EmiB71

that blatantly looks to avoid any accountability for its actions. They are fascists in everything but name. This Labour government is fascism in action.

I had never even alluded to. I've said this before but I feel I have to stress it by saying the following again: Under the previous Tory government, FOIs weren't always treated the way they should. But how they handled them pales in comparison to what I'm experiencing now. This is a government

with another 20 days. Failing to meet that they have now again extended their internal review period stating "numerous requests have been received". In the meantime during all this time wasting, they sent additional emails asking for clarification of questions that were never raised, or points that

of the commission in handling very blatant conflicts of interest involving Akua Reindorf. Since challenging them on that point, the internal review of their handling of the issue has been stalled and railroaded. Internal review had 20 days to handle it, from 12 July. After 20MD they extended

#UK #TransRights #EHRC In May this year, I raised an FOI with the EHRC regarding meetings and agenda of ao Akua Reindorf. In the ensuing discussion with the people handling that request, I raised a quite direct challenge with them: Why there was NEVER any action taken regarding obvious failures

To my knowledge, they serve as a national body. They are located in North West but the assessment is for the whole of England.

Uniformed Services Data Guidance Usage Survey Please take the time to complete our survey. Your feedback is important.

Link to the Survey: www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/EHRCDataGu...

#UK #TransRights #EHRC Attention! The EHRC has a survey available about "collecting and analysing equality data in the uniformed services'. I believe the closure date to be an error. it says 18 Oct 2026 but I suspect they mean 2025. (survey in 2nd skeet) www.equalityhumanrights.com/collecting-a...

I say that because it overlaps with the (as far as I know) still ongoing review of those services by Dr Levy. If anyone knows more about this, feel free to comment. And again, I'm glad to see that services are being increased, let that be clear.

#UK #TransRights I'm slightly surprised to have come across a contract award for Gender Dysphoria services for adults in Derby/Derbyshire. The contract was awarded mid September. As much as I applaud extra services being put in place, it's the timing of it which is a bit odd.

The consultation: www.engage.england.nhs.uk/consultation...

#UK #TransRights IMPORTANT! The NHS is currently engaged in a consultation about the children and young persons gender identity services. If this affects you, please provide your feedback. PS. remember that since the Cass review has been implemented that ZERO patients have been given access to HRT.

#UK #TransRights Excellent article which uses the Cass review as an example of how the term "evidence-based practices" can be easily weaponized into policy defining outcomes while essentially not providing with evidence to support those policies. www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2025/false-p...

The section I screenshotted can be found under "What has been updated revised?" in the FAQ of the webpage (see link in skeet from @sarahviktoria.bsky.social )

And now that I have seen the metrics they've put on it, that fear is confirmed. Maybe 1 metric in there looks for improvement (on mental health) but the rest are about the service with no regard really if the care they provided was in the patient's best interest. The metrics:

#UK #TransRights #NHS I warned about it when I read the meeting minutes of Cass' Oversight Board. Her only concern was communication with the media and that all the players within the NHS came with the same lines. Nothing in her approach looked at patient outcome for the CYP Gender Service

#UK #TransRights The British Psychological Society has this in their guidelines for psychologists working with gender, sexuality and relationship diversity.

And allow me to point out where that leads: Scientific research quality is staggeringly bad, mostly because ideologues don't care what they have to destroy to get ahead with their agenda.

So, I will happily elaborate on that. Because honestly, why do I collect the evidence if those who have power to change things, refuse to acknowledge actual facts but are happy to keep pushing bad lies after even more bad lies. We're now at a point where facts have no value at all anymore.

The Equal Treatment Book has now solidified a 2 ties judicial system which oppresses the voices for good. In open court, misgendering has now been set to traffic offence level which will only further encourage negative behaviour.

trans person to be convicted is a fact. Many more will follow, and soon too. Why? because it rewards typical "chasers" with an added bonus. And to add oil to the already raging fire, the ETTB has been updated too.

Finally: The judiciary: The saw fit to change a rape law, to make it fully encompass all trans people accusing them of deception to sex. The new guidance was written without anyone having asked for it. It was not part of their objectives. And obviously less than 6 month after that change, the first

Abt Bridget, I'll be brief: it was her driving the EHRC to publish this unworkable guidance. I have no doubt she will stick the knife in our backs. She will run down the clock (40 days) without Parliament given the opportunity to debate,

The sample size (aimed at 3600) is a sick joke. And then I haven't even mentioned the wild assumptions that they are willing to take. Happy to break it down in detail if needed. It's 40 pages of mostly garbage. That possible the only resemblance it has to me.

Similarly, Prof Emily Simonoff has been appointed lead investigator for the PATHWAYS horizon study. To my utter shock and surprise, the CAG has granted ethical approval for her study into transgender healthcare. Her research protocol is one of the worst in its kind. Research bias is built in,

Conflicts of Interest were not accurately registered and investigated. Even though the ethical approval was received it remains disturbing that no proper oversight was exercised by UCL nor the government. I will be appealing the decision by the ICO which did not uphold the complaint.

team. It even went so far as to breach its own governance procedures when it refused to investigate a valid complaint that was submitted in line with their corporate governance. In the complaint, it is made clear that nobody on the research had the necessary qualifications to perform the research.

In both cases the suicides mainly occur because patients are not being seen.
3, The data problems are a direct consequence of the "research" by Alice Sullivan and MBM. Funnily enough, UCL has refused to evidence how they managed the risks and also refused to provide justification for the research

report any useful statistics about trans people. In fact, they actually only added 1 column with statistical relevant input this year. And that column contains data on the entire European catalog. As a result, nobody has picked on the fact that trans & mental health patients suicides are increasing.

1. "Watchful waiting" and the "multi disciplinary assessment" of trans youth patients, has meant that since July 2024, ZERO youth patients have been given permission to start HRT. 22 patients have been dumped in adult services without a complete evaluation even.
2. Neither the ONS, CMDB nor NHS