You're still missing my point lol. Try again. Also, think realllll hard on why you didn't have to complain about censorship... it's a tough one, I know. But I have faith in you! You got this

Also, outlawing murder isn't overreach. It's common sense.

Your argument fails bc it assumes government is the ultimate arbiter of what a human being is. in the 1800s you would've been one of the people saying slaves weren't humans because the government says so. "They're property - see? It's right here on this document from the government."

a stick figure with a sad face is standing in front of a sign that says the point . ALT: a stick figure with a sad face is standing in front of a sign that says the point .

reread it

Sounds legit

They should be

Clearly, you're not able to keep up with the discussion. I bid you a fond adieu.

a close up of an older man 's face with the words `` ironic '' written on his face . ALT: a close up of an older man 's face with the words `` ironic '' written on his face .

Ironic claim given your worldview has its feet firmly planted in midair. What's the standard of morality? How do you know whether something is right or wrong?

Yes you do need an escape hatch bc the obvious truth here is you're stretching yourself into a pretzel to try and justify the murder of the humans inside the womb. They're not a "potential life" they're a life. It's a scientific fact. Dig deeper & repent of supporting this evil.

Sentience is not the escape hatch you think it is. Sentience is completely arbitrary and not a definition of if something is alive or not. Thinka bout it.

Just answer the question. Is murder wrong?

Is murder right or wrong?

Wow. Her heart for God radiates in that letter. Parents robbed of their daughter, siblings robbed of their sister, and an unknown young man robbed of a godly wife. Tragic.

"Choice" is probably the biggest lie in modern history. It's not your body, therefore it's not your choice. The science is quite settled on this. The way pro-abortion sickos take advantage of vulnerable women when they're scared and in a time of uncertainty is unequivocally evil.

Without the friction of competing ideas, discourse fades into monotony. The troubling part? Libs seem to crave the echo chamber, while conservatives just want to avoid bans. One side tests its ideas in the open; the other silences dissent. Telling. And deeply concerning.

Platforms like GABB, Getter, Parler, and BlueSky will always struggle to rival the user base of X. Platforms that thrive on agreement loops can’t compete with the raw energy of a marketplace where every idea is out there—being challenged, meme-ified, and dunked on.

After a couple of days perusing BlueSky, here's my takeaway: libs who miss pre-Elon Twitter and have a nostalgic pining for the suppression, banning, and institutional labeling of standard conservative views as 'misinformation' think they've found their utopia - a world without unopposing views. BUT

Congrats, sir!

What's funny to me is I'm old enough to remember the days of leftists mocking conservatives for trying Rumble, Parlor, Gettr etc, seeking somewhere they wouldn't be censored. "Enjoy your echo chamber!" they jeered. Fast forward ten minutes later here they are on an exact carbon copy of Twitter😂