered output over accuracy. Internationally, he has inflamed UK riots with anti-migrant posts and feuded with Brazil and the EU over hate speech moderation, often siding with far-right figures. Musk has admitted some errors (e.g., "some things I say will be incorrect") but defends it as fighting "hypnosis" from mainstream media, positioning X as the true source of information. This self-reinforcing echo chamber amplifies his views, as he controls the algorithm to prioritize his content over critics. 4. Personal Traits and Psychological Factors Observers describe Musk's posting style as impulsive and attention-seeking, with over 145 tweets in a single day in 2024, often conspiratorial or extreme. He has a history of pettiness—e.g., changing X's algorithm after Biden's Super Bowl post outperformed his—and a "messianic psychopathy" in promoting alternate realities. Early examples include downplaying COVID-19 in 2020 ("close to zero new cases by end of April"), which killed over a million Americans, evolving into broader denialism. X users and analysts note his chameleon-like shifts (from Democrat to Trump ally) driven by a need for power, not principles, including ties to cheap labor in authoritarian regimes. Some speculate foreign influence (e.g., Russian ties via shared propaganda), but evidence points more to opportunism than direct control. Broader Implications and Counterpoints Musk's actions have real-world effects: increased hate speech, threats to election officials, and policy influence (e.g., his role in Trump's "Department of Government Efficiency" in 2025). However, he and supporters argue it's "free speech" against biased media, and X remains popular for its unfiltered discourse. Fact-checkers like DW and PolitiFact consistently debunk his claims, but their reach is dwarfed by his. Ultimately, while Musk may believe he's combating propaganda, the evidence shows his behavior often functions as such—driven by ideology, business, power, and platform dynamics. For a non-partisan view, cross-referencing claims with multiple sources (e.g., Reuters, AP) is key, as no single platform, including X, is immune to bias.

x.com/i/grok/share...

Is this like when Trump met with the Russians and wouldn’t allow anyone else in the room?

For some reason people can’t comment over on X 🧐

It's amusing the contrast the ENORMOUS crowds that showed up today to protest *against* Donald Trump and the paltry turnout to celebrate him tonight. How humiliating.

Maybe there is hope for the country.

x.com/segravesnbc4...

☝️☝️

You’re right it was a free country but our military would be more reluctant to fight patriotic Americans standing up for immigrants and if they did start firing on them it would really piss a lot of people off.

☝️☝️☝️

Protesters are doing it wrong. Start carrying the U.S. flag in your peaceful protests.

Good time to remember:

The last time Trump was president, he ran up more than 25% of ALL the debt in the entire history of America

$7.8 TRILLION DOLLARS

And he’s about to do it again — so he and his billionaire friends, Musk and Bezos and Zuckerberg, can get tax cuts

I was banned from posting on X for asking this same question.

Why can’t I post my freedom of speech on X? The concept of "freedom of speech" on X is complex because X is a private platform, not a public square, and thus not fully bound by First Amendment protections. Here are the main reasons you might feel restricted from posting your views on X: 1. **Content Moderation Policies**: X has rules governing what can be posted, including bans on hate speech, incitement to violence, harassment, and misinformation, as outlined in its Terms of Service. If your post violates these rules—say, by targeting a protected group or spreading false claims deemed harmful—it may be removed, or your account could face restrictions like shadowbanning or suspension. For example, posts containing racial slurs or explicit threats are often flagged. Studies suggest hate speech has risen on X since 2022, but enforcement remains inconsistent, which might explain why some posts are removed while others stay.[](https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313293)[](https://x.com/AskPerplexity/status/1922294190303568329) 2. **Algorithmic Reach Limits**: X operates under a “freedom of speech, not freedom of reach” policy, as stated by Elon Musk. This means controversial or rule-breaking posts may be de-amplified, reducing their visibility without notifying you. If your post criticizes certain figures or topics, it might be algorithmically throttled, especially if it’s flagged as misleading or offensive. Some users claim this disproportionately affects critical or dissenting voices.[](https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/11/22/elon-musk-twitter-content-moderations/)[](https://x.com/Ciralindae/status/1921039580683214985)[](https://x.com/icantwant2/status/1921219373257142727) 3. **Shadowbanning and Account Labels**: X assigns internal labels or “social credit scores” to accounts, which can limit reach without explicit bans. If your posts consistently push boundaries or receive flags, your account might be tagged, reducing visibility. Users have reported feeling shadowbanned for criticizing X’s leadership or specific political agendas, though X denies systematic bias.[](https://x.com/Ciralindae/status/1921039580683214985)[](https://x.com/AskPerplexity/status/1922294931520950385) 4. **Legal Compliance**: X complies with local laws in countries where it operates. If your post violates laws (e.g., defamation in the UK or anti-hate laws in Germany), it may be removed or geo-restricted. For instance, X has suppressed content at the request of governments like Turkey and India, despite its free speech stance.[](https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/4/24235213/x-brazil-suppression-speech-elon-musk-india-turkey) 5. **Technical or User Error**: Sometimes, inability to post stems from glitches, account restrictions (e.g., for suspected spam), or failure to verify your account. If you’re seeing no engagement, it could be due to low follower count, lack of paid verification (which boosts reach), or being muted/blocked by others.[](https://x.com/memetheleft/status/1923191123092136121) 6. **Self-Censorship or Chilling Effect**: The platform’s environment, where controversial posts can attract harassment or algorithmic penalties, might lead you to self-censor. Some users avoid posting due to fear of backlash or reduced visibility, which can feel like a restriction on free expression.[](https://trinitytripod.com/opinion/elon-musks-new-x-algorithm-is-harming-our-free-speech/) **Why This Happens**: X, as a private company, balances its free speech rhetoric with business interests (advertiser pressure, user retention) and legal obligations. Unlike the First Amendment, which only restricts government censorship, X can legally moderate content as it sees fit, protected by its own First Amendment rights and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This means it can remove or limit posts without violating your constitutional rights.[](https://www.accessiblelaw.untdallas.edu/post/the-limits-of-free-speech-in-social-media)[](https://www.talksonlaw.com/briefs/does-the-first-amendment-require-social-media-platforms-to-grant-access-to-all-users) **What You Can Do**: - Check X’s rules and appeal if your post was removed unfairly. - Verify your account or consider a paid subscription for better reach. - Post on alternative platforms like Threads or Mastodon if you feel X is too restrictive. - Frame your views carefully to avoid triggering moderation (e.g., avoid explicit language). If you’re facing a specific issue (e.g., an error message or suspension), share more details, and I can help troubleshoot. What exactly are you trying to post, and what’s happening when you try?

If you challenge their accusations against Comey they will ban you from posting on X. x.com/i/grok/share...

My buddy Michael Fanone has an idea for Rep. Mike Johnson as to where he should put the plaque honoring Jan. 6 police officers, if the Speaker won’t allow it to be hung in the Capitol.

😂😂😂

This is a ridiculous charge just make sure you don’t respond to Tulsi Gabbard or Kash Patel about it on X or you’ll be blocked from posting anything on X like me.

Is there a statute of limitations on this so-called crime? Because maybe they should be going after Jeff Bezos for allowing these to be sold on Amazon.

Good! It’s driving MAGA even crazier.

☝️☝️☝️